The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1

lol, I've been waiting for replies for this and none have come yet.
I don't think romance is dead, I see it everywhere I go. My mates boyfriend is always giving her all these romatic gestures and he loves walking in the park with her and holding hands, and he loves sex with candles in the room, and he covered her car up with red roses on her birthday, shes a lucky sod. I saw this very old couple on the train today and they were holding hands and looking at each other, awww it was sweet. My cousin got married over xmas and in her wedding her fiance had fireworks with her name in it and the recption was all covered with smoke, and low lights, and it was all so romantic. Romance is not dead, I'm a very romantic person myself.

Reply 2

BlueAngel
lol, I've been waiting for replies for this and none have come yet.
I don't think romance is dead, I see it everywhere I go. My mates boyfriend is always giving her all these romatic gestures and he loves walking in the park with her and holding hands, and he loves sex with candles in the room, and he covered her car up with red roses on her birthday, shes a lucky sod. I saw this very old couple on the train today and they were holding hands and looking at each other, awww it was sweet. My cousin got married over xmas and in her wedding her fiance had fireworks with her name in it and the recption was all covered with smoke, and low lights, and it was all so romantic. Romance is not dead, I'm a very romantic person myself.


I wasn't really talking about that kind of romance. The stuff you describe is very nice but it's more the superficial part of romance: the candles and roses and serenades. I was talking about love within a relationship.

I'm surprised that so many girls/guys say they look for romance/love, yet end up screwing around. It's a mystery to me. It seems that it's easier to find someone to screw around with than to love. Only, when you start getting into the whole physical relationship thing, your chances of romantic encounters diminish... it's quite sad really. Damn, I sound bitter.

Reply 3

SamTheMan
I wasn't really talking about that kind of romance. The stuff you describe is very nice but it's more the superficial part of romance: the candles and roses and serenades. I was talking about love within a relationship.

I'm surprised that so many girls/guys say they look for romance/love, yet end up screwing around. It's a mystery to me. It seems that it's easier to find someone to screw around with than to love. Only, when you start getting into the whole physical relationship thing, your chances of romantic encounters diminish... it's quite sad really. Damn, I sound bitter.


I do agree with you though. Maybe there are a few of the true romantics left (and hopefully I'm one of them).

Reply 4

SamTheMan
I wasn't really talking about that kind of romance. The stuff you describe is very nice but it's more the superficial part of romance: the candles and roses and serenades. I was talking about love within a relationship.

I'm surprised that so many girls/guys say they look for romance/love, yet end up screwing around. It's a mystery to me. It seems that it's easier to find someone to screw around with than to love. Only, when you start getting into the whole physical relationship thing, your chances of romantic encounters diminish... it's quite sad really. Damn, I sound bitter.


lol, then you should have said is Love dead. I always considered romance to be different to love. Love is a strong feeling and emotion, whereas romance is summit different, which I cant explain. Yeah i agree with you, but I think most of us are still too young yet. I know alot of people, who say they are in love with their gf/bf and then cheat on them after a week and say that theyre in love with their next bf/gf . THAT ANNOYS ME. :mad:
But thats a different matter. Romance is a physical thing isnt it? Or a passionate affection and desire felt by lovers for each other.

Reply 5

BlueAngel
lol, then you should have said is Love dead. I always considered romance to be different to love. Love is a strong feeling and emotion, whereas romance is summit different, which I cant explain. Yeah i agree with you, but I think most of us are still too young yet. I know alot of people, who say they are in love with their gf/bf and then cheat on them after a week and say that theyre in love with their next bf/gf . THAT ANNOYS ME. :mad:
But thats a different matter. Romance is a physical thing isnt it? Or a passionate affection and desire felt by lovers for each other.


You're right, I guess. There's a difference between how the terms romance and love are used but to me, they're very linked. Romance is just a way of expressing love. Then again, it's a way to pull sensitive girls.

Ok this is a bit of a controversial statement but I think guys are more attached to actual feelings than girls. Girls seem more attached to the actual expression of those feelings, even if the feelings aren't there. A girl will be happy to hear her boyfriend "loves" her without actually wondering how true his feelings are.

Reply 6

Romance better not be dead. I just shelled out £45 for a big bunch of roses for my girlfriend...

Edit for below: Uh it was her birthday, :/ I'd never do that normally...

Reply 7

Alewhey
Romance better not be dead. I just shelled out £45 for a big bunch of roses for my girlfriend...


hehe Flowers are definitely good. I like doing romantic gestures but not to the point that you're like some crap latin lover serenading to your muse. I know mates who said they would never buy flowers for a girlfriend because it would be gay. It would have to be for an extremely special occasion (maybe after sleeping with her best mate?). I don't get that. Same guys maintain that it's stupid to buy a drink for a girl in a club/bar.
As far as I'm concerned, it's one of the best things we can do, as guys.

