Turn on thread page Beta
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    lol - wot a wonderful argument - u h8 gays so u must be gay.

    so i spose in h8in racists peadaphiles n rapists that also makes me by ure arguments a racist who wants 2 have sex wiith children and rape anythin out there.

    i wonder wot we all r if we r wot we h8 then
    while i agree that the argument isnt the best, i would say that most people have within them racist feelings and other such unwanted emotions - eg prison guards/inmates expts etc.

    people who equate homosexuals to paedophiles are clearly idiots but you;re not doing that as far as i can see
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TK0)
    while i agree that the argument isnt the best, i would say that most people have within them racist feelings and other such unwanted emotions - eg prison guards/inmates expts etc.

    people who equate homosexuals to paedophiles are clearly idiots but you;re not doing that as far as i can see
    Are u against lesbians then TK0? Thats wierd for a guy ... lol
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by :P:P:P:P:P)
    yeah I get your point. But not being 'attracted to homosexuality' dont mean you shuld be against it - i mean it dont do u any harm
    yeah but until we find a purpose 4 life r only aim is the same as that of every otha species - 2 further r own species. gays dont reproduce - they go against the fabric of nature - it culdnt be any simpler a **** doesnt fit inside a **** - wot otha instructions do they need. and if it is a gene then it wuld have 2 have evolved thru natural selection - and the inibility 2 have children is not a favourable characterisitc 4 survival. therefore by that argument it must be a disease - which i spose it is
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by :P:P:P:P:P)
    yeah I get your point. But not being 'attracted to homosexuality' dont mean you shuld be against it - i mean it dont do u any harm
    it depends what you mean by that. i wouldnt ever go and tell gay people that they are wrong etc etc each to their own, people should keep that stuff 2 themeselves.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    yeah but until we find a purpose 4 life r only aim is the same as that of every otha species - 2 further r own species. gays dont reproduce - they go against the fabric of nature - it culdnt be any simpler a **** doesnt fit inside a **** - wot otha instructions do they need. and if it is a gene then it wuld have 2 have evolved thru natural selection - and the inibility 2 have children is not a favourable characterisitc 4 survival. therefore by that argument it must be a disease - which i spose it is
    Understand the definition of 'disease' before you say offensive things like that.

    I personally think homosexuality is quite natural .. u only have to look at a lesbian porno to see it
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by *SANDIE*)
    Are u against lesbians then TK0? Thats wierd for a guy ... lol
    its lots of blokes fantasy to have a relationship with a bisexual woman (as a real lesbian wouldnt be a whole load of use then would they!) Im not into that tho.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    yeah but until we find a purpose 4 life r only aim is the same as that of every otha species - 2 further r own species. gays dont reproduce - they go against the fabric of nature - it culdnt be any simpler a **** doesnt fit inside a **** - wot otha instructions do they need. and if it is a gene then it wuld have 2 have evolved thru natural selection - and the inibility 2 have children is not a favourable characterisitc 4 survival. therefore by that argument it must be a disease - which i spose it is
    i dont know why you claim that, if your argument holds true homosexuals wouldnt reproduce and they would have "died out" long ago.
    quite obviously rubbish

    (and no i dont agree with that!)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TK0)
    its lots of blokes fantasy to have a relationship with a bisexual woman (as a real lesbian wouldnt be a whole load of use then would they!) Im not into that tho.
    Is that cos u think lesbians (and lesbain activity of bisexual girls) are unnatural and you dont agree with what they do? Or u just dont find them attractive?

    You cant control who u fancy. If I asked u to fancy Anne Widdecombe for example, you couldnt do it. You dont choose who u fancy, and therefore you don't choose to be gay/lesbian
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by *SANDIE*)
    Understand the definition of 'disease' before you say offensive things like that.

    I personally think homosexuality is quite natural .. u only have to look at a lesbian porno to see it
    well purely on a technical note gettin 98% on my human health and disease module at biology shuld stand me in gud stead - i was forgettin u had the initials Dr at the front o ure name.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    well purely on a technical note gettin 98% on my human health and disease module at biology shuld stand me in gud stead - i was forgettin u had the initials Dr at the front o ure name.
    Well you are obviously not intelligent enough to understand that homosexuality isnt a 'disease'
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    well purely on a technical note gettin 98% on my human health and disease module at biology shuld stand me in gud stead - i was forgettin u had the initials Dr at the front o ure name.
    In that case, you should feel even worse for getting it wrong!

