Testing at 5% confidence level.In a school, a standardized reading test is used to test the performance of students againast the national norm for that age group. The number of students taking the test in this school is 55.
The national norm score is 100, with a standard deviation for this year of 12. The school learns that the mean for their students is 96. Is the school's mean test score sufficiently lower than the national norm as to indicate a problem?
We reject as there is evidence to suggest that the school's mean is not insignificantly lower than the national average.
Is this right? Particularly (*) w.r.t. one- or two-tailed test.
(It seems odd rejecting for given that they're not exhaustive - shouldn't or something? This is certainly how the textbook does it, though - although this particular question is an adaptation of something found on Wikipedia.)
Turn on thread page Beta
Stats - Z Test watch
- Thread Starter
- 28-01-2009 16:56
- Study Helper
- 28-01-2009 17:41
Seems right to me, although I would have said:
Therefore we reject .
So yes, there is evidence to suggest that the school's mean is sufficiently lower than the national norm to indicate a problem.
Rather than use a double negative, and this also ties it back to the original question.
are merely alternative viewpoints, and there is no need for them to be exhaustive. The first is assumed to be true, unless statistically significant evidence shows otherwise.
That's probably no help, but don't know what else I can say on it.