unregistered users can no longer post messages
Watch
Announcements
This discussion is closed.
Report
#21
(Original post by Mr White)
It's a shame though - who are we supposed to demean now that the unregistereds have been removed?
It's a shame though - who are we supposed to demean now that the unregistereds have been removed?

0
Report
#22
(Original post by Mr White)
It's a shame though - who are we supposed to demean now that the unregistereds have been removed?
It's a shame though - who are we supposed to demean now that the unregistereds have been removed?

0
(Original post by Elle)
Lol.. have you been reading the Handmaid's Tale Mr White?
Lol.. have you been reading the Handmaid's Tale Mr White?
0
Report
#27
(Original post by Mr White)
As much as was neccessary to pass GCSE English. What was the first quote, I don't recall intentionally doing that.
As much as was neccessary to pass GCSE English. What was the first quote, I don't recall intentionally doing that.
Well it wasn't really a quote.. just the whole issue of if you prefer freedom to or freedom from.. lol

0
Report
#29
(Original post by emom100)
not everyone has the time to post lots though. How did you manaage to get over 2000?
not everyone has the time to post lots though. How did you manaage to get over 2000?

0
(Original post by edders)
users with low post-counts?
users with low post-counts?

I was under the impression that the reason that d did not ban unregistered users until now was economic - apparently this site does not pay for itself and unregistereds provide most of the traffic. I wonder what convinced him to change his mind?
0
Report
#32
(Original post by Golz)
this is good. no more unregistereds can swear at me now
this is good. no more unregistereds can swear at me now
0
Report
#34
(Original post by Mr White)
Touche.
I was under the impression that the reason that d did not ban unregistered users until now was economic - apparently this site does not pay for itself and unregistereds provide most of the traffic. I wonder what convinced him to change his mind?
Touche.
I was under the impression that the reason that d did not ban unregistered users until now was economic - apparently this site does not pay for itself and unregistereds provide most of the traffic. I wonder what convinced him to change his mind?

0
Report
#35
(Original post by Mr White)
Touche.
I was under the impression that the reason that d did not ban unregistered users until now was economic - apparently this site does not pay for itself and unregistereds provide most of the traffic. I wonder what convinced him to change his mind?
Touche.
I was under the impression that the reason that d did not ban unregistered users until now was economic - apparently this site does not pay for itself and unregistereds provide most of the traffic. I wonder what convinced him to change his mind?
0
(Original post by Bhaal85)
that DAMN harry potter thread
that DAMN harry potter thread
0
Report
#37
(Original post by edders)
a bucket-load of spam and the mods who were bored of deleting it. you can't see how much rubbish has been posted on this forum up till now. i don't think there will be any reduction in traffic, there'll just be more registered users, which is a good thing. it's no trouble to register (2 mins max)
a bucket-load of spam and the mods who were bored of deleting it. you can't see how much rubbish has been posted on this forum up till now. i don't think there will be any reduction in traffic, there'll just be more registered users, which is a good thing. it's no trouble to register (2 mins max)
0
Report
#38
(Original post by Mr White)
Whatever happened to that General Election thread?
Whatever happened to that General Election thread?

0
Report
#40
(Original post by Recusant)
sorry guys, looks like they're back
*looks at thread by "Pissinabout"*
sorry guys, looks like they're back

*looks at thread by "Pissinabout"*

0
X
new posts
Back
to top
to top