    Ben
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by TK0)
    i dont know why you claim that, if your argument holds true homosexuals wouldnt reproduce and they would have "died out" long ago.
    quite obviously rubbish

    (and no i dont agree with that!)
    yeah exactly - read my earlier post - i rubbished the idea that it was a gene - and then i argued it culdnt be unless it was a disease - and you agreed. so in a way thankyou
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    yeah exactly - read my earlier post - i rubbished the idea that it was a gene - and then i argued it culdnt be unless it was a disease - and you agreed. so in a way thankyou
    The fact is ... in studies, 80% of homophobic men got a hard on when watching 2 men having sex, while only 33% of norlam men did.

    You cant argue with the facts.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by *SANDIE*)
    Well you are obviously not intelligent enough to understand that homosexuality isnt a 'disease'
    well i have straight A's that wuld disagree with u.

    sandie are u gay by any chance?

    + no1 in the world has discovered the reason 4 homosexuality so i wuldnt expect 2 have the intelligence 2 do so
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by *SANDIE*)
    Is that cos u think lesbians (and lesbain activity of bisexual girls) are unnatural and you dont agree with what they do? Or u just dont find them attractive?

    You cant control who u fancy. If I asked u to fancy Anne Widdecombe for example, you couldnt do it. You dont choose who u fancy, and therefore you don't choose to be gay/lesbian
    well this is interesting, being straight i am attracted to women, and you cant tell (most) lesbians by sight, so from that point of view you have a point, but - that said i wouldnt want anything with a lesbian or bisexual. to me lesibians are the same as gay men except they dont look like them and are in a way less different to women than camp gay men are to men (perhaps cos im a guy) if that makes any sense. anyway yeh i do see it as unnatural and i dont agree with what they do, but i do accept that they are that way and are not just confused etc
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    yeah exactly - read my earlier post - i rubbished the idea that it was a gene - and then i argued it culdnt be unless it was a disease - and you agreed. so in a way thankyou
    You think that it can't be put down to your genes without classifying it as a disease!?! Even when it's not potentially harmful to the individual?

    Ben
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by *SANDIE*)
    The fact is ... in studies, 80% of homophobic men got a hard on when watching 2 men having sex, while only 33% of norlam men did.

    You cant argue with the facts.
    o well if a study found that then i wave a white flag. a study u have found online claims 2 have found these results completely fairly - wot normal person wuld enter a study 2 watch gay porn naked in front o scientists - only freaks wuld do so - so its hardly gunna b a representative sample
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    well i have straight A's that wuld disagree with u.

    sandie are u gay by any chance?

    + no1 in the world has discovered the reason 4 homosexuality so i wuldnt expect 2 have the intelligence 2 do so
    Im not a lesbian no ... i have gay/lesbian friends though and I hate the way they are treated by homophobes who disciminate against them. This isnt implying TK0 becuase although he doesnt agree with it he seems to keep his opinions to himself. You on the other hand are a disrespectful fool who is denying the evidence from the studies. If you were so intelligent you would be more rational when dealing with the issue of homosexuality
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by armatillian)
    o well if a study found that then i wave a white flag. a study u have found online claims 2 have found these results completely fairly - wot normal person wuld enter a study 2 watch gay porn naked in front o scientists - only freaks wuld do so - so its hardly gunna b a representative sample
    Actually. Most of the homophobic(gay) men participated to 'prove' how macho and masculine they were. Many were devastased when they found out that they were actually gay themselves. I thought that ethically, this study was a bit wrong ... but the findings they gave showed the sexuality of the homophobic men in a way not measurable by anything else other than a ring over the penis.

    And they werent naked lol!
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by *SANDIE*)
    Im not a lesbian no ... i have gay/lesbian friends though and I hate the way they are treated by homophobes who disciminate against them. This isnt implying TK0 becuase although he doesnt agree with it he seems to keep his opinions to himself. You on the other hand are a disrespectful fool who is denying the evidence from the studies. If you were so intelligent you would be more rational when dealing with the issue of homosexuality
    u classify ppl as fools if they disagree with u - o the irony!!

    as 4 denyin evidence read my last post - evidence is ridiculously shaky at best!!
 
 
 
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: February 26, 2004
Poll
Who is most responsible for your success at university
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.