This thread is closed

Scroll to see replies

So hold on....is it as follows:

Given a sample of a population, with standard deviation: s...

the standard deviation of the whole population = s/root(n)

the standard error in the mean is the standard deviation of the whole population divided by root(n-1)

is that right?

What about when the error is just the standard deviation? Is that ever the case?

Given a sample of a population, with standard deviation: s...

the standard deviation of the whole population = s/root(n)

the standard error in the mean is the standard deviation of the whole population divided by root(n-1)

is that right?

What about when the error is just the standard deviation? Is that ever the case?

HELP!

I'm getting thoroughly frustrated at a question here, please please someone help I really cant see how to keep this simple:

-------

By considering the zero momentum frame for a collision between a mass m1, at speed v (in the lab frame) and a stationary (in the lab frame) mass m2, calculate the fraction of initial kinetic energy transferred to the mass m2.

--------

It's driving me crazy cos I just get stuck in a mess of algebra. Someone please help!

I'm getting thoroughly frustrated at a question here, please please someone help I really cant see how to keep this simple:

-------

By considering the zero momentum frame for a collision between a mass m1, at speed v (in the lab frame) and a stationary (in the lab frame) mass m2, calculate the fraction of initial kinetic energy transferred to the mass m2.

--------

It's driving me crazy cos I just get stuck in a mess of algebra. Someone please help!

Willa

-------

By considering the zero momentum frame for a collision between a mass m1, at speed v (in the lab frame) and a stationary (in the lab frame) mass m2, calculate the fraction of initial kinetic energy transferred to the mass m2.

--------

By considering the zero momentum frame for a collision between a mass m1, at speed v (in the lab frame) and a stationary (in the lab frame) mass m2, calculate the fraction of initial kinetic energy transferred to the mass m2.

--------

In the ZMF (zero-momentum...), particle 1 has speed $u_1=v-\frac{m_1v}{m_1+m_2}=\frac{m_2v}{m_1+m_2}$, and particle 2 has speed $u_2=-\frac{m_1 u_1}{m_2}=-\frac{m_1v}{m_1+m_2}$.

Now use the energy and linear momentum conservation equations:

$m_1u_1+m_2u_2=m_1v_1+m_2v_2$

$m_1u_1^2+m_2u_2^2=m_1v_1^2+m_2v_2^2$

You know u_2 in terms of u_1, so you can eliminate v_1 and v_2 from the 2 equations. The algebra is generally a bit messy, but just plough through the working, making sure that your main aim is to eliminate variables, convert back into lab frame, and calculate kinetic energies, as required.

What I say may be obvious, but the key thing is not to mess around with variables, just try and eliminate them! Keep track of which variables are known, and which ones you are trying to determine in terms of these known variables.

LennonMcCartney

In the ZMF (zero-momentum...), particle 1 has speed $u_1=v-\frac{m_1v}{m_1+m_2}=\frac{m_2v}{m_1+m_2}$, and particle 2 has speed $u_2=-u_1$.

but they're different masses so u2 doesn't equal -u1 - you need no momentum so doesn't $m_1 u_1 = -m_2 u_2\ so\ u_2 = -\frac{m_1 u_1}{m_2}$

Bezza

but they're different masses so u2 doesn't equal -u1 - you need no momentum so doesn't $m_1 u_1 = -m_2 u_2\ so\ u_2 = -\frac{m_1 u_1}{m_2}$

Sorry, yes, me being silly. He is correct of course, but the point is that u_2 can be written as a known function of u_1.

That is the problem with mechanics, you can never really tell if you're doing it right or not. But if the velocities fit the equations, then it must be correct.

Yes. I tend to remember that

$x'=\gamma(x-\beta ct)$ and

$ct'=\gamma(ct-\beta x)$

for the symmetry of it and the easier application to energy and momentum. And to switch the dashes, just replace $\beta$ with $- \beta$.

$x'=\gamma(x-\beta ct)$ and

$ct'=\gamma(ct-\beta x)$

for the symmetry of it and the easier application to energy and momentum. And to switch the dashes, just replace $\beta$ with $- \beta$.

OK I'm trying to analyse a situation in two different ways which should give the same answers but arent!

I have a rocket moving at speed 2c/3 and it emits a photon from x' which travels to the origin and then back to x' again. This obviously means t' = 2x'/c

So I want to see what time the stationary observer records, and using the standrd equation: t = gamma(t' + vx'/c^2) I obtain 4t'/root(5)

Now I wanted to check that this corresponded to length contraction, so I imagined the stationary observer seeing the rocket to be length x. That means that the first leg of the photon journey is t=x/(c+v) because it the photons relative speed to the rocket is c+v. And then adding on the return journey, t=x/(c+v) + x/(c-v)

substitute in the value for v above, to get: t=3x/5c + 3x/c = 18x/5c

But that should equal the previous calculated t, so 18x/5c = 4t'/root(5) = 8x'/croot(5)

so x = x' * (40/18root(5))

but using the standard transformation, that factor should be gamma = 3/root(5)

so where's my mistake!?

I have a rocket moving at speed 2c/3 and it emits a photon from x' which travels to the origin and then back to x' again. This obviously means t' = 2x'/c

So I want to see what time the stationary observer records, and using the standrd equation: t = gamma(t' + vx'/c^2) I obtain 4t'/root(5)

Now I wanted to check that this corresponded to length contraction, so I imagined the stationary observer seeing the rocket to be length x. That means that the first leg of the photon journey is t=x/(c+v) because it the photons relative speed to the rocket is c+v. And then adding on the return journey, t=x/(c+v) + x/(c-v)

substitute in the value for v above, to get: t=3x/5c + 3x/c = 18x/5c

But that should equal the previous calculated t, so 18x/5c = 4t'/root(5) = 8x'/croot(5)

so x = x' * (40/18root(5))

but using the standard transformation, that factor should be gamma = 3/root(5)

so where's my mistake!?

