The Student Room Logo

Choosing an Oxford College

Scroll to see replies

Reply 3340
Original post by Zakee
Hey all. Quick question, and I'd honestly like a truthful answer. Trinity College (Cambridge) has been known to be quite vindictive with its offers and also the way it works when providing offers to people from the pool e.t.c. Does Christ Church also operate a similar format? I know people say "it's not any more difficult to get into one college than the other" but on this years STEP 2013 thread, it was obvious that Trinity was quite nasty with the way it did things and it was very idiosyncratic. Does C'Church operate a similar policy?

Thanks.


I don't know what you mean about Trinity, Cambridge, being vindictive. Bear in mind that Trinity, Cambridge, has an unusually high reputation for maths, which could account somewhat for the perceived vindictiveness on its part. Oxford has university-wide standard offers, and this is what ChCh will use.
Reply 3341
Original post by BJack
I don't know what you mean about Trinity, Cambridge, being vindictive. Bear in mind that Trinity, Cambridge, has an unusually high reputation for maths, which could account somewhat for the perceived vindictiveness on its part. Oxford has university-wide standard offers, and this is what ChCh will use.



Someone got 6 A*s, SS3 in STEP (I,II,III) and was rejected (when pooled). They also acquired the highest mark in STEP II.

On the other hand, someone I know got 4 A*s 2,2 in STEP (II,III) and was still accepted by their main choice (St Johns).

Seems pretty cruel to me.
Original post by Zakee
Someone got 6 A*s, SS3 in STEP (I,II,III) and was rejected (when pooled). They also acquired the highest mark in STEP II.

On the other hand, someone I know got 4 A*s 2,2 in STEP (II,III) and was still accepted by their main choice (St Johns).

Seems pretty cruel to me.


Not at all.

Nobody can be crammed to those sort of grades, so this wasn't a case of someone's marks being flattering as to their genuine ability.

Whenever someone with such stellar grades is not fished (at Cambridge) or receives multiple interviews but no offers (at Oxford), the position is clear. Several academics have taken the view that they are incapable of being taught by an interactive tutorial method of teaching.
Reply 3343
Original post by nulli tertius
Not at all.

Nobody can be crammed to those sort of grades, so this wasn't a case of someone's marks being flattering as to their genuine ability.

Whenever someone with such stellar grades is not fished (at Cambridge) or receives multiple interviews but no offers (at Oxford), the position is clear. Several academics have taken the view that they are incapable of being taught by an interactive tutorial method of teaching.


No no, he had an offer. Zakee is talking about the summer pool for maths candidates who miss STEP.
Original post by SParm
No no, he had an offer. Zakee is talking about the summer pool for maths candidates who miss STEP.


I am sorry. You have lost me. He is referring to someone with 6 A* plus the highest possible marks in STEP1 and STEP II. Are you saying that his offer was STEP III dependent? Otherwise how does he end up anywhere near the summer pool?
Reply 3345
Original post by nulli tertius
I am sorry. You have lost me. He is referring to someone with 6 A* plus the highest possible marks in STEP1 and STEP II. Are you saying that his offer was STEP III dependent? Otherwise how does he end up anywhere near the summer pool?


Yes. Most people's offers are STEP II and III dependent. I only know of a few that have I and II offers: Offer holders from Scotland and those that have absolutely no way of doing any further maths.
Original post by SParm
Yes. Most people's offers are STEP II and III dependent. I only know of a few that have I and II offers: Offer holders from Scotland and those that have absolutely no way of doing any further maths.


Then I wonder if someone, referee or interviewer, had noted that the candidate was struggling with the most difficult concepts, so that the STEP III result chimed with what had already been noted, rather than appearing to be an aberration.

Effectively that is what those who fish in the summer pool (for all subjects) are looking for, people whose results are not reflective of their real abilities.
Reply 3347
Original post by nulli tertius
Then I wonder if someone, referee or interviewer, had noted that the candidate was struggling with the most difficult concepts, so that the STEP III result chimed with what had already been noted, rather than appearing to be an aberration.

