I suppose this thread is more for mathematicians than anyone else.
My (atheist) friend and I were having a debate about the cosmological argument for God's existence.
We agree on this much:
There are two possibilities  there was either a "first cause" which started off the universe as we know it, or every effect has a cause, and the universe is made up of an infinite regression of cause and effect.
He's also agreed (for sake of argument) that if there is in fact a "first cause", we can name it "God". I know that this bit isn't rigorous at all, but just suppose that we've agreed on it.
Now:
He thinks that there's still no reason to assume that God exists, because the universe could just as easily be an infinite regression of causes and effects.
My argument is that, even if the universe is an infinite regression of causes and effects, it still implies that God exists, and here's why:
Suppose the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time. Then every timeindependentevent whose occurence has a probability greater than zero has occurred, because it has been allowed an infinite amount of time to occur. This is sometimes known as the "infinite monkey theorem", which you can look up on Wikipedia. Assuming that the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time, I can categorically state that at some point in time, a monkey typed out Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet on a typewriter. I can't say when it happened, but it definitely happened.
Similarly, the probability that God, at some point in time, said "let there be light" is also greater than zero. If the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time, then this must have happened at some point.
Therefore, an infinite universe implies that God exists.
Does my argument make sense, or are there any gaping flaws in my logic which jump right out at you?
Turn on thread page Beta

tazarooni89
 Follow
 48 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tazarooni89
 Visit tazarooni89's homepage!
 Thread Starter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 19032009 05:16

generalebriety
 Follow
 15 followers
 14 badges
 Send a private message to generalebriety
 Wiki Support Team
Offline14ReputationRep:Wiki Support Team Follow
 2
 19032009 05:24
(Original post by tazarooni89)
Suppose the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time. Then every timeindependentevent whose occurence has a probability greater than zero has occurred, because it has been allowed an infinite amount of time to occur. 
generalebriety
 Follow
 15 followers
 14 badges
 Send a private message to generalebriety
 Wiki Support Team
Offline14ReputationRep:Wiki Support Team Follow
 3
 19032009 05:32
(Original post by tazarooni89)
Similarly, the probability that God, at some point in time, said "let there be light" is also greater than zero. If the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time, then this must have happened at some point.
Therefore, an infinite universe implies that God exists.
Anyway, for the above reasons, a probabilistic argument won't work anyway. Something occurring with probability 1 isn't the same as something occurring if there are infinities involved. 
tazarooni89
 Follow
 48 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tazarooni89
 Visit tazarooni89's homepage!
 Thread Starter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 4
 19032009 05:32
(Original post by generalebriety)
Not true. The event has occurred with probability 1, which is not the same as saying it has occurred. Analogy: flip a coin "infinitely many times" (humour me), and note down the sequence of heads and tails you get as you go. But the probability of getting that sequence was 0 (i.e. , right?), so the probability of not getting that sequence was 1. But you got it. Oops.
Surely the fact that I've completed the experiment implies that n is not equal to infinity? 
generalebriety
 Follow
 15 followers
 14 badges
 Send a private message to generalebriety
 Wiki Support Team
Offline14ReputationRep:Wiki Support Team Follow
 5
 19032009 05:34
(Original post by tazarooni89)
Surely the probability of getting that sequence was still greater than zero, because flipping a coin infinitely many times takes forever. So I can't flip a coin infinitely many times, and then retrospectively look back on it, and think "but the probability of getting that sequence was zero", because if I begin this experiment, I'll never finish it? 
tazarooni89
 Follow
 48 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tazarooni89
 Visit tazarooni89's homepage!
 Thread Starter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 6
 19032009 05:38
(Original post by generalebriety)
You're the one who started going on about infinite lengths of time, not me.
Well I believe that the universe has existed for a finite amount of time. But my friend thinks that this is a completely arbitrary belief, and it could just as easily have existed forever.
I'm essentially trying to show that my belief in a finite universe isn't arbitrary, because infinite lengths of time cause problems like this? 
tazarooni89
 Follow
 48 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tazarooni89
 Visit tazarooni89's homepage!
 Thread Starter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 7
 19032009 05:39
(Original post by generalebriety)
You're the one who started going on about infinite lengths of time, not me. Anyway, no it doesn't. Flip your first coin in one second, your second coin in half a second, your third coin in a quarter of a second, and so on. Keep halving the time, and it'll only take you two seconds to flip infinitely many coins. Well, you wanted a mathematician's point of view... 
generalebriety
 Follow
 15 followers
 14 badges
 Send a private message to generalebriety
 Wiki Support Team
Offline14ReputationRep:Wiki Support Team Follow
 8
 19032009 05:45
(Original post by tazarooni89)
lol, true.
Well I believe that the universe has existed for a finite amount of time. But my friend thinks that this is a completely arbitrary belief, and it could just as easily have existed forever.
I'm essentially trying to show that my belief in a finite universe isn't arbitrary, because infinite lengths of time cause problems like this? 
tazarooni89
 Follow
 48 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to tazarooni89
 Visit tazarooni89's homepage!
 Thread Starter
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 9
 19032009 05:48
(Original post by generalebriety)
Mmf, that's the start of your problems. Even if you do manage to prove the universe has only existed for a finite length of time (which I think is what scientists are agreeing on now, though I'm not sure), just because you call the first cause "God", and talk about it as if it's a person, that doesn't mean you've actually proved it is anything like what you call a deity. I could quite happily call the Big Bang "God" if I wanted, but that wouldn't make me a theist, it would make me an atheist who liked to misuse theistic terminology. You need to show it has some kind of property of being a deity.
