The Student Room Logo

Oxford PPE (Philosophy, Politics and Economics) Students and Applicants

Scroll to see replies

I liked cells better- generally, I found the course more interesting than materials. I felt that we didn't go into enough depth with stuff in materials compared to cells and I didn't really understand what was going on. =P However, I think the materials course is a lot better organised. It's a personal thing I guess, I am just very interested in cell biology even though I am meant to be a chemist. I did chemistry, cells, materials and maths a.

I am extremely clumsy so I wouldn't worry about that... I used to spill everything in practicals but its okay... =)
Reply 4241
Im in Year 11 and i am thinking of doing PPE at university but im not sure about my a-levels

Im thinking of doing

Chemistry
Biology
History
Philosophy

Im considering changing Economics for one of the sciences.

Is is vital that i do either maths or economics?
I really enjoy all of PPE and have read many books on the different parts.

Do i need to change my choices to give myself the best chance?
Graphix
Yes, I have Wolff's introduction on my shelf so I'm looking forward to reading that...(so much!!)

I went to a J.P. Morgan course today, met two other girls applying for PPE and we were talking about was reading!!

I might read Mill but I don't think I'll mention it on the PS as it's so common...

Mill is so important to political philosophy that if you were to bring him up in your PS, you might be asked about him in your interview, and if you seriously know your JS Mill (moreso than the standard joe who's just read 'On Liberty' in philosophy), they'd be impressed.*

*That is complete conjecture, but I've reasoned that it's gotta be roughly true :wink:

I've got a friend who used to go to my school who's going to be applying for PPE (and he's seriously going to get a place; he's awesome), but me and another friend were just accompanying him as friends when he was meeting up with old teachers, and we visited my current philosophy teacher, and we ended up having a huge and really deep conversation about Marx. My philosophy teacher wrote his PhD thesis on something to do with Marxism, and so knows it really well, and my other friend also has a profound knowledge of Marxism (although he's not a Marxist). It was just so insightful (read: strange) watching those two talk about really advanced concepts of Marxism (i.e. certain authors' interpretations of it, critiques, etc.) and me being able to chip in, having 'only' read DK, TGI & TCM. It was one of the best conversations I've had, but left me thinking that I might read a lot more on Marx, like dialectical materialism and famous critiques, and put it on my personal statement; though I can only imagine how cliche it must be for a 17/18 year old to say they have an interest in Marxism on their personal statement... :rolleyes:

We then went to the pub and played 'Are you smarter than a 10 year old' on one of those quiz machines for money, and we were 1 question away from winning £5! The question was something like: "According to the Gospel's of Mark, how long did Jesus suffer on the cross for?". We thusly guessed it wrong, and spent the rest of the day crying.
desfes
Im in Year 11 and i am thinking of doing PPE at university but im not sure about my a-levels

Im thinking of doing

Chemistry
Biology
History
Philosophy

Im considering changing Economics for one of the sciences.

Is is vital that i do either maths or economics?
I really enjoy all of PPE and have read many books on the different parts.

Do i need to change my choices to give myself the best chance?


Not sure.

Maths is definately a plus, what's your GCSE maths likely to be? If you survive with Chemistry, then the lack of maths shouldn't be too much of an issue.

Don't worry too much about the Sciences. I did Maths Bio and Politics A Levels, with Chemistry at AS and got an offer this year. I'm not sure they're bothered too much about having eco/pol/phil if you can prove you're interested in the subject.

So I'd recommend not changing unless you want to do maths. Don't worry about the sciences too much. At the end of the day, they'd much rather you do what you want to do so you get the grades they require.
Kneechuh
Mill is so important to political philosophy that if you were to bring him up in your PS, you might be asked about him in your interview, and if you seriously know your JS Mill (moreso than the standard joe who's just read 'On Liberty' in philosophy), they'd be impressed.*

*That is complete conjecture, but I've reasoned that it's gotta be roughly true :wink:

I've got a friend who used to go to my school who's going to be applying for PPE (and he's seriously going to get a place; he's awesome), but me and another friend were just accompanying him as friends when he was meeting up with old teachers, and we visited my current philosophy teacher, and we ended up having a huge and really deep conversation about Marx. My philosophy teacher wrote his PhD thesis on something to do with Marxism, and so knows it really well, and my other friend also has a profound knowledge of Marxism (although he's not a Marxist). It was just so insightful (read: strange) watching those two talk about really advanced concepts of Marxism (i.e. certain authors' interpretations of it, critiques, etc.) and me being able to chip in, having 'only' read DK, TGI & TCM. It was one of the best conversations I've had, but left me thinking that I might read a lot more on Marx, like dialectical materialism and famous critiques, and put it on my personal statement; though I can only imagine how cliche it must be for a 17/18 year old to say they have an interest in Marxism on their personal statement... :rolleyes:

We then went to the pub and played 'Are you smarter than a 10 year old' on one of those quiz machines for money, and we were 1 question away from winning £5! The question was something like: "According to the Gospel's of Mark, how long did Jesus suffer on the cross for?". We thusly guessed it wrong, and spent the rest of the day crying.

