Go to first unread
Back
to top
Bush
Watch
Announcements
This discussion is closed.
Report
#21
Not to mention he's going to use up a lot of our police force as well. Wouldn't be it more discrete and safer if there was 1 maybe 2 plain looking cars going through london instead of a fleet of 20 with police and flashing lights?? All sounds quite silly to me.
0
Report
#22
(Original post by Tina)
oh oh oh....vienna 's back lol
i dont welcome murderers.
oh oh oh....vienna 's back lol
i dont welcome murderers.
0
(Original post by G4ry)
Not to mention he's going to use up a lot of our police force as well. Wouldn't be it more discrete and safer if there was 1 maybe 2 plain looking cars going through london instead of a fleet of 20 with police and flashing lights?? All sounds quite silly to me.
Not to mention he's going to use up a lot of our police force as well. Wouldn't be it more discrete and safer if there was 1 maybe 2 plain looking cars going through london instead of a fleet of 20 with police and flashing lights?? All sounds quite silly to me.
0
Report
#24
(Original post by G4ry)
Not to mention he's going to use up a lot of our police force as well. Wouldn't be it more discrete and safer if there was 1 maybe 2 plain looking cars going through london instead of a fleet of 20 with police and flashing lights?? All sounds quite silly to me.
Not to mention he's going to use up a lot of our police force as well. Wouldn't be it more discrete and safer if there was 1 maybe 2 plain looking cars going through london instead of a fleet of 20 with police and flashing lights?? All sounds quite silly to me.
0
(Original post by vienna95)
unless you can prove that George Bush has murdered anyone in the last 24hours, i suggest you do some serious thinking about our conversation yesterday.
unless you can prove that George Bush has murdered anyone in the last 24hours, i suggest you do some serious thinking about our conversation yesterday.
0
(Original post by vienna95)
you are quite mad. are you not aware that there is a security risk and that as the host country, we are obliged to provide adequate cover?
you are quite mad. are you not aware that there is a security risk and that as the host country, we are obliged to provide adequate cover?
0
Report
#28
(Original post by Tina)
well i dont knwo about him murdering people personally, but i do believe he is responsible for the death of innocents.
well i dont knwo about him murdering people personally, but i do believe he is responsible for the death of innocents.
0
(Original post by vienna95)
exactly.
exactly.
0
Report
#30
(Original post by Tina)
well i think the majority of tax payers would like their money spent on something other than a monkey (hahahahahahah)
well i think the majority of tax payers would like their money spent on something other than a monkey (hahahahahahah)
0
Report
#31
(Original post by vienna95)
haha, the stopwar gang. they do make me laugh.
haha, the stopwar gang. they do make me laugh.
0
(Original post by vienna95)
in the capacity as commander in chief of the US military. actions taken thus far in that capacity to not justify murder. and you could get yourself into hot water pursuing that slanderous line.
in the capacity as commander in chief of the US military. actions taken thus far in that capacity to not justify murder. and you could get yourself into hot water pursuing that slanderous line.
0
(Original post by Elle)
I've always wondered about conservative humour
I've always wondered about conservative humour
0
(Original post by vienna95)
glad to see your taking it seriously.
glad to see your taking it seriously.
0
Report
#35
(Original post by vienna95)
you are quite mad. are you not aware that there is a security risk and that as the host country, we are obliged to provide adequate cover?
you are quite mad. are you not aware that there is a security risk and that as the host country, we are obliged to provide adequate cover?
If Bush in say a Vauxhall Vectra went through London, no-one would blink or pay any attention. Take a parade of 20 cars and a determined terrorist could assassinate Bush.
Why am i mad?? I think it's very sensible anyway.
0
i have some pictures and famous bush blunders i want to add on here but cant find them...ill post tehm as soon as poss
0
Report
#37
(Original post by Tina)
well its not like im taking him to court for it.....its just my own personal speech / opinion which im entitled to.i thought freedom of speech was one of the things bush loved raving on about?! even though he needs his advisers to help him string 2 sentences together.
well its not like im taking him to court for it.....its just my own personal speech / opinion which im entitled to.i thought freedom of speech was one of the things bush loved raving on about?! even though he needs his advisers to help him string 2 sentences together.
0
Report
#38
(Original post by vienna95)
slander is the abuse of free speech.
slander is the abuse of free speech.
0
(Original post by vienna95)
slander is the abuse of free speech.
slander is the abuse of free speech.
0
Report
#40
(Original post by G4ry)
In order to provide protection there is more than way to get Bush through London other than going around with a huge neon sign shouting out where he is. You think the SAS provide protection with huge numbers of soldiers??? Well, they don't, they use stealth and are discrete.
If Bush in say a Vauxhall Vectra went through London, no-one would blink or pay any attention. Take a parade of 20 cars and a determined terrorist could assassinate Bush.
Why am i mad?? I think it's very sensible anyway.
In order to provide protection there is more than way to get Bush through London other than going around with a huge neon sign shouting out where he is. You think the SAS provide protection with huge numbers of soldiers??? Well, they don't, they use stealth and are discrete.
If Bush in say a Vauxhall Vectra went through London, no-one would blink or pay any attention. Take a parade of 20 cars and a determined terrorist could assassinate Bush.
Why am i mad?? I think it's very sensible anyway.
0
X
new posts
