Go to first unread
Back
to top
A philosophical question
Watch
Announcements
This discussion is closed.
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
0
Report
#2
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
Use words with minimal multiples of meanings.
Use sentences which are simple and, of course, valid.
Keep your communication short, concise and to the point.
When speaking, make sure you actually open your mouth before a foggy mumbo jumbo tumbles out.
Think before you express your communication, thus adhering to the above points too...
...that's all I can think of for the moment.
0
Report
#3
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
0
(Original post by DamianHolt)
Hmmmn, I'm guessing homework...
Hmmmn, I'm guessing homework...
ehehe close, but still no, it's sort of an essay
0
(Original post by upwithlove)
Er... without typing out an essaysworth, I'd say um...
Use words with minimal multiples of meanings.
Use sentences which are simple and, of course, valid.
Keep your communication short, concise and to the point.
When speaking, make sure you actually open your mouth before a foggy mumbo jumbo tumbles out.
Think before you express your communication, thus adhering to the above points too...
...that's all I can think of for the moment.
Er... without typing out an essaysworth, I'd say um...
Use words with minimal multiples of meanings.
Use sentences which are simple and, of course, valid.
Keep your communication short, concise and to the point.
When speaking, make sure you actually open your mouth before a foggy mumbo jumbo tumbles out.
Think before you express your communication, thus adhering to the above points too...
...that's all I can think of for the moment.
Now for the next set of questions:
In what contexts might ambiguity impede knowledge or contribute to it?
0
Report
#6
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
0
Report
#7
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
0
Report
#8
(Original post by Tek)
To every extent?
To every extent?
It impede's knowledge because well... with ambiguity, one will not "know" what you're talking/writing about they'll be wiondering if it's this or that... another pointer for you... guess you probably already have that one though
0
Thanks for the replies guys, but how can ambiguity actually contribute to knowledge, in relation with language? That got me off...
0
Report
#11
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
Thanks, you gave me some good ideas
Now for the next set of questions:
In what contexts might ambiguity impede knowledge or contribute to it?
Thanks, you gave me some good ideas
Now for the next set of questions:
In what contexts might ambiguity impede knowledge or contribute to it?
Almost every branch of science has a story similar to this.
0
Report
#12
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
Where's Adhsur when you need her?
Where's Adhsur when you need her?
W.V Quine (American philosopher of science) actually noted that the simplest form of language is in the form of observation sentences, those being the sentences everyone can agree on objectively as statements of fact.
0
Thanks Adhsur and Queen
Now comes the difficult part! Does the balance between precision and ambiguity alter from one discipline to another?
Now comes the difficult part! Does the balance between precision and ambiguity alter from one discipline to another?
0
Report
#14
I'm not a philosopher, but I'll tell you what I think.
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
- so complicated:
you could look at avoiding simplifications and elucidating the details of things (e.g. a shape is spherical/egg-like rather than simply rounded).
as said before, avoid words with too many meaning.
avoid implying things.
don't use language that has a cultural basis, so that all cultures that are an audience understand it in the same way (e.g. football & soccer).
the first point I think is the one I could imagine writing the most about, the others pretty much lead on from it.
In what contexts might ambiguity impede knowledge or contribute to it?
The things that come to mind are simply this:
if you are too specific in your descriptions, you spend more time communicating and become less efficient (waste time). This increases the amount of knowledge you communicate.
if you are too simple, there is more ambiguity/vagueness and you impede the ability of the recipient to understand your communicated ideas.
Bias between simplicity and excessive detail depends on context. A technical biochemistry textbook might require greater emphasis on detail at the expense of efficiency. A simply overview of cell structure for primary school might do better with simplicity and efficiency at the expence of vagueness/ambiguity.
Hope that helped.
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
- so complicated:
you could look at avoiding simplifications and elucidating the details of things (e.g. a shape is spherical/egg-like rather than simply rounded).
as said before, avoid words with too many meaning.
avoid implying things.
don't use language that has a cultural basis, so that all cultures that are an audience understand it in the same way (e.g. football & soccer).
the first point I think is the one I could imagine writing the most about, the others pretty much lead on from it.
In what contexts might ambiguity impede knowledge or contribute to it?
The things that come to mind are simply this:
if you are too specific in your descriptions, you spend more time communicating and become less efficient (waste time). This increases the amount of knowledge you communicate.
if you are too simple, there is more ambiguity/vagueness and you impede the ability of the recipient to understand your communicated ideas.
Bias between simplicity and excessive detail depends on context. A technical biochemistry textbook might require greater emphasis on detail at the expense of efficiency. A simply overview of cell structure for primary school might do better with simplicity and efficiency at the expence of vagueness/ambiguity.
Hope that helped.
0
I've got to give this essay by tomorrow. It's not long, it should be about 700 words, but the problem is trying to put all of the ideas on language and its fair share of problems onto the paper (or virtual paper in my case, since im writing it up on the computer)...
Well, I won't have an easy night's sleep...
Well, I won't have an easy night's sleep...
0
Report
#17
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
I've got to give this essay by tomorrow. It's not long, it should be long 700 words, but the problem is trying to put all of the ideas on language and its fair share of problems onto the paper (or virtual paper in my case, since im writing it up on the computer)...
Well, I won't have an easy night's sleep...
I've got to give this essay by tomorrow. It's not long, it should be long 700 words, but the problem is trying to put all of the ideas on language and its fair share of problems onto the paper (or virtual paper in my case, since im writing it up on the computer)...
Well, I won't have an easy night's sleep...
0
Report
#19
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
Thanks for the replies guys, but how can ambiguity actually contribute to knowledge, in relation with language? That got me off...
Thanks for the replies guys, but how can ambiguity actually contribute to knowledge, in relation with language? That got me off...
now for my bit...
When considering ambiguity in language when used as a form of art (ie, literature, poetry etc) its important to understand that often, human sentiment is impossible to decipher. The driving force behind prose of any nature is strong emotion...and as emotions are fickle, it is a difficult task to try and put phrase to that which we aren't entirely sure of (do you follow me?!) Basically speaking, one may not know exactly what it is that one is wishing to express, and as such, the product resulting is invested with ambiguities that it might enable a reader to impregnate it with their own personal interpretation and experiences. Ambiguities will always arise, but this is a key facet in enabling a text to truly come alive - people tend to appreciate what they can identify with a lot more than a blow-by-blow, black and white account of a single being's twisted emotions.
*breathes a sigh of relief now that that is off her chest!*
that's ambiguities from a literary perspective.
Hate to hafta add more, but you might like to also consider the fact that it is IMPOSSIBLE to remove all ambiguity as personal experience contributes to perception...and as no two experiences are alike, so no two interpretations are identical.
I promise i'll stop now!!! lol
0
Report
#20
(Original post by FurbyMaX)
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
To what extent is it possible to overcome the ambiguity and vagueness in language?
Gimme some opinions
Thanks!
0
X
new posts
