This discussion is closed.
++Hex++
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#21
Report 17 years ago
#21
(Original post by GingerIsKing)
I have that tomorrow as well. I have not done any before and have only recently seen a past paper.
Past paper???! We just used to wander in one morning and our teacher would say, "Right, I signed you all up for this Maths challenge thing..."

Relax. It's not an exam. You're supposed to enjoy it...
0
Phil_C
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#22
Report 17 years ago
#22
E is correct

W, X,Y,Z are all prime and 2002 is even so W say is 2
Therefore 2*1001
Product of Three no is ~ 1000 so each must be around 10
clearly 3, 5 not true, 7? yes 7 *143
so 2*7*143
2*7*11*13
so 2^2=4
7^2=49
11^2=121
13^2=169
Sum = 343 ans E
0
Ralfskini
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#23
Report 17 years ago
#23
(Original post by Phil_C)
E is correct

W, X,Y,Z are all prime and 2002 is even so W say is 2
Therefore 2*1001
Product of Three no is ~ 1000 so each must be around 10
clearly 3, 5 not true, 7? yes 7 *143
so 2*7*143
2*7*11*13
so 2^2=4
7^2=49
11^2=121
13^2=169
Sum = 343 ans E
Why have you assumed that for the product of three numbers to be about 1000 for them all to be roughly equal to 10?
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#24
Report 17 years ago
#24
(Original post by Ralfskini)
Why have you assumed that for the product of three numbers to be about 1000 for them all to be roughly equal to 10?
Because 10^3 = 10x10x10 = 1000?
0
Ralfskini
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#25
Report 17 years ago
#25
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
Because 10^3 = 10x10x10 = 1000?
yes, so is 2 * 25 * 20.
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#26
Report 17 years ago
#26
(Original post by Ralfskini)
yes, so is 2 * 25 * 20.
Two of which are not primes...
0
Ralfskini
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#27
Report 17 years ago
#27
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
Two of which are not primes...
Yes but 10 isn't prime. I'm just saying......

I wasn't suggesting that as a possible answer, just that the numbers dont have to be approximately equal to 10. Does anybody else see where I'm coming from?
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#28
Report 17 years ago
#28
(Original post by Ralfskini)
Yes but 10 isn't prime. I'm just saying......

I wasn't suggesting that as a possible answer, just that the numbers dont have to be approximately equal to 10. Does anybody else see where I'm coming from?
I know but the assumption seemed to work. No need to fix what ain't broke...
0
Ralfskini
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#29
Report 17 years ago
#29
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
I know but the assumption seemed to work. No need to fix what ain't broke...
True it worked but it was not logical. Its like saying 'two numbers have to add together to make 50 so ill just assume that each one is approximately equal to 25.' What about 49 + 1?
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#30
Report 17 years ago
#30
(Original post by Ralfskini)
True it worked but it was not logical. Its like saying 'two numbers have to add together to make 50 so ill just assume that each one is approximately equal to 25.' What about 49 + 1?
Try looking at the answer without the 10 bit. Looks better like that I reckon.
0
Ralfskini
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#31
Report 17 years ago
#31
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
Try looking at the answer without the 10 bit. Looks better like that I reckon.
Agreed.
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#32
Report 17 years ago
#32
(Original post by Ralfskini)
Agreed.
At last :rolleyes: hahaha!
0
Phil_C
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#33
Report 17 years ago
#33
(Original post by Ralfskini)
Why have you assumed that for the product of three numbers to be about 1000 for them all to be roughly equal to 10?
Knowing the first is 2 the smallest of all primes, the others must product to 1001 which is just a little larger than 10^3, 1000. Gives you a starting point to search for them and given that you are searching for three values, if they were large, eg 31 to pull a prime form the ether, then their product would far exceed the 1001 target.

PC
0
Phil_C
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#34
Report 17 years ago
#34
Your idea of investigating two values suming to 50 so go in the middle is not similar, unless there was further evidence that the values we are looking at are around the middle. In this instance I knew they could not be large and key small primes didn't fit. It is then a case of knowing your tables or a logical search
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#35
Report 17 years ago
#35
Good luck all with the Senior Maths Challenge!!!

Any mod going to make a short-term sticky on it???
0
Ralfskini
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#36
Report 17 years ago
#36
I arrived late for maths challenge so only got and hour to do it.
0
Ralfskini
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#37
Report 17 years ago
#37
So, did anybody take the challenge or what?
0
sock
Badges: 8
Rep:
?
#38
Report 17 years ago
#38
(Original post by Ralfskini)
So, did anybody take the challenge or what?
I took it. I think it went ok, but on some questions I ended up with answers that weren't any of the choices, whoops. I suck at maths, so I'm not gonna be upset when I don't get a certificate.

How do you think you did?
0
Karen_je
Badges: 0
#39
Report Thread starter 17 years ago
#39
Well! I did the test today and it was hard! hope you all did well in it!
0
Ralfskini
Badges: 10
Rep:
?
#40
Report 17 years ago
#40
(Original post by sock)
I took it. I think it went ok, but on some questions I ended up with answers that weren't any of the choices, whoops. I suck at maths, so I'm not gonna be upset when I don't get a certificate.

How do you think you did?
I rekon I would have got a gold with the extra half hour. I only answered the first 17 questions. Ah well. I probably did ok.
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Following the government's announcement, do you think you will be awarded a fair grade this year?

Yes (570)
50.13%
No (567)
49.87%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed