Oh. My. God.

Change it to: "If you don't suck cock you get cancer"

God knows what she was searching for when she found it though....

You obviously don't read many of my posts. *shakes head*

ZarathustraX

I don't believe that. First of all, I think it would be very difficult to make sure that that was THE only difference between the two categories of people tested. There are so many factors which contribute to cancer so something like this can be really insignificant/irrelevent surely?! And that's not even considering the truth of these claims. I mean, something like height etc scientists can verify but they can't look into each test person's personal life!

Second of all, I doubt women will suddenly start doing it more because of this. I also BET that scientist was male!

I don't believe that. First of all, I think it would be very difficult to make sure that that was THE only difference between the two categories of people tested. There are so many factors which contribute to cancer so something like this can be really insignificant/irrelevent surely?! And that's not even considering the truth of these claims. I mean, something like height etc scientists can verify but they can't look into each test person's personal life!

Second of all, I doubt women will suddenly start doing it more because of this. I also BET that scientist was male!

Edit: As someone else pointed out, I also find the words and phrases like "may" and "suspected of" to be rather suspicious.

AH Science is so biased sometimes!

Change it to: "If you don't suck cock you get cancer"

I don't believe that. First of all, I think it would be very difficult to make sure that that was THE only difference between the two categories of people tested. There are so many factors which contribute to cancer so something like this can be really insignificant/irrelevent surely?! And that's not even considering the truth of these claims. I mean, something like height etc scientists can verify but they can't look into each test person's personal life!

Second of all, I doubt women will suddenly start doing it more because of this. I also BET that scientist was male!

Edit: As someone else pointed out, I also find the words and phrases like "may" and "suspected of" to be rather suspicious.

AH Science is so biased sometimes!

TRUST YOU TO COME ALONG AND BE BLODY SENSIBLE, ADHSUR!!!

ZarathustraX

It's a pisstake. Seriously, how can it not be with names like "Dr. Inserta Shafteer" and "Dr. Len Lictepeen"? Also, it has CNN on it, but is on a different website. I put a search on CNN and there are no such articles on their database.

'Twas funny though.

This is absolutely priceless...

Now I don't want to give it all away, but look out for this gem: "Only with regular occurance will your chances [of breast cancer] be reduced, so I encourage all women out there to make [[]] an important part of their daily routine..."

So there ya have it

LMFAO!!!

ZarathustraX

oh you had to spoil it....

i hope i dont get breast cancer *gulp*

i hope i dont get breast cancer *gulp*

It's a pisstake. Seriously, how can it not be with names like "Dr. Inserta Shafteer" and "Dr. Len Lictepeen"? Also, it has CNN on it, but is on a different website. I put a search on CNN and there are no such articles on their database.

'Twas funny though.

edit: I see you've already noticed. I'll stop being a spoil sport now.

EDIT: To all the SPOILSPORTS who said it was a joke: quick! delete your posts before anyone else reads the thread!!

Is it so sad that I actually *have* just done this?