Effectively that is what those who fish in the summer pool (for all subjects) are looking for, people whose results are not reflective of their real abilities.


I don't really know nearly enough to tell accurately whether your conjecture has any basis in truth, unfortunately. It may do, and it certainly does sound like something the admissions team for a college would look at, but I don't know enough about the candidate.
Original post by legalreality
... just said less of them tend to be into clubbing. It really is true ...


Source?

I don't think we can say that with even the slightest degree of certainty. In my second year, our entz reps were buying more tickets for parkend than any other college, and we're almost twice as small as some.
(edited 10 years ago)
Original post by nulli tertius
Then I wonder if someone, referee or interviewer, had noted that the candidate was struggling with the most difficult concepts, so that the STEP III result chimed with what had already been noted, rather than appearing to be an aberration.

Effectively that is what those who fish in the summer pool (for all subjects) are looking for, people whose results are not reflective of their real abilities.


For what it's worth, I've seen some of the candidate in question on TSR and from what I can see it most certainly is an aberration. As I understand it, STEP III is more difficult than STEP II (as you might expect) but not hugely so. (That could be completely wrong, though.) That's why most people on here seem a bit shocked about the decision - from their profile, it would seem clear that the only off-par result was STEP III. That includes exceptional scores on both of the other papers.


Anyway..

__________



I am considering applying for Law at one of Balliol, St John's or Brasenose. Is there likely to be any difference in teaching quality etc. between these three colleges or should I just pick the one I like best?
Can't decide between Lincoln and Balliol... I can't decide if a small college would be too claustrophobic!
Original post by Chow mein
Can't decide between Lincoln and Balliol... I can't decide if a small college would be too claustrophobic!


Just over 300 undergrads at Lincoln v. a little under 390 at Balliol. I can't believe you would notice a huge amount of difference...

I suppose the 25 less students in each year might slightly change things...
Original post by fluteflute
Just over 300 undergrads at Lincoln v. a little under 390 at Balliol. I can't believe you would notice a huge amount of difference...

I suppose the 25 less students in each year might slightly change things...


Well I have to admit I didn't look at the actual figures, but I have seen Lincoln described as 'small' and Balliol 'medium', if the difference is so small I might not worry about college size!
Original post by Chow mein
Well I have to admit I didn't look at the actual figures, but I have seen Lincoln described as 'small' and Balliol 'medium', if the difference is so small I might not worry about college size!


As said above, I don't think the difference in number would really be noticeable but the medium/small thing could be about the physical size of the college grounds? Lincoln is quite compact and tightly set around smaller quads whereas Balliol has more of an 'open plan' feel to its back quad. Again these things aren't going to make a huge difference to your life but it's interesting to know.

I think there's a bigger difference with colleges like Trinity/Christ Church/Magdalen/New which have much much bigger grounds. Obviously I've never actually attended any of them so I don't know how different it really is in practice, but I've found that when I've wandered around them they have a bit of a different vibe.

((In terms of reference, I go to Brasenose which is somewhere in between Lincoln and Balliol in terms of undergrads per year, but more like Lincoln in terms of physical size. I've never found a physically smaller college to be too claustrophobic!)
Original post by Chow mein
Well I have to admit I didn't look at the actual figures, but I have seen Lincoln described as 'small' and Balliol 'medium', if the difference is so small I might not worry about college size!


My personal feeling is that 25 students per year is quite a lot. That's 30% of the size of Lincoln! It may not make much difference, but then not many factors will, so i think you're justified if you wanted to decide based on that.
Original post by Endless Blue

I am considering applying for Law at one of Balliol, St John's or Brasenose. Is there likely to be any difference in teaching quality etc. between these three colleges or should I just pick the one I like best?


