They're not talking about oral though - I don't know if the hormones would be absorbed that way as they'd be more likely to get digested...
close analysis of the article you choose to dispute their proposed hypothesis based on similar mechanisms to the effectiveness of the oral contraceptive?
i'm mostly inclined to go for the condom status as a marker for relationship fulfillment/emotional support etc. though. hmm..
close analysis of the article you choose to dispute their proposed hypothesis based on similar mechanisms to the effectiveness of the oral contraceptive?
i'm mostly inclined to go for the condom status as a marker for relationship fulfillment/emotional support etc. though. hmm..
This is of course true, but they're not just talking about steroid hormones, and the article is about condom use for vaginal, not oral sex, therefore the link being made by nearly everyone here is not mentioned in said article.
hmm, i wonder who the test were carried out on that would be a f'ed up job
Those experiments are questionnaire-based so people just comment on their acts. It's like those statistics about penis size all based on questionnaires and we all know how honest guys are about that! You know a one or two-inch increase of your measurement is quite an ego boost. The numbers for the few tests where the guys got measured are much lower. As you can imagine.
Those experiments are questionnaire-based so people just comment on their acts. It's like those statistics about penis size all based on questionnaires and we all know how honest guys are about that! You know a one or two-inch increase of your measurement is quite an ego boost. The numbers for the few tests where the guys got measured are much lower. As you can imagine.
Maybe it was just really cold when the measurements were taken. Or perhaps the measurements were taken by a fat old bloke?