Announcements
9 years ago
#41
(Original post by GHOSH-5)
Not sure about the bit I've boxed. for some integer n.
Indeed, but the terms (and the others) correspond to .
0
9 years ago
#42
STEP II, Question 5

Spoiler:
Show
Tangents from the same point are equal.

Therefore we can write the side lengths as

The radius of the incircle will be (since there is a right angle at A, so tangents from a will be //el to the radius).

Therefore as required.

Since is right angled at A, the radius of the circumcircle will be .

Therefore:

So

But since (Pythagoras' theorem)

So we have

Considering this as a quadratic in q

Therefore

So
1
9 years ago
#43
STEP III, Question 8

Spoiler:
Show

By Pythagoras' theorem

Since is self inverse, we need only show one direction.

Since is tangent, substituting from before

as required.

By hypothesis,

Taking the difference and expanding

Dividing by (hence )

and we're done
0
9 years ago
#44
lulz

I just got negged for my solution to STEP III q.1.

Apparently my graphs are not up to the exacting standards that TSR requires.
0
9 years ago
#45
II/10:

:)
Equating the vertical displacements, remembering that the anti-missile missile travels a time t-T seconds:

The horizontal distances will add to 180: , and solving these simultaneously gives T = 1.
0
9 years ago
#46
STEP I 2005 Question 10:

First part
Spoiler:
Show

From A colliding with B:

Let represent the velocity of A after colliding with A.

1. NEL:

2. CLM:

Substitute into 1.:

3.

From B colliding with C:

Let represent the velocity of B after colliding with C.

4. NEL:

5. CLM:

Substitute into 4.:

6.

Now, substitute 3. into 6.:

i)
Spoiler:
Show

Use 6.:

For v, use 3.:

ii)
Spoiler:
Show

Use 6.:

Use 3.:

0
8 years ago
#47
(Original post by SimonM)
STEP III, Question 3

Spoiler:
Show

Comparing coefficients, we have

Therefore if we can find suitable values for we have:

If a,b,c satisfy those equations, then we can solve simultaneously to find p,r,s and take q to be whatever value we need.

Expanding

This clearly satisfies our equation, so we're done.

so it satisfies our equation.

Therefore:

Therefore we have

Therefore
In particular:
(Original post by SimonM)

This clearly satisfies our equation, so we're done.
I have just done this question and for the part above (in the same way as the first part) I got simultaneous equations and found the condition on a, b and c, which turned out to be the same as in the first part. I'm just wondering how you could tell that it "clearly satisfies our equation". What have I missed?

Thanks
0
8 years ago
#48
0
8 years ago
#49
(Original post by SimonM)
ok, thanks, that's pretty obvious really
0
8 years ago
#50
(Original post by Unbounded)
STEP I, Question 3, 2005
(i)

So there are two distinct real roots if, and only if, a and b are both positive or both negative. Q.E.D.
(ii)

There is exactly one real solution when the discriminant of this quadratic in x is equal to zero.

Noting that c^2 is nonzero and real,

But also that

Good solution, but how do we know c^2>0? Surely c^2=0 is a possibility?
0
8 years ago
#51
(Original post by Unbounded)
I recall they told us that c is non-zero.
They told us c does not equal one, so c could equal zero. I believe I have a good argument why c cannot equal zero, but you might like to look for it yourself. (As your solutions show you're a cut above me at this STEP lark, so I'm sure you'll find it, but i'm fairly sure your solution is incomplete).
0
8 years ago
#52
(Original post by Unbounded)
I recall they told us that c is non-zero.
It doesn't, you need to exclude the possibility that c = 0 seperately
0
8 years ago
#53
It's actually quite a nice contradiction..
0
8 years ago
#54
(Original post by Unbounded)
Ah apologies:

Suppose that c = 0, then the equation for (ii) becomes exactly the same as (i). Hence we require a and b to both be positive or negative. Then the condition of exactly one root, which is no longer holds, since the LHS is zero whereas the RHS is negative - contradiction. Hence c is non-zero.

Cheers for pointing this out - I'll edit the solution post.
No problem, I still have one small qualm though. In the case c=0, if a or b=0, then surely there is only one solution, x=0?

