Go to first unread
Back
to top
Quality of Forum
Watch
Announcements
This discussion is closed.
Report
#21
(Original post by Unregistered)
It's should have a comma in it.
It's should have a comma in it.
0
(Original post by Unregistered)
It's should have a comma in it.
It's should have a comma in it.
Youmean apostrophe.
0
Report
#24
(Original post by theone)
An apostrophe, we should all know that it should be an apostrophe
An apostrophe, we should all know that it should be an apostrophe
0
Report
#25
(Original post by Unregistered)
It's should have a comma in it.
It's should have a comma in it.
0
(Original post by Chris_)
Damn, I was a bit too slow to reply to that one.
Damn, I was a bit too slow to reply to that one.
0
Report
#28
Yeah I think that to be able to post you should have to be logged in as a registered user. Is it also possible to stop people posting new threads until they their post count is up to 50 or something like that? I think that would work quite well in deterring people from constantly registering as new users in order to spam the board.
I also think the number of / organisation of the mods needs to be looked at as there are quite a lot of times when there are no mods online. Although I realise the mods have a life, it may be a good idea of they sat down and worked out when they are likely to be online. For example, if they realise that none of them are usually online at lunchtime, maybe a new mod could be recruited who thinks he will be.
I also think the number of / organisation of the mods needs to be looked at as there are quite a lot of times when there are no mods online. Although I realise the mods have a life, it may be a good idea of they sat down and worked out when they are likely to be online. For example, if they realise that none of them are usually online at lunchtime, maybe a new mod could be recruited who thinks he will be.
0
Report
#29
I think I'm the reason this forum has been so bad. I make about 150 posts a day and most of them are ****. I'm responsible for all the pointless threads and I'm here all the time.
0
Report
#30
(Original post by Unregistered)
I think I'm the reason this forum has been so bad. I make about 150 posts a day and most of them are ****. I'm responsible for all the pointless threads and I'm here all the time.
I think I'm the reason this forum has been so bad. I make about 150 posts a day and most of them are ****. I'm responsible for all the pointless threads and I'm here all the time.
lou xxx
0
Report
#31
(Original post by lou p lou)
errrrr... get a life...
lou xxx
errrrr... get a life...
lou xxx
0
Report
#32
I don't agree with the point that you should have 50+ posts to start a thread. Some people may join the board to ask a question and may be unable to as they haven't reached the 50 post benchmark.
0
Report
#33
(Original post by Lord Huntroyde)
I thought that. Theone was damn speedy.
I thought that. Theone was damn speedy.
0
Report
#34
(Original post by G4ry)
I don't agree with the point that you should have 50+ posts to start a thread. Some people may join the board to ask a question and may be unable to as they haven't reached the 50 post benchmark.
I don't agree with the point that you should have 50+ posts to start a thread. Some people may join the board to ask a question and may be unable to as they haven't reached the 50 post benchmark.
0
Report
#36
(Original post by NikNak)
Thats a fair point actually I didn't think about that. I was just thinking that banning unregistered people won't stop the boards being spammed because it only takes a min to register a new user.
Thats a fair point actually I didn't think about that. I was just thinking that banning unregistered people won't stop the boards being spammed because it only takes a min to register a new user.
0
Report
#37
(Original post by NikNak)
Thats a fair point actually I didn't think about that. I was just thinking that banning unregistered people won't stop the boards being spammed because it only takes a min to register a new user.
Thats a fair point actually I didn't think about that. I was just thinking that banning unregistered people won't stop the boards being spammed because it only takes a min to register a new user.
lou xxx
0
Report
#38
(Original post by G4ry)
It only takes a minute to block an I.P as well.
It only takes a minute to block an I.P as well.
lou xxx
0
Report
#39
(Original post by lou p lou)
yeah, but people will know who the culprit is and will never take them seriously. i don't agree with the 50 post thing- so many people start using this forum because they have a question to ask- they'd have to do 50 pointless posts before they could ask it. bit stupid really.
lou xxx
yeah, but people will know who the culprit is and will never take them seriously. i don't agree with the 50 post thing- so many people start using this forum because they have a question to ask- they'd have to do 50 pointless posts before they could ask it. bit stupid really.
lou xxx
0
Report
#40
Yes, but they're doing to have to dis-connect from the internet and re-connect in order to gain a new I.P which is going to be annoying for them. Also they probably didn't know that until i just said now.
0
X
new posts
