The Student Room Logo

Oxford PPE (Philosophy, Politics and Economics) Students and Applicants

Scroll to see replies

probably not
how would they know?


Some schools sometimes put them in references.
*some*, *sometimes* - and it doesn't really apply for a2
probably not
how would they know?

Good point.
Can you get predicted A*s this time 'round? I reckon I could get one for Maths. It'd help the application grade-wise.
Reply 3963
Kneechuh
Good point.
Can you get predicted A*s this time 'round? I reckon I could get one for Maths. It'd help the application grade-wise.


When I went to the Warwick open day, I talked to the head of PPE admissions, and he said it won't make much, if any, difference. This is largely because some private school will just predict an A* if they think their students might get an A, so people will be predicted 4 A*s even if there's no chance of them getting it. Also, teachers have no idea who will or won't get an A* as they haven't had any yet, so it isn't of any value yet.

Saying that, if you can back ian A* prediction up with great As results, I'd have thought tutors would be impressed
Caerus
When I went to the Warwick open day, I talked to the head of PPE admissions, and he said it won't make much, if any, difference. This is largely because some private school will just predict an A* if they think their students might get an A, so people will be predicted 4 A*s even if there's no chance of them getting it. Also, teachers have no idea who will or won't get an A* as they haven't had any yet, so it isn't of any value yet.

Saying that, if you can back ian A* prediction up with great As results, I'd have thought tutors would be impressed

The problem is is that my school won't cash the AS grades in, and so the only grades I have achieved that Oxford will know of is my poor-ish GCSEs, which I don't think represent me as an applicant all that well :/
Chruchill
Like I said, I'm predicted an A and have actually been achieving it pretty much all year. I just think there's more chance of me not getting my predication due to examiner's discretion in History rather than say Maths or Physics.


I think this is definitely true. Last year for AS I would say my Maths grade (a B), was what I deserved and reflected the work I put in and how well the exam had actually gone. History on the other hand and especially one of the Philosophy modules just seemed really random. This time round I've got a few 100% dotted around both History and Philosophy and I really didn't think they were that much, if at all better than the philosophy paper I got a C in.
Reply 3966
Kneechuh
The problem is is that my school won't cash the AS grades in, and so the only grades I have achieved that Oxford will know of is my poor-ish GCSEs, which I don't think represent me as an applicant all that well :/


I don't really know, but I presume if you have done well in your modules you could talk to the person writing your reference and ask them to mention it.

Also, I'm not sure how much they notice GCSE's. When I was talking to the tutor for PPE at Brasenose at an Oxford access day he said to someone from a normal school who felt that his GCSE's weren't as good as they could be that it's not a deciding factor. He thought that as long as you were heavily backed by your school, were predicted good A levels and did well in the PPE pre-admission test you had just as good a chance as anyone.

So I wouldn't worry about it if I were you :smile:
Reply 3967
Caerus
I don't really know, but I presume if you have done well in your modules you could talk to the person writing your reference and ask them to mention it.

Also, I'm not sure how much they notice GCSE's. When I was talking to the tutor for PPE at Brasenose at an Oxford access day he said to someone from a normal school who felt that his GCSE's weren't as good as they could be that it's not a deciding factor. He thought that as long as you were heavily backed by your school, were predicted good A levels and did well in the PPE pre-admission test you had just as good a chance as anyone.

So I wouldn't worry about it if I were you :smile:



I think I spoke to the same tutor, the guy from Brasenose, our Oxford access day was in Cardiff.

This isn't very relevant but I just rememebered at its kinda funny.
I went to speak to this tutor afterwards, I had to wait behind this Chinese girl, she was asking him whether English not being her first language was an issue.

He was obviously trying to show her that as long as you are talented etc it doesn't matter where you are from etc. He goes, "Well its all about whether you can think analytically, for instance awnser the question... is toothpaste a medicine?"
"Urrr, sorryy, what is this... toothpaste??"
"You know toothpaste" *gisticulates toward mouth*
"Lips... what?"
"Toothpassteee! Clean mouth with!"
"I...."
"Oh never mind...."
Reply 3968
Buffyboy
I think I spoke to the same tutor, the guy from Brasenose, our Oxford access day was in Cardiff.

This isn't very relevant but I just rememebered at its kinda funny.
I went to speak to this tutor afterwards, I had to wait behind this Chinese girl, she was asking him whether English not being her first language was an issue.

He was obviously trying to show her that as long as you are talented etc it doesn't matter where you are from etc. He goes, "Well its all about whether you can think analytically, for instance awnser the question... is toothpaste a medicine?"
"Urrr, sorryy, what is this... toothpaste??"
"You know toothpaste" *gisticulates toward mouth*
"Lips... what?"
"Toothpassteee! Clean mouth with!"
"I...."
"Oh never mind...."


Ha ha, yeh that was him, I was there too in the queue to chat to him when I heard that. He seemed to be getting pretty frustrated by the person in front of me trying to argue to him that PE was a good enough A-level for PPE.

