Go to first unread
Back
to top
Homophobia
Watch
Announcements
This discussion is closed.
Report
#21
(Original post by armatillian)
lol - wot a wonderful argument - u h8 gays so u must be gay.
so i spose in h8in racists peadaphiles n rapists that also makes me by ure arguments a racist who wants 2 have sex wiith children and rape anythin out there.
i wonder wot we all r if we r wot we h8 then
lol - wot a wonderful argument - u h8 gays so u must be gay.
so i spose in h8in racists peadaphiles n rapists that also makes me by ure arguments a racist who wants 2 have sex wiith children and rape anythin out there.
i wonder wot we all r if we r wot we h8 then
people who equate homosexuals to paedophiles are clearly idiots but you;re not doing that as far as i can see
0
(Original post by TK0)
while i agree that the argument isnt the best, i would say that most people have within them racist feelings and other such unwanted emotions - eg prison guards/inmates expts etc.
people who equate homosexuals to paedophiles are clearly idiots but you;re not doing that as far as i can see
while i agree that the argument isnt the best, i would say that most people have within them racist feelings and other such unwanted emotions - eg prison guards/inmates expts etc.
people who equate homosexuals to paedophiles are clearly idiots but you;re not doing that as far as i can see
0
Report
#23
(Original post by :P:P:P:P:P)
yeah I get your point. But not being 'attracted to homosexuality' dont mean you shuld be against it - i mean it dont do u any harm
yeah I get your point. But not being 'attracted to homosexuality' dont mean you shuld be against it - i mean it dont do u any harm
0
Report
#24
(Original post by :P:P:P:P:P)
yeah I get your point. But not being 'attracted to homosexuality' dont mean you shuld be against it - i mean it dont do u any harm
yeah I get your point. But not being 'attracted to homosexuality' dont mean you shuld be against it - i mean it dont do u any harm
0
(Original post by armatillian)
yeah but until we find a purpose 4 life r only aim is the same as that of every otha species - 2 further r own species. gays dont reproduce - they go against the fabric of nature - it culdnt be any simpler a **** doesnt fit inside a **** - wot otha instructions do they need. and if it is a gene then it wuld have 2 have evolved thru natural selection - and the inibility 2 have children is not a favourable characterisitc 4 survival. therefore by that argument it must be a disease - which i spose it is
yeah but until we find a purpose 4 life r only aim is the same as that of every otha species - 2 further r own species. gays dont reproduce - they go against the fabric of nature - it culdnt be any simpler a **** doesnt fit inside a **** - wot otha instructions do they need. and if it is a gene then it wuld have 2 have evolved thru natural selection - and the inibility 2 have children is not a favourable characterisitc 4 survival. therefore by that argument it must be a disease - which i spose it is
I personally think homosexuality is quite natural .. u only have to look at a lesbian porno to see it
0
Report
#26
(Original post by *SANDIE*)
Are u against lesbians then TK0? Thats wierd for a guy ... lol
Are u against lesbians then TK0? Thats wierd for a guy ... lol
0
Report
#27
(Original post by armatillian)
yeah but until we find a purpose 4 life r only aim is the same as that of every otha species - 2 further r own species. gays dont reproduce - they go against the fabric of nature - it culdnt be any simpler a **** doesnt fit inside a **** - wot otha instructions do they need. and if it is a gene then it wuld have 2 have evolved thru natural selection - and the inibility 2 have children is not a favourable characterisitc 4 survival. therefore by that argument it must be a disease - which i spose it is
yeah but until we find a purpose 4 life r only aim is the same as that of every otha species - 2 further r own species. gays dont reproduce - they go against the fabric of nature - it culdnt be any simpler a **** doesnt fit inside a **** - wot otha instructions do they need. and if it is a gene then it wuld have 2 have evolved thru natural selection - and the inibility 2 have children is not a favourable characterisitc 4 survival. therefore by that argument it must be a disease - which i spose it is
quite obviously rubbish
(and no i dont agree with that!)
0
(Original post by TK0)
its lots of blokes fantasy to have a relationship with a bisexual woman (as a real lesbian wouldnt be a whole load of use then would they!) Im not into that tho.
its lots of blokes fantasy to have a relationship with a bisexual woman (as a real lesbian wouldnt be a whole load of use then would they!) Im not into that tho.
You cant control who u fancy. If I asked u to fancy Anne Widdecombe for example, you couldnt do it. You dont choose who u fancy, and therefore you don't choose to be gay/lesbian
0
Report
#29
(Original post by *SANDIE*)
Understand the definition of 'disease' before you say offensive things like that.
I personally think homosexuality is quite natural .. u only have to look at a lesbian porno to see it
Understand the definition of 'disease' before you say offensive things like that.
