How do you know it's not true? You have no context.
Assuming he's talking about applications to a college/the university as a whole, and A-level results (may be something completely different, but that's what I assumed), over 4 years, it's pretty much impossible that no-one's best subject was outside that range, given the sample size and the variation between candidates.
Finding out pretty much anything for post-grad is practically impossible. I never thought I would feel nostalgic for UCAS, but by the end of all my applications, I did.
Lol, I feel nostalgic and I've only just started!
Ok after scratching my head at RAE for the whole evening, particularly the columns for 4*,3* etc, I've picked ones from the list of those that had a large percentage in 4* and a teeny few that were lowish on 4 but high on 3 for potential departments to look at. Is that the right idea do you think?
I don't think the whole league table thing is the answer, I just needed somewhere to begin narrowing them down so I can find a few backups to apply to!
Cheers; i'll send you a confirmation email as-and-when I tackle the remainder of the event inbox (I've said that it will be done today, so it may be a long night ...)
Well Msc in Sociology at Oxford sounds downright horrid, so that's that sorted. I suppose I should have anticipated as much on contemplating an 'Msc' And there MPhil is 2years, so also out.
"all of the students accepted over the last 4-5 years got an average of 92-96% in their most relevant A level"
Would people on here read that as a) all of the students who applied each got 92-96% or b) the average over all of the students was 92-96%
Evidently b.
Were it a), the statement "Every student accepted in the last 4-5 years got an average of 92-96% in their most relevant A-level"
This would imply that at least one student got an average of 92-96% in said A-level.
Let us consider this student. Their A-level will be a mark out of 600 - e.g. 575/600, or 95.8%. Since they have a single mark, there's not really any point in taking an average - so you wouldn't discuss the average mark of this student in this A-level.
Were it a), the statement "Every student accepted in the last 4-5 years got an average of 92-96% in their most relevant A-level"
This would imply that at least one student got an average of 92-96% in said A-level.
Let us consider this student. Their A-level will be a mark out of 600 - e.g. 575/600, or 95.8%. Since they have a single mark, there's not really any point in taking an average - so you wouldn't discuss the average mark of this student in this A-level.
But yeah, question is definitely misleading.
Apply the same logic to (b). Take all of the students, with all of their (precise and unambiguous) marks, and take the average. Why does the average suddenly become a vague and nebulous "somewhere between 92% and 96%", rather than 95.8%? At least if we accept (a) we can see it as an average over individual modules or something.
Maybe it means over the years? It is a bit vague (4-5)
Yeah, that confuses me too. They could well have taken an average over all students for each year and then given the range over the years, but then why the uncertainty over whether it's been 4 or 5 years?
Well Msc in Sociology at Oxford sounds downright horrid, so that's that sorted. I suppose I should have anticipated as much on contemplating an 'Msc' And there MPhil is 2years, so also out.
horrid in what sense? Lots to do in little time or boring course?
How about the LSE?
I never looked at the rating thingy - just the course pages of those universities I considered to be 'decent' and chose courses that appealed.
Finding out pretty much anything for post-grad is practically impossible. I never thought I would feel nostalgic for UCAS, but by the end of all my applications, I did.
PGCEs use UCAS. I've got another UCAS number, apparently! And I'm now in Clearing, despite not asking to be, because of the late app.
****
Groan, groan, groan. I'm migrating 40 people's user accounts for a large database onto a new server. It's deadly, deadly boring.....
PGCEs use UCAS. I've got another UCAS number, apparently!
Show off. PGCEs aren't proper postgrad anyway
minimo
horrid in what sense? Lots to do in little time or boring course?
How about the LSE?
Boring course.
minimo
I never looked at the rating thingy - just the course pages of those universities I considered to be 'decent' and chose courses that appealed. No, I hate London (well for living purposes anyway) Don't worry there are plenty of good Unies I like, and Cambridge is the best for my course and its where I want to stay anyway.