This thread is closed

Scroll to see replies

LennonMcCartney

I think you can (as I just did...I didn't even go to any lectures, I learnt it from scratch all in one day and the one past paper doesn't look to bad, and am not too bothered, anyway).

I'm going to have to spend all day cramming after not getting anything done yesterday (partly my own fault, but also due to other people thinking it would be more productive to work in my room....not sensible!). Luckily today is going to be far more constructive since most of them are in exams/library and I'm going to work in someone else's room (I know that sounds hypocritical!) but they've finished there exams but have other stuff to do and will make sure I work!!!!

Btw, there are actually two past papers if you search carefully enough on the physics homepage - june 03 & june 04!

voila!

Ok guys v.quick question (this is Chloé btw on Simon's account!!!):

In the "penguins" notes, he said:

p = hbar/a

thus min KE = p^{2}÷2m

therefore: KE = h^{2} ÷ 2ma^{2}

surely this is a mistake? shouldn't it be hbar in the second equation (or is it the first one that's wrong, ie. p=h/a)? Thanks

Ok guys v.quick question (this is Chloé btw on Simon's account!!!):

In the "penguins" notes, he said:

p = hbar/a

thus min KE = p

therefore: KE = h

surely this is a mistake? shouldn't it be hbar in the second equation (or is it the first one that's wrong, ie. p=h/a)? Thanks

oxymoron

voila!

Ok guys v.quick question (this is Chloé btw on Simon's account!!!):

In the "penguins" notes, he said:

p = hbar/a

thus min KE = p^{2}÷2m

therefore: KE = h^{2} ÷ 2ma^{2}

surely this is a mistake? shouldn't it be hbar in the second equation (or is it the first one that's wrong, ie. p=h/a)? Thanks

Ok guys v.quick question (this is Chloé btw on Simon's account!!!):

In the "penguins" notes, he said:

p = hbar/a

thus min KE = p

therefore: KE = h

surely this is a mistake? shouldn't it be hbar in the second equation (or is it the first one that's wrong, ie. p=h/a)? Thanks

I think its one of these fudge things. In that h and hbar are at the moment pretty interchangeable. The real value is I think hbar/2a or similar but its all orders of magnitude and so on so they tend to get exchanged. obviously h > hbar and so it definitely meets the uncertainty prinicple. So yes it is correct - just fudged. Just learn it as it is I say.

Edit: remmeber he calculated the value in the optical microscope as h/a not hbar/a. thats what hes used -as I said all very fudged. mmm tasty

$\hat{p}=-i\hbar\nabla$, so that the commutation relation rule is satisfied:

Unparseable latex formula:

. And since KE: $T=p^2/2m$ from classical mechanics, we say the operator for kinetic energy in quantum mechanics is: $\hat{T}=\hat{p}^2/2m=\frac{-\hbar^2}{2m}\nabla^{2}$, which agree with what we've been told in one dimension.[\hat{p},{\hat{x}]=i\hbar

OK, what is a?

EDIT: We're clearly talking about fairly different things (although not *really* different) but I just got up, so don't blame me.

EDIT: We're clearly talking about fairly different things (although not *really* different) but I just got up, so don't blame me.

you're confusing me (still Chloé on simon's account)

Right, could someone help me with all these questions? thanks:

====

Q1. June 2003

To calculate the maximum energy of the ejected electrons don we actually need to work out the intensity of the light source or do w ejust work out the energy from the wavelength and the minimum energy required?

How do I do the next bit?

====

====

Q4. June 2003

I'm stuck on what to do for the bit where we have to show that the results for the infinite potential well are consistent with the uncertainty principle. I know it can't have zero kinetic energy but how am I supposed to show it and how do I use the other results for the wave function?

====

Thanks guys, i'd better go now as simon's moanin at me for taking so long to type on his silly laptop! Sorry for all the questions - i just don't get this topic!

Right, could someone help me with all these questions? thanks:

====

Q1. June 2003

To calculate the maximum energy of the ejected electrons don we actually need to work out the intensity of the light source or do w ejust work out the energy from the wavelength and the minimum energy required?