I personally think homosexuality is quite natural .. u only have to look at a lesbian porno to see it
0
(Original post by armatillian)
well purely on a technical note gettin 98% on my human health and disease module at biology shuld stand me in gud stead - i was forgettin u had the initials Dr at the front o ure name.
well purely on a technical note gettin 98% on my human health and disease module at biology shuld stand me in gud stead - i was forgettin u had the initials Dr at the front o ure name.
0
Report
#31
(Original post by armatillian)
well purely on a technical note gettin 98% on my human health and disease module at biology shuld stand me in gud stead - i was forgettin u had the initials Dr at the front o ure name.
well purely on a technical note gettin 98% on my human health and disease module at biology shuld stand me in gud stead - i was forgettin u had the initials Dr at the front o ure name.
Ben
0
Report
#32
(Original post by TK0)
i dont know why you claim that, if your argument holds true homosexuals wouldnt reproduce and they would have "died out" long ago.
quite obviously rubbish
(and no i dont agree with that!)
i dont know why you claim that, if your argument holds true homosexuals wouldnt reproduce and they would have "died out" long ago.
quite obviously rubbish
(and no i dont agree with that!)
0
(Original post by armatillian)
yeah exactly - read my earlier post - i rubbished the idea that it was a gene - and then i argued it culdnt be unless it was a disease - and you agreed. so in a way thankyou
yeah exactly - read my earlier post - i rubbished the idea that it was a gene - and then i argued it culdnt be unless it was a disease - and you agreed. so in a way thankyou
You cant argue with the facts.
0
Report
#34
(Original post by *SANDIE*)
Well you are obviously not intelligent enough to understand that homosexuality isnt a 'disease'
Well you are obviously not intelligent enough to understand that homosexuality isnt a 'disease'
sandie are u gay by any chance?
+ no1 in the world has discovered the reason 4 homosexuality so i wuldnt expect 2 have the intelligence 2 do so
0
Report
#35
(Original post by *SANDIE*)
Is that cos u think lesbians (and lesbain activity of bisexual girls) are unnatural and you dont agree with what they do? Or u just dont find them attractive?
You cant control who u fancy. If I asked u to fancy Anne Widdecombe for example, you couldnt do it. You dont choose who u fancy, and therefore you don't choose to be gay/lesbian
Is that cos u think lesbians (and lesbain activity of bisexual girls) are unnatural and you dont agree with what they do? Or u just dont find them attractive?
You cant control who u fancy. If I asked u to fancy Anne Widdecombe for example, you couldnt do it. You dont choose who u fancy, and therefore you don't choose to be gay/lesbian
0
Report
#36
(Original post by armatillian)
yeah exactly - read my earlier post - i rubbished the idea that it was a gene - and then i argued it culdnt be unless it was a disease - and you agreed. so in a way thankyou
yeah exactly - read my earlier post - i rubbished the idea that it was a gene - and then i argued it culdnt be unless it was a disease - and you agreed. so in a way thankyou
Ben
0
Report
#37
(Original post by *SANDIE*)
The fact is ... in studies, 80% of homophobic men got a hard on when watching 2 men having sex, while only 33% of norlam men did.
You cant argue with the facts.
The fact is ... in studies, 80% of homophobic men got a hard on when watching 2 men having sex, while only 33% of norlam men did.
You cant argue with the facts.
0
(Original post by armatillian)
well i have straight A's that wuld disagree with u.
sandie are u gay by any chance?
+ no1 in the world has discovered the reason 4 homosexuality so i wuldnt expect 2 have the intelligence 2 do so
well i have straight A's that wuld disagree with u.
sandie are u gay by any chance?
+ no1 in the world has discovered the reason 4 homosexuality so i wuldnt expect 2 have the intelligence 2 do so
0
(Original post by armatillian)
o well if a study found that then i wave a white flag. a study u have found online claims 2 have found these results completely fairly - wot normal person wuld enter a study 2 watch gay porn naked in front o scientists - only freaks wuld do so - so its hardly gunna b a representative sample
o well if a study found that then i wave a white flag. a study u have found online claims 2 have found these results completely fairly - wot normal person wuld enter a study 2 watch gay porn naked in front o scientists - only freaks wuld do so - so its hardly gunna b a representative sample
And they werent naked lol!
0
Report
#40
(Original post by *SANDIE*)
Im not a lesbian no ... i have gay/lesbian friends though and I hate the way they are treated by homophobes who disciminate against them. This isnt implying TK0 becuase although he doesnt agree with it he seems to keep his opinions to himself. You on the other hand are a disrespectful fool who is denying the evidence from the studies. If you were so intelligent you would be more rational when dealing with the issue of homosexuality
Im not a lesbian no ... i have gay/lesbian friends though and I hate the way they are treated by homophobes who disciminate against them. This isnt implying TK0 becuase although he doesnt agree with it he seems to keep his opinions to himself. You on the other hand are a disrespectful fool who is denying the evidence from the studies. If you were so intelligent you would be more rational when dealing with the issue of homosexuality
as 4 denyin evidence read my last post - evidence is ridiculously shaky at best!!
0
X
new posts
