This discussion is closed.
Adhsur
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#21
Report 17 years ago
#21
(Original post by ickle_katy)
so you think its fine for members to be posting pictures of naked women
You obviously didn't read my post.

"by all means this member should be banned/avatar removed etc.."
0
Ickle_kates
Badges: 0
#22
Report 17 years ago
#22
(Original post by ickle_katy)
so you think its fine for members to be posting pictures of naked women because they;ve been here a long time


he was only given a 24 hour ban because we like him

if he was new it would have bene permanant.

and btw, i was busy banning the user while edders was deleting the pictures.
It was not a naked avatar at all
0
Adhsur
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#23
Report 17 years ago
#23
(Original post by ickle_katy)
and btw, i was busy banning the user while edders was deleting the pictures.
If that is the case, then I apologise. But certainly the priority should be to remove the offensive pic first. It's odd that only when edders came on did it go - It was on quite long before then.
0
Adhsur
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#24
Report 17 years ago
#24
(Original post by Ickle_kates)
It was not a naked avatar at all
To be very honest, it was so small and messed up, you couldn't tell what it was anyway. lol.
0
DanMushMan
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#25
Report 17 years ago
#25
i suppose 24hrs is fair enough.
0
ickle_katy
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#26
Report 17 years ago
#26
(Original post by Adhsur)
If that is the case, then I apologise. But certainly the priority should be to remove the offensive pic first. It's odd that only when edders came on did it go - It was on quite long before then.
it takes a good couple of mins to delete a thread, if i deleted the thread before banning the user, which takes a lot longer


we'd never get round to banning them.

love Katy ***
0
ickle_katy
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#27
Report 17 years ago
#27
(Original post by Adhsur)
To be very honest, it was so small and messed up, you couldn't tell what it was anyway. lol.
not the time he posted the link...

love Katy ***
0
Adhsur
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#28
Report 17 years ago
#28
(Original post by ickle_katy)
it takes a good couple of mins to delete a thread, if i deleted the thread before banning the user, which takes a lot longer


we'd never get round to banning them.

love Katy ***
Fair enough
0
Adhsur
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#29
Report 17 years ago
#29
(Original post by ickle_katy)
not the time he posted the link...

love Katy ***
He did? Well I salute your efficiency on deleting it before most people saw it then And replacing it with barbie was most hilarious thank you.
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#30
Report 17 years ago
#30
OK come on people lay off Katy, she took appropriate action againt both members. At least it wasn't "one rule for one" and all that. Unlike the damned FA, dare hang Rio out to dry do you, what about that Man City player last season eh...
0
Publicenemyno.1
Badges: 0
#31
Report 17 years ago
#31
(Original post by Adhsur)
He did? Well I salute your efficiency on deleting it before most people saw it then And replacing it with barbie was most hilarious thank you.
what did this person do?
0
Juwel
Badges: 18
Rep:
?
#32
Report 17 years ago
#32
(Original post by Adhsur)
He did? Well I salute your efficiency on deleting it before most people saw it then And replacing it with barbie was most hilarious thank you.
Now you understand the pressures of being a mod...
0
Adhsur
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#33
Report 17 years ago
#33
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
Now you understand the pressures of being a mod...
Indeed. I never doubted it! Goodnight everyone!
0
Publicenemyno.1
Badges: 0
#34
Report 17 years ago
#34
(Original post by ZJuwelH)
Now you understand the pressures of being a mod...
sounds hard
0
DanMushMan
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#35
Report 17 years ago
#35
me thinks blamps may become the new maskall. Did any mod pm him and warn him he would be banned if didn't take his avatar down?
0
ickle_katy
Badges: 11
Rep:
?
#36
Report 17 years ago
#36
(Original post by DanMushMan)
me thinks blamps may become the new maskall. Did any mod pm him and warn him he would be banned if didn't take his avatar down?

we replaced it 3 times, with barbie.
0
elpaw
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#37
Report 17 years ago
#37
(Original post by Publicenemyno.1)
sounds hard
(Original post by Publicenemyno.1)
hi, i am new here: can you give us the lowdown on this forum?
(Original post by DanMushMan)
me thinks blamps may become the new maskall. Did any mod pm him and warn him he would be banned if didn't take his avatar down?
looks like he's already started
0
DanMushMan
Badges: 7
Rep:
?
#38
Report 17 years ago
#38
(Original post by ickle_katy)
we replaced it 3 times.
but how hard would it be to warn him properly?
0
Adhsur
Badges: 15
Rep:
?
#39
Report 17 years ago
#39
(Original post by DanMushMan)
but how hard would it be to warn him properly?
I agree. Well, it COULD be that he just thought it wasn;t working and didn;t think a mod was unhappy? Nevermind...seeeyaa...
0
Pikachu1
Badges: 0
#40
Report 17 years ago
#40
(Original post by Adhsur)
I agree. Well, it COULD be that he just thought it wasn;t working and didn;t think a mod was unhappy? Nevermind...seeeyaa...
sounds harsh
0
X
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Following the government's announcement, do you think you will be awarded a fair grade this year?

Yes (556)
50.32%
No (549)
49.68%

Watched Threads

View All