Also out of curiosity, how many marks would you (or someone else) estimate your original solution would have got out of 20? I ask because its the kind of overlook I make all the time.
0
8 years ago
#55
(Original post by Unbounded)
We in fact are told a and b are non-zero.
I'd be surprised to lose more than 3 marks.
So we are told that, my turn to overlook what the question tells us
0
8 years ago
#56
When I did the question I used the argument that if c = 0, then we must have ab =0, which is impossible as a and b are both non-zero. I also think it would've been around 2-3 marks.
0
8 years ago
#57
I also think that the solution to the final part of I question 7 can be simplified further by expanding the sine function.
0
8 years ago
#58
(Original post by Sk1lLz)
STEP I 2005 Question 10:

First part
Spoiler:
Show

From A colliding with B:

Let represent the velocity of A after colliding with A.

1. NEL:

2. CLM:

Substitute into 1.:

3.

From B colliding with C:

Let represent the velocity of B after colliding with C.

4. NEL:

5. CLM:

Substitute into 4.:

6.

Now, substitute 3. into 6.:

i)
Spoiler:
Show

Use 6.:

For v, use 3.:

ii)
Spoiler:
Show

Use 6.:

Use 3.:

I don't agree with this. I think you've misread the question. It asks you to find the final velocities of each of the three particles but haven't you just found the final velocity of C and the initial velocity of B following the collision with A?
From your solution, the final velocities of A and B are and but you didn't solve for them. I'll post the remainder of the solution after college.
0
8 years ago
#59
(Original post by SimonM)
...
STEP II, Q9

(i)
Diagram

Consider the particles individually when they are at the point of slipping upwards.

Considering A:
Resolving perpendicular to the slope:

Resolving parallel to the slope: by subbing in from above and rearranging.

Considering B:
Resolving perpendicular to the slope:

Resolving parallel to the slope: by subbing in from above and rearranging.

Expressing in the form gives it to be equivalent to .

Note that this implies that , which is minimised when is maximised i.e. when .

Therefore and P must act at an angle of to the horizontal i.e. parallel to the slope.

(ii)
If the particles are not sliding down the slope then they are either on the point of slipping down it or moving up it. We've considered the latter in part (i) so we need to find the smallest value of P for which the system is at the point of slipping downwards. If you were to draw a diagram for this, it would be the same as the one for part (i) except the frictional forces will be acting in the opposite direction.

Considering A:
Resolving perpendicular to the slope:

Resolving parallel to the slope:

Considering B:
Resolving perpendicular to the slope:

Resolving parallel to the slope:

Note that .

Therefore in this case. This is smaller than the answer to part (i), therefore is the correct answer.
0
8 years ago
#60
(Original post by SimonM)
...
That was a long one!
STEP II, Q11
First part
Diagram

Where is the tension in the string, A is the object on the slope and B is the hanging object. (I chose not to use the conventional because this letter is assigned to something else later on)

Considering B:
Resolving downwards:

Considering A
Resolving perpendicular to the slope:

Resolving parallel to the slope:

Note that:
Useful triangle

Using SOHCAHTOA on this triangle yields that:

Therefore using these results and subbing into :
as required.

Second part
Considering the velocity, , of A at the point where the string breaks:

Therefore, using :

.

In this case, A can be modelled as follows:
Diagram

Where is the acceleration of A after the string breaks.

Resolving perpendicular to the slope:

Resolving down the slope:

Considering the motion of A between the time where the string breaks and the particle reaches it's maximum height (let this time be denoted by :

Therefore using :

Note that the time taken (after release) to reach maximum height is given by:

Third part
Let the maximum displacement of the particle be denoted by ; let the distance between the initial position and the position at which the string breaks be and let the distance between the string's breaking position and the maximum height of motion be such that

Considering upwards motion for the distance :

,

Therefore, using :

Considering upwards motion from to :

Therefore, using :

Note that, by resolving forces of the object when it is at it's maximum height, the acceleration down the slope is .

Considering motion down the slope from max height to initial position:

Therefore, using :

1
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### University open days

• Arts University Bournemouth
Art and Design Foundation Diploma Further education
Sat, 25 May '19
• SOAS University of London
Wed, 29 May '19
• University of Exeter
Thu, 30 May '19

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### How did your AQA GCSE Physics Paper 1 go?

Loved the paper - Feeling positive (351)
30.6%
The paper was reasonable (460)
40.1%
Not feeling great about that exam... (197)
17.18%
It was TERRIBLE (139)
12.12%