I can't say what John's or Balliol's teaching is like, but I will most happily vouch for Brasenose :biggrin: Absolutely lovely tutors (pastoral care is great, and the tutors are very helpful), great location, decent food. We have a relatively big intake for law (10 undergrads per year), and our own 24/7 law library.

That said, come for an Open Day if you can. Brasenose is the smallest of the three colleges (physically and in terms of student population), although I personally think it's cosy rather than claustrophobic.
Original post by mishieru07
I can't say what John's or Balliol's teaching is like, but I will most happily vouch for Brasenose :biggrin: Absolutely lovely tutors (pastoral care is great, and the tutors are very helpful), great location, decent food. We have a relatively big intake for law (10 undergrads per year), and our own 24/7 law library.

That said, come for an Open Day if you can. Brasenose is the smallest of the three colleges (physically and in terms of student population), although I personally think it's cosy rather than claustrophobic.


I've heard the law tutors can be pretty.. abrasive/brutal. How does this totally contrast with your experience/view?
Original post by Endless Blue
I've heard the law tutors can be pretty.. abrasive/brutal. How does this totally contrast with your experience/view?


Hasn't happened to me - the BNC tutors are a friendly bunch and are generally okay with you not knowing stuff sometimes (obviously, this is not to say that they will tolerate you doing no work at all).

Our seniors told us stories of how terrifying my Trusts tutor would be (eg he used to throw people out of tutorials for not knowing their work), but it turned out to be completely different for me. He was incredibly nice, but I think it also helped that a) He'd just returned from a year-long sabbatical and seemed to have mellowed over that period and b) He was rather fond of my batch as a whole for some reason. We had this conversation once:

Tutor: So, did you read this case?
Us: Uhh no?
Tutor: Why not?
Us: Because we'd have to go to the Law Bod to get it, and it's too far!
Tutor: *laughing* Oh dear, we provide you with a world-class law library which is just 15 minutes away, and you refuse to go because it's too far!

By brutal, do you mean they keep pushing you or that they're mean to you? The tutors WILL push you (my Jurisprudence/ Criminal Law tutor certainly did push us, but we definitely learnt more), but they have never been mean (at least not to me). The general sentiment I get is the tutors do understand you're not superhuman and odds are, you don't finish your reading lists. It's okay to not know certain things sometimes, but it is not okay to say, turn up at tutes having done little/ no work, put little/ no effort into your essays or be disrespectful (eg turning up late). The tutors are quite understanding if you have valid reasons though (eg you were ill in the preceding week, had to deal with personal matters).

That said, there are abrasive/ brutal tutors, but it isn't exactly a bad thing. For example, nearly all my friends who learnt under Adrian Briggs (at Teddy Hall) were properly terrified of him, but boy did they learn their work well. He's a really good tutor (which I think is a fair compromise!)
Hey there,

I will be applying to Oxford next year and I'm having trouble picking a college. I want to study English, and possibly History and English. I visited earlier this summer, and while I didn't get to see every college, I think that I liked Brasenose, New, Magdalen, Merton the most. However, I feel like the fact that I enjoyed these is keeping me from really looking into other colleges.

I want a college (ugh is this what filling out a dating site profile is like?) that's centrally located, has a 24 hour library, has pretty old buildings, and offers accomodation for the entirety of one's degree. (either on college or centrally located - or not.)

Also, I don't know if this is the right thread for this question but I've looked at the course outline for History and English, and it seems to be very History orientated, anyone can confirm this?
thanks
Original post by Islands-onsunday

I want a college (ugh is this what filling out a dating site profile is like?) that's centrally located, has a 24 hour library, has pretty old buildings, and offers accomodation for the entirety of one's degree. (either on college or centrally located - or not.)

That's quite a lot of colleges. Do you have any other criteria, no matter how small or silly?

EDIT: unless lots of colleges don't offer your subject, which seems to be the case for 3 of the 4 you mentioned!

Merton's library is open 8am-12pm i think. Possibly earlier, but not 24 hours.
(edited 10 years ago)

Quick Reply

Latest