His main talk was incredible, there were about 50 questions about whether maths was necessary, and he kept saying the same thing over and over; he was not happy by the end.

He did seem a bit of a legend to be honest, when I was talking to him I mentioned I was applying to Balliol and he kept sugesting that Brasenose was just as good if not better in a jokey way. Then he laughed when I said I just couldn't face doing the same course at the same college as David Cameron, admitted it was fair enough then lost interest in me :rolleyes:
Reply 3969
probably not
nobody cares about the extra-curriculars, if you have three other a-levels it'll be fine


Safe- Thanks,

X
Reply 3970
Apart from Cambridge what other universities offer the natural science course, and which ones would you have gone to if you didnt secure your place at cambridge. Imperial, UCL, Bath, Durham. Am I right in saying that the order of overall best and lushness goes:
Cambridge
Imperial
UCL
Durham
Bath
Right?
Caerus
there were about 50 questions about whether maths was necessary, and he kept saying the same thing over and over;


Which was...?

And Brasenose is far superior to Balliol as a college
Reply 3972
Virgil
Apart from Cambridge what other universities offer the natural science course, and which ones would you have gone to if you didnt secure your place at cambridge. Imperial, UCL, Bath, Durham. Am I right in saying that the order of overall best and lushness goes:
Cambridge
Imperial
UCL
Durham
Bath
Right?


I wanted to specialise in Physics eventually, and I think that only the cambridge course is of a high enough standard to be able to do that, mostly because you pretty much fit the 1st year of three different subjects into the first year of NatSci. Also since Cambridge doesn't offer standalone science degrees, when you specialise you don't miss anything from that subject. Imperial etc offers physics on its own, so surely the Physics students do more physics than the Imperial NatScis who do Physics?

Maybe I'm wrong, but thats what I thought when I applied.
Virgil
Apart from Cambridge what other universities offer the natural science course, and which ones would you have gone to if you didnt secure your place at cambridge. Imperial, UCL, Bath, Durham. Am I right in saying that the order of overall best and lushness goes:
Cambridge
Imperial
UCL
Durham
Bath
Right?


Nottingham has a Natural Sciences course as well! Think they only brought it in recently, though...
Reply 3974
Imperial doesn't offer a Natural Sciences course as far as I'm aware. They have a "natural sciences" department but offer science degrees singularly.
Reply 3975
London Prophet
Which was...?

And Brasenose is far superior to Balliol as a college


The tutor was just saying what you've said before about whether Maths is necessary or not. He said that if you ask the economics tutors, they would say it is very useful indeed for doing the more complex options in the second and third year economics modules, but its not at all a problem unless you want to do these modules. Also, he seemed to stress that Politics tutors were equally keen that applicants have history as well as saying that some philosophy tutors may actually prefer that you hadn't done philosophy before so that they could teach it to you (although I don't know how true that is).

With regards to Balliol and Brasenose it's really not for me to say; I just dislike David Cameron and he did PPE at Brasenose.
Reply 3976
I would put UCL second, and Nottingham above Bath.
paneity
I wanted to specialise in Physics eventually, and I think that only the cambridge course is of a high enough standard to be able to do that, mostly because you pretty much fit the 1st year of three different subjects into the first year of NatSci. Also since Cambridge doesn't offer standalone science degrees, when you specialise you don't miss anything from that subject. Imperial etc offers physics on its own, so surely the Physics students do more physics than the Imperial NatScis who do Physics?

Maybe I'm wrong, but thats what I thought when I applied.
I'd assume that most people applying to do Natural Sciences at Cambridge apply for specific subjects at other universities. In all the cases (except one) where I know what people applied for, that's what happened (the exception applied everywhere for physics but also to Birmingham for something to do with physics and biology). There were fewer Natsci courses then but I'm fairly sure it would still be true now.
Supermerp
I'd assume that most people applying to do Natural Sciences at Cambridge apply for specific subjects at other universities. In all the cases (except one) where I know what people applied for, that's what happened (the exception applied everywhere for physics but also to Birmingham for something to do with physics and biology). There were fewer Natsci courses then but I'm fairly sure it would still be true now.


Yes, I applied for Biochemistry everywhere else (Bristol, Durham, St Andrews, Cardiff). So glad I got into Cambridge, I have since rather gone off the idea of pure Biochem.

phil.
I remember this thread! Nice to see a good clutch of '10 applicants (although at this point last year, I'm not sure I even knew that PPE was a degree...)

Just to say thanks - everything was spot on ahah :smile:

oh, and some messages of reassurance:

-i was an awful klutz at interview, i think many people are. no intellectual bullying, and everyone was perfectly lovely.
-i don't do history, and haven't done since i was very, very small (but am taking fpmaths...)
-a friend of mine only got 2 As at GCSE, and a handful of Bs Cs and Ds, but he still got in :smile:

x

Quick Reply