Try hyperphysics. Look that up in google, and it should give you some ideas.

LennonMcCartney

Try hyperphysics. Look that up in google, and it should give you some ideas.

No that hasnt really helped me, I'm still confused. I can't do this subject damn it, why is nothing going right for me.....I couldnt do chemistry and computing, physics was my one strength, and now I can't even do that

And my rowing coach this week seems to be picking on me which makes me feel like I can't row either....and these new blades (shiny as they are) are causing a whole set of new blisters. Hmmmmpth nothing is going right for me

And with my first exam on monday, I am so underprepared that I'm gonna barely be able to answer any of the questions. This sucks, and it's all my fault!

Aww! Will, chill out! OK so this is a fairly tense time of the year. Worry a little bit, but not too much. Make sure to take plenty of breaks, just for yourself, where you don't worry, don't revise, don't do anything stressful.

I dont have time to take breaks, I've taken too many breaks already! I dont have the time to revise enough to get a good mark in these exams - well at least a mark which represents what I think I can achieve. I'm only just getting the hang of some modules, and I reckon I dont have time to learn entire chunks of some of them!

Ok last minute panic time! I have two questions that I'd really appreciate answering:

1) Rotational Dynamics: How do I prove that L = Lcm + c^p. I've seen the proof, but don't understand why some terms are zero and can thus be ignored.

2) "Show the quantity x^2 - (ct)^2 is a Lorentz invariant" [Q7. Physics1 1999]

Thanks guys! Hopen your compsci is going well Will....we're thinking of you!

1) Rotational Dynamics: How do I prove that L = Lcm + c^p. I've seen the proof, but don't understand why some terms are zero and can thus be ignored.

2) "Show the quantity x^2 - (ct)^2 is a Lorentz invariant" [Q7. Physics1 1999]

Thanks guys! Hopen your compsci is going well Will....we're thinking of you!

- Higher prelim results
- N5 prelims please help
- Revising for prelims
- 4 Advanced Highers?
- How to revise these Highers?
- 6As at Higher SQA
- Is anyone else doing National 5 physics??
- Advanced Higher Mechanics
- UCAS Clearing 2023 FAQ and Help Megathread
- Got a Ucas or results related question? Ask a Clearing and Applications Advisor here
- 2023 SQA Grade Prediction
- Prelims
- Introduction
- Revision for a month before exam and a day before exam
- Prelims result
- S6 Student Thread 2022
- National 5 exams
- National 5 exams
- Getting an A in Higher Chemistry,Maths and Human Biology
- SQA Higher Exam Advice - Subject Specific

- Human Sciences Oxford applicants 2023-2024
- Oxford PPE Interviews for 2024 entry
- Oxford Chemistry interview questions
- Oxford materials science
- 2024 Oxford New College Interview Invites
- Oxford Interview Notification
- Fine Art at the Ruskin Oxford 2024
- Mat 2023
- Hat 2023
- Oxford Economics and Management Interview 2024
- Has anyone heard back from Oxford for Maths?
- Oxford 2024 Physics Entry
- Oxford Chemistry 2024 Entry
- Oxford language applicants - 2024 entry
- Oxford maths interview
- TSA Section 1 2023 / Oxford E&M (2024 entry) thread
- oxford interviews
- Extra MAT 2023
- Oxford Interviews 2024 History of Art
- Oxford University Law Interview Shortlisting

- DWP Work Coach Interview - how long to hear
- University of Oxford 2024 Undergraduate Applicants Official Thread
- Sevenoaks School sixth form entrance
- Official: Kent and Medway Medical School A100 2024 entry
- 2024 entry A100 / A101 Medicine fastest and slowest offer senders
- The Liverpool FC Thread XVII
- 2024 deloitte bright start apprenticeship 2024
- New Thread Experience Feedback - Official Thread
- Official: University of Plymouth A102 (BMBS with Foundation (Year 0)) 2024 Entry
- is it selfish of me

- Driving test nerves
- Official: University of Cambridge A101 Applicant and Offer Holder thread 2023 Entry
- Should I bother applying to Oxford?
- Can I go to uni through Ucas points if i do 1 btec and 2 alevels
- NICS Staff Officer and Deputy Principal recruitment 2022 2023
- Room available in London (Uol Students Only)
- Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2024 Thread
- The Official Cambridge Applicants for 2024 Entry Thread
- so confusing HEEEELP
- BDO grad scheme 2024

- The current situation in Israel/Gaza is having an impact on my friendships
- Official: University of Cardiff A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- GSK Future Leaders Program 2024
- University of Cambridge Foundation Year 2024
- I'm sooooooo lost
- SIP civil service 2024 thread
- Manchester met vs Cardiff met!
- Idea Silver Maker Two Badge (Coding)
- Live in halls next year or try get a house
- learn direct : nursing

- Courtauld and UCL History of Art Application
- Official: University of Surrey A101 2024 Entry Applicants
- The daily Wordle puzzle thread!
- ucas
- Official Imperial College London Offer Holders Thread for 2024 entry
- Masters at Bath or Birmingham? Psychology.
- Second degree funding
- 3rd year is really harder than I thought
- Teacher training following undergraduate 3 year course
- No Entry penalties