Join TSR now and get all your revision questions answeredSign up now
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Finding out if non-invertible matrices are subspaces of the vector space Mn(R) Watch

1. I have Mn(R) is a vector space of all nxn matrices with n>=2.

Now I need to determine if the set A in Mn(R) is a subspace of Mn(R) where A is the set of all non-invertible matrices.

Now, I know that in vector fields, to prove that a set is a subspace of a vector field we need to show that the 3 axioms hold:

(S1) A is not equal to the empty set.

(S2) A is closed under addition.

(S3) A is closed under multiplication.

I also know that a square matrix is non-invertible if its determinant = 0.

I'm just not really sure how to go about finding out if this set A is a subspace of Mn(R).

Any hints?
2. As always, the first step is to decide whether or not it's true (then you have to either prove it or find a counterexample).

If you're not sure, one thing to think about: Why might it be true? If you can't think of any reason for it to be true, maybe it isn't. If you can find a reason for it to be true, that will give you a hint towards how you might prove it.
3. Ok, I've decided that the non-invertible matrices A are NOT a subspace of Mn(R) because it is not closed under addition:

If you take a non-invertible matrix and add to it another non-invertible matrix, the result is an invertible matrix.

What's the best way to show this?
4. Would an explicit example suffice? And if so, how do I go about finding two non-invertible matrices?
5. Yes, all you need is one counter-example to show it's not closed under addition.

To find a non-invertible matrix, think of what other properties it has, as compared to an invertible matrix.
6. Hello again ghostwalker. Properties non-invertible matrices have... their determinants are equal to 0?
7. (Original post by Sun Tower)
Hello again ghostwalker. Properties non-invertible matrices have... their determinants are equal to 0?
Yep - should be easy to find a couple and experiment.
8. Ok, so after trying a few it appears that adding two non-invertible matrices DOES give you a non-invertible matrix. Is this always true?
9. (Original post by Sun Tower)
Ok, so after trying a few it appears that adding two non-invertible matrices DOES give you a non-invertible matrix. Is this always true?
That's what you have to find out.

Choose the most basic invertible matrix you can imagine, now try and split it up into the sum of two non-invertible matrices.

Write a reply… Reply
Submit reply
Updated: March 9, 2009
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Today on TSR

### Grade boundaries not out until results day

What does this mean for you?

Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups
Study resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.