How do I do the next bit?

====

====

Q4. June 2003

I'm stuck on what to do for the bit where we have to show that the results for the infinite potential well are consistent with the uncertainty principle. I know it can't have zero kinetic energy but how am I supposed to show it and how do I use the other results for the wave function?

====

Thanks guys, i'd better go now as simon's moanin at me for taking so long to type on his silly laptop! Sorry for all the questions - i just don't get this topic!

oxymoron

you're confusing me (still Chloé on simon's account)

Right, could someone help me with all these questions? thanks:

====

Q1. June 2003

To calculate the maximum energy of the ejected electrons don we actually need to work out the intensity of the light source or do w ejust work out the energy from the wavelength and the minimum energy required?

How do I do the next bit?

====

====

Q4. June 2003

I'm stuck on what to do for the bit where we have to show that the results for the infinite potential well are consistent with the uncertainty principle. I know it can't have zero kinetic energy but how am I supposed to show it and how do I use the other results for the wave function?

====

Thanks guys, i'd better go now as simon's moanin at me for taking so long to type on his silly laptop! Sorry for all the questions - i just don't get this topic!

Right, could someone help me with all these questions? thanks:

====

Q1. June 2003

To calculate the maximum energy of the ejected electrons don we actually need to work out the intensity of the light source or do w ejust work out the energy from the wavelength and the minimum energy required?

How do I do the next bit?

====

====

Q4. June 2003

I'm stuck on what to do for the bit where we have to show that the results for the infinite potential well are consistent with the uncertainty principle. I know it can't have zero kinetic energy but how am I supposed to show it and how do I use the other results for the wave function?

====

Thanks guys, i'd better go now as simon's moanin at me for taking so long to type on his silly laptop! Sorry for all the questions - i just don't get this topic!

Q4 first -

for a start we know delta x = 2a

delta p = hbar k = hbar n pi/ (2a) from the schrodinger equation. Multiply the 2 together and you get h/2

hence meets uncertainty principle.

Also KE = hbar^2 pi^2 /( 8ma^2) for ground state.

ie n must be an integer >= to 1.

hence there is a zero point energy - a minimum energy of the system

For Q1 you do 2 calculations - 1 quantum 1 classical

for quantum use E=hf and take difference.ie energy of photon is 2.81 eV - 2.3 eV of energy level difference = 0.51 eV of KE.

for classical - light is emitted spherically.

Intensity is power/ Area for the light emitted at the source

also power = W/t

so I = W/ta4pi where a is radius of the atom and w is the energy needed to eject it

then P/4pir^2 = W/ta4pi equating intensity a distance r away with intensity needed to eject electron.

rearrange for t bang it in and it should be around 10 hours.

F1 fanatic

Q4 first -

for a start we know delta x = 2a

delta p = hbar k = hbar n pi/ (2a) from the schrodinger equation. Multiply the 2 together and you get h/2

for a start we know delta x = 2a

delta p = hbar k = hbar n pi/ (2a) from the schrodinger equation. Multiply the 2 together and you get h/2

Woah! Surely if u multiply $\Delta x$ and $\Delta p$ you'll get hbar*n*$\pi$?

hence meets uncertainty principle.

Also KE = hbar^2 pi^2 /( 8ma^2) for ground state.

How do we know there's an 8 on the bottom? usually we have a 2...sorry I know I'm being very dense!!!

Thanks for all your help Stu

oxymoron

Woah! Surely if u multiply $\Delta x$ and $\Delta p$ you'll get hbar*n*$\pi$?

hence meets uncertainty principle.

How do we know there's an 8 on the bottom? usually we have a 2...sorry I know I'm being very dense!!!

Thanks for all your help Stu

hence meets uncertainty principle.

How do we know there's an 8 on the bottom? usually we have a 2...sorry I know I'm being very dense!!!

Thanks for all your help Stu

well yes it is but the minimum is when n=1 so if it applies then it applies at all other. and hbar = h/2pi ==> hbar n pi = h/2 which may or may not have been what I said before.