My actual aim is to prove that my belief in a finite universe is not arbitrary. Seems to be harder than I thought though
(This is ignoring science and focusing mainly on philosophy by the way). 
generalebriety
 Follow
 15 followers
 14 badges
 Send a private message to generalebriety
 Wiki Support Team
Offline14ReputationRep:Wiki Support Team Follow
 10
 19032009 05:51
(Original post by tazarooni89)
Yes, I realise that  the God thing was just the start of the conversation really.
My actual aim is to prove that my belief in a finite universe is not arbitrary. Seems to be harder than I thought though
(This is ignoring science and focusing mainly on philosophy by the way). 
The Bachelor
 Follow
 0 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to The Bachelor
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 11
 19032009 05:55
(Original post by generalebriety)
Not true. The event has occurred with probability 1, which is not the same as saying it has occurred. Analogy: flip a coin "infinitely many times" (humour me), and note down the sequence of heads and tails you get as you go. But the probability of getting that sequence was 0 (i.e. , right?), so the probability of not getting that sequence was 1. But you got it. Oops.
(Also, an easier example would be throwing darts on a dartboard. If the dart lands on (0,0) for example, then the probability that it doesn't land there is 1, the probability that it does is 0, and yet it did.) 
Schmokie Dragon
 Follow
 6 followers
 14 badges
 Send a private message to Schmokie Dragon
 Visit Schmokie Dragon's homepage!
Offline14ReputationRep: Follow
 12
 19032009 06:00
Hmm. This is a rusty philosopher's view 
You don't need to suppose God to suppose a first cause. As we cannot explain how or why God exists, we can just as easily suppose that the universe caused itself. To suppose a being that must have existed infinitely or created itself is in defiance of Ockham's Razor, which suggests that if we already have a weird entity that may have existed infinitely or caused itself, we are not solving the problem by adding another one to explain the first.
Anyway, I think generalbriety's maths is correct. I'm a bit poo at maths. It is also 5am and I'm stuck pissing about with quantum mechanics. I'm tired =( 
The Bachelor
 Follow
 0 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to The Bachelor
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 13
 19032009 06:02
(Original post by tazarooni89)
Suppose the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time. Then every timeindependentevent whose occurence has a probability greater than zero has occurred, because it has been allowed an infinite amount of time to occur. This is sometimes known as the "infinite monkey theorem", which you can look up on Wikipedia. Assuming that the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time, I can categorically state that at some point in time, a monkey typed out Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet on a typewriter. I can't say when it happened, but it definitely happened. 
Manny_Manny
 Follow
 0 followers
 0 badges
 Send a private message to Manny_Manny
Offline0ReputationRep: Follow
 14
 19032009 06:29
You're still stuck on two sides of belief...there's nothing you can do about it in my view..but then that's just what I beleive...
Logic can't help you here really, and the same goes for your friend.
Also, if there has always been a universe, then isn't it impossible for it to have been created by god (or any other means)? When you look at the universe as infininate then it becomes impossible to pinpoint when things have happened/do happen/will happen...maybe it's infinate in that time goes round in a loop...or maybe not  just don't ask Stephen Hawkins what it's shaped like... 
The Bachelor
 Follow
 0 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to The Bachelor
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 15
 19032009 07:40
Hm, the best interpretation I've been able to think up (of the probability of an event) is that if you repeat the experiment, the probability is the proportion of times that the event occurs... and eventually the limit as you keep doing so.
Not sure if this is good or not. But, for example, if the probability that an event occurs is 1 then, under this interpretation, it might not occur in some particular experiment. It just has to occur enough times that the limit of the proportion is 1. (Likewise, something with a probability of 0 might occur within a particular experiment. But it has to not occur enough times that the limit of the proportion is 0.) 
Profesh
 Follow
 103 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to Profesh
 Visit Profesh's homepage!
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 16
 19032009 08:03
(Original post by tazarooni89)
Similarly, the probability that God, at some point in time, said "let there be light" is also greater than zero. If the universe has existed for an infinite amount of time, then this must have happened at some point.
Therefore, an infinite universe implies that God exists.
Does my argument make sense, or are there any gaping flaws in my logic which jump right out at you?
"A monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely type a given text, such as the complete works of William Shakespeare."
Your interpretation:
"A monkey hitting keys at random on a typewriter keyboard for an infinite amount of time will almost surely cause the Earth to spontaneously transform into a delicious blancmange."
I'm sure I needn't elaborate further. 
The Bachelor
 Follow
 0 followers
 12 badges
 Send a private message to The Bachelor
Offline12ReputationRep: Follow
 17
 19032009 08:17
(Original post by tazarooni89)
My actual aim is to prove that my belief in a finite universe is not arbitrary. Seems to be harder than I thought though
(This is ignoring science and focusing mainly on philosophy by the way).
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Related discussions
 Send help pls
 Hyperbolic Trigonometric Functions  calculator mode: radians or degrees?
 If a tree falls and makes a sound while no body is there to hear it does it exist?
 A level government and politics
 'I can't do much by myself so I'll ignore it'
 Hamlet  A Revenge Drama?
 Do we have innate knowledge?
 EPQ Title
 Strawson: consciousness is matter
 consequentialism vs deontolgy
TSR Support Team
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
This forum is supported by:
Updated: March 19, 2009
Share this discussion:
Tweet