Reply 8

SamTheMan
You're right, I guess. There's a difference between how the terms romance and love are used but to me, they're very linked. Romance is just a way of expressing love. Then again, it's a way to pull sensitive girls.

Ok this is a bit of a controversial statement but I think guys are more attached to actual feelings than girls. Girls seem more attached to the actual expression of those feelings, even if the feelings aren't there. A girl will be happy to hear her boyfriend "loves" her without actually wondering how true his feelings are.

Depending on how he said it, I'm sure all girls aren't that naive. Look at me sticking up for the entire female population, lol, yeah some girls are like that, they will believe any crap that sounds romatintic coming from a guys mouth, especially if theyre damn sexy. Guys like to use girls, but Ive never some across a girl who bedded a guy cos he said he loved her, thats ridiculous.

A girl will be happy to hear her boyfriend "loves" her without actually wondering how true his feelings are.

Most guys dont show their feelings and emotions, thats the problem. Its hard to see if a guy really loves you or not.

Reply 9

SamTheMan
What ever happened to romance in relationships? Maybe it's just because everyone here is younger but it seems like people here have boyfriends/girlfriends for all reasons other than actual love or feelings.

Is it just me?


There are still plenty of romantics left *jumps up and down waving arms* :biggrin:

Reply 10

Sometimes my boyfriend doesn't always tell me how he feels. but all those little special things he does, the little gestures, show it just as much.

Reply 11

Zurich
There are still plenty of romantics left *jumps up and down waving arms* :biggrin:


Yeah but it's not cool to be a romantic.
As a friend told me at the end of high school, all girls look for is a nice big cock. Words of wisdom...in a strange way.

Reply 12

I would say I have a bit of a romance thang goin' on. :cool:

Reply 13

SamTheMan
Yeah but it's not cool to be a romantic.
As a friend told me at the end of high school, all girls look for is a nice big cock. Words of wisdom...in a strange way.

You're mixing in the wrong bunch of mates.

Reply 14

SamTheMan
Yeah but it's not cool to be a romantic.
As a friend told me at the end of high school, all girls look for is a nice big cock. Words of wisdom...in a strange way.


Your friend is misinformed. :rolleyes:

Reply 15

SamTheMan
You're right, I guess. There's a difference between how the terms romance and love are used but to me, they're very linked. Romance is just a way of expressing love. Then again, it's a way to pull sensitive girls.

Ok this is a bit of a controversial statement but I think guys are more attached to actual feelings than girls. Girls seem more attached to the actual expression of those feelings, even if the feelings aren't there. A girl will be happy to hear her boyfriend "loves" her without actually wondering how true his feelings are.


I'm not sure that you're 100% right there. I mean, when my boyfriend says he loves me, i know he means it. I suppose I do know a lot of people that constantly say I love you which does devalue it I guess. And then I know people that are in love with the idea of being in love.

Reply 16

Romance isnt dead, love is

Reply 17

Two reasons for buying a girl a big bunch of flowers:

1. Because you love her, and want to make her happy.

2. Because you want to sleep with her.

Is Option 2 romantic? Do you think many guys use Option 2?

You see these kids who are about 13/14 chatting about their girlfriends, and it's just pretty obvious with a vast majority of them that they simply have a girlfriend to impress their mates and to increase their social stature. I'm not so sure what it's like with girls, but that's the impression I get from the boys.

Is sex selfish? Is it just to pleasure yourself, or is it because you want to share something together? Sex is romance when it's about sharing. Having sex to impress your friends and to pleasure only yourself is not romance. So is romance dead? In some cases it may be. In films like Road Trip and American Pie, it most certainly is.

Reply 18

Interesting thread! I'd give you rep for it but I'm all out.

No...romance isn't dead :love: I guess it just depends on the examples you look at. I know exactly what you mean though.

I think it's intersting how, contrary to popular belief, the most romantic things/situations are not the cliched/superficial ones at all. Far from it. Of course putting all the cheesy loveydovey things ON TOP OF the stronger things is a bonus, but having them on their own is meaningless.

Reply 19

SamTheMan

I think guys are more attached to actual feelings than girls. Girls seem more attached to the actual expression of those feelings, even if the feelings aren't there.

I doubt that's true. I sure hope not anyway.

Ah this should be where the bitter side'll take over and I start proclaiming love doesn't exist! But no :smile:

Articles for you