8 at bottom - *cos its in his notes* no erm... cos its (2a)^2 which is 4 *2 that is usually there. hence 8.

Right - Im now going to try the unheard of trick of cramming quantum mechanics in 6 hours having done practically none up to this point. Thankfully its my speciality and so I already kind of get it. Wish me luck

F1 fanatic

Right - Im now going to try the unheard of trick of cramming quantum mechanics in 6 hours having done practically none up to this point. Thankfully its my speciality and so I already kind of get it. Wish me luck

Thanks ever so much Stu...I don't know why you're worried about the exam...you've been helping me!!! Thanks ever so much.

oxymoron

Why is Schrodinger equation compatible with the experimental results for matter waves?

Well it has quantities that are both matter like and wave like. ie mass and wavelength. Also it is a wave equation for particles. Thats what it is. It works on probability waves. It has been tested by experiment and matches pretty much perfectly. Hence its compatible.

The probability function gives the probability wave for a particle - ie the chance of finding it in a particular place. the particle is defined by a wave function.

Hence all compatible.

Im gonna keep off here for the rest of the afternoon so if you have any more questions that no one else will answer MSN erise me.

Cos of units and a good guess.

It's like asking, "Why should F be proportional to d(mv)/dt? Randomly put it in, why don't you!" That was a guess, and it worked. So did L=n\hbar. As did the Schrodinger equation, choices for operators etc

It's like asking, "Why should F be proportional to d(mv)/dt? Randomly put it in, why don't you!" That was a guess, and it worked. So did L=n\hbar. As did the Schrodinger equation, choices for operators etc

Nikking

lol. why wouldn't it?

because then you wouldn't get the discrete energy levels that you need for emission spectra

and why should an electron emit radiation when being accelerated? It's all good telling us it does, but WHY??

(join audioscrobbler.com)

LennonMcCartney

Cos of units and a good guess.

It's like asking, "Why should F be proportional to d(mv)/dt? Randomly put it in, why don't you!" That was a guess, and it worked. So did L=n\hbar. As did the Schrodinger equation, choices for operators etc

It's like asking, "Why should F be proportional to d(mv)/dt? Randomly put it in, why don't you!" That was a guess, and it worked. So did L=n\hbar. As did the Schrodinger equation, choices for operators etc

Hmmm, why should F = ma? You've made me wonder that now!! Out the window goes quantum!

Do you never wonder why any of the stuff they teach us!!?

Bezza

because then you wouldn't get the discrete energy levels that you need for emission spectra

that's just how you make an em wave - don't know a better explanation i'm afraid. in a transmitter you just have an ac current and the accn of the electrons leads to em waves.

I use cds

that's just how you make an em wave - don't know a better explanation i'm afraid. in a transmitter you just have an ac current and the accn of the electrons leads to em waves.

I use cds

Gotta give it to you,

your a dude, I'd rep you if it was worth something.

- Higher prelim results
- N5 prelims please help
- Revising for prelims
- 4 Advanced Highers?
- 6As at Higher SQA
- How to revise these Highers?
- Is anyone else doing National 5 physics??
- Advanced Higher Mechanics
- UCAS Clearing 2023 FAQ and Help Megathread
- Got a Ucas or results related question? Ask a Clearing and Applications Advisor here
- 2023 SQA Grade Prediction
- Prelims
- S6 Student Thread 2022
- Introduction
- National 5 exams
- Prelims result
- Revision for a month before exam and a day before exam
- National 5 exams
- Getting an A in Higher Chemistry,Maths and Human Biology
- SQA Higher Exam Advice - Subject Specific

- Human Sciences Oxford applicants 2023-2024
- Trinity college Oxford undergraduate 2024 interviews
- Oxford PPE Interviews for 2024 entry
- can i get into oxford with BBC
- TSA Section 1 2023 / Oxford E&M (2024 entry) thread
- Fine Art at the Ruskin Oxford 2024
- Oxford Chemistry interview questions
- Oxford materials science
- 2024 Oxford New College Interview Invites
- Oxford Interview Notification
- Mat 2023
- Hat 2023
- Oxford Economics and Management Interview 2024
- Has anyone heard back from Oxford for Maths?
- Oxford 2024 Physics Entry
- Oxford Chemistry 2024 Entry
- Oxford language applicants - 2024 entry
- Oxford maths interview
- oxford interviews
- Extra MAT 2023

- University of Oxford 2024 Undergraduate Applicants Official Thread
- Lost my GCSE certificate From Years Ago
- History A levels
- Southampton Vs QMUL for History and Politics
- Girls Vs. Boys (Part 45)
- Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2024 Thread
- Official Thread: Graduate Entry Medicine 2024 Entry
- Civil Service 3-Month Footprint Rule
- Oxford College hurt/heal
- Higher Photography 2024

- Exam Board Hurt or Heal Game
- Official Veterinary Medicine Applicants thread 2024 entry
- A Level Chemistry Exam Question-need help!
- Are you working over the Christmas period?
- The Russell Group hurt/heal game (Part 5)
- The Sports Hurt/heal game
- The honorable non-russell group hurt/heal game
- British food hurt/heal game!
- The Cambridge College Hurt/Heal Game [part 2]
- Breakfast items hurt/heal game!

- The Forum Games Hurt/Heal Game
- 2023 ** Borders and Enforcement, Crime & Compliance - ICE - Immigration Officers
- Does this count a resiting A levels ?
- "Can't you hear me, S.O.S.?": TLG's PhD study blog!
- Official: Newcastle University A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- best time to approach a girl
- EY graduate scheme 2024
- What's the most overrated Christmas song?
- 🌼🍉 Brownies, books and planning a wedding - your favourite fiancés’ 2nd blog 🍉🌼
- The Official King's College London Applicants for 2024 Entry Thread

- Rishi Sunak relaunches plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda
- Looking for 2/3 new flatmates in london to search for a flat for January
- Atkins Graduate 2024
- Coordinate Geometry - A-level Mathematics
- Christmas wish list as a creative student at Kingston
- Tesco festive colleague
- Do you have an advent calendar?
- Have i missed my opportunity
- AstraZeneca Graduate Schemes UK 2024
- The G20 Leaders Hurt/Heal Game

- University of Oxford 2024 Undergraduate Applicants Official Thread
- Lost my GCSE certificate From Years Ago
- History A levels
- Southampton Vs QMUL for History and Politics
- Girls Vs. Boys (Part 45)
- Official Cambridge Postgraduate Applicants 2024 Thread
- Official Thread: Graduate Entry Medicine 2024 Entry
- Civil Service 3-Month Footprint Rule
- Oxford College hurt/heal
- Higher Photography 2024

- Exam Board Hurt or Heal Game
- Official Veterinary Medicine Applicants thread 2024 entry
- A Level Chemistry Exam Question-need help!
- Are you working over the Christmas period?
- The Russell Group hurt/heal game (Part 5)
- The Sports Hurt/heal game
- The honorable non-russell group hurt/heal game
- British food hurt/heal game!
- The Cambridge College Hurt/Heal Game [part 2]
- Breakfast items hurt/heal game!

- The Forum Games Hurt/Heal Game
- 2023 ** Borders and Enforcement, Crime & Compliance - ICE - Immigration Officers
- Does this count a resiting A levels ?
- "Can't you hear me, S.O.S.?": TLG's PhD study blog!
- Official: Newcastle University A100 2024 Entry Applicants
- best time to approach a girl
- EY graduate scheme 2024
- What's the most overrated Christmas song?
- 🌼🍉 Brownies, books and planning a wedding - your favourite fiancés’ 2nd blog 🍉🌼
- The Official King's College London Applicants for 2024 Entry Thread

- Rishi Sunak relaunches plans to send asylum seekers to Rwanda
- Looking for 2/3 new flatmates in london to search for a flat for January
- Atkins Graduate 2024
- Coordinate Geometry - A-level Mathematics
- Christmas wish list as a creative student at Kingston
- Tesco festive colleague
- Do you have an advent calendar?
- Have i missed my opportunity
- AstraZeneca Graduate Schemes UK 2024
- The G20 Leaders Hurt/Heal Game