Haha - thanks for that story. Brilliant.

I don't know though...I still feel like everybody mentions J.S.Mill...I'll defnitely read some though...

About the Marxism, I guess it depends on how you put what you say...though, I'm not sure how much to believe about this whole PS importance thing...

Are you gonna have a go at some Mill then??
Graphix
Haha - thanks for that story. Brilliant.

I don't know though...I still feel like everybody mentions J.S.Mill...I'll defnitely read some though...

About the Marxism, I guess it depends on how you put what you say...though, I'm not sure how much to believe about this whole PS importance thing...

Are you gonna have a go at some Mill then??

I think so.. although for me, Mill's a boring guy, and I absolutely detest the way he writes (the guy's never heard of a paragraph). I've read On Liberty, but not in depth or analytically enough to properly talk about it, so I think I'm going to tackle that and 'Utilitarianism' over the summer.

I was thinking about, making Nietzsche my 'specialist subject' (:p: ), although he's not as deep as someone like Marx, and I don't really agree with what he says... :rolleyes:

I'd just like to point out now that Amazon Marketplace is the greatest bookshop that's ever existed. (>£1 books, and £2.75 standard postage?? Yes please!)

Edit: Actually, due to my mediocre GCSEs, I think I might also try and read a book on 'critical thinking', or something like that, as I reckon I'd have to murder the TSA to get an interview...
I was just thinking, I should really buy myself a subscription to The Economist, but I can't really afford it... :rolleyes:

Reading The Economist's website is good enough, right? (right!?!)

That also reminded me, how when I dragged a friend to a PPE talk at the York open day, we walked into the room, and there must have been at least 10 people reading the economist, as if to try and score points with the admissions tutors. Me and my friend laughed it off, but I'm still quite worried by it..
Reply 4247
Kneechuh
Mill is so important to political philosophy that if you were to bring him up in your PS, you might be asked about him in your interview, and if you seriously know your JS Mill (moreso than the standard joe who's just read 'On Liberty' in philosophy), they'd be impressed.*

*That is complete conjecture, but I've reasoned that it's gotta be roughly true :wink:

I've got a friend who used to go to my school who's going to be applying for PPE (and he's seriously going to get a place; he's awesome), but me and another friend were just accompanying him as friends when he was meeting up with old teachers, and we visited my current philosophy teacher, and we ended up having a huge and really deep conversation about Marx. My philosophy teacher wrote his PhD thesis on something to do with Marxism, and so knows it really well, and my other friend also has a profound knowledge of Marxism (although he's not a Marxist). It was just so insightful (read: strange) watching those two talk about really advanced concepts of Marxism (i.e. certain authors' interpretations of it, critiques, etc.) and me being able to chip in, having 'only' read DK, TGI & TCM. It was one of the best conversations I've had, but left me thinking that I might read a lot more on Marx, like dialectical materialism and famous critiques, and put it on my personal statement; though I can only imagine how cliche it must be for a 17/18 year old to say they have an interest in Marxism on their personal statement... :rolleyes:

We then went to the pub and played 'Are you smarter than a 10 year old' on one of those quiz machines for money, and we were 1 question away from winning £5! The question was something like: "According to the Gospel's of Mark, how long did Jesus suffer on the cross for?". We thusly guessed it wrong, and spent the rest of the day crying.


Haha my arse have you read DK!

In which work does Marx mention dialectics? TGI is on his theroy of property, I think? I've read TCM... I don't think he mentions it there... I think I just gleaned understanding from the internet...
Reply 4248
pinkpenguin
Not sure.

Maths is definitely a plus, what's your GCSE maths likely to be? If you survive with Chemistry, then the lack of maths shouldn't be too much of an issue.

Don't worry too much about the Sciences. I did Maths Bio and Politics A Levels, with Chemistry at AS and got an offer this year. I'm not sure they're bothered too much about having eco/pol/phil if you can prove you're interested in the subject.

So I'd recommend not changing unless you want to do maths. Don't worry about the sciences too much. At the end of the day, they'd much rather you do what you want to do so you get the grades they require.



I'm fairly sure i will get an A or an A* so fingers crossed . If I got a B would there be no chance of getting in?

Also just out of interest do you go to a private school or a state school?

Thanks
desfes
I'm fairly sure i will get an A or an A* so fingers crossed . If I got a B would there be no chance of getting in?

Also just out of interest do you go to a private school or a state school?

Thanks


I wouldn't say no chance. But if you got a B you may have to consider taking Maths (perhaps to AS only?) and going for an A.

I'd cross check that info though, as it's only my perception.

I hate that second question. :p: It's not a big deal, and makes not difference to your application. But since you're being nice...

I went to a catholic primary and high school (so church funded, rather than 100% state funded. They weren't fee-paying schools) and a state sixth form.
Kneechuh
I think so.. although for me, Mill's a boring guy, and I absolutely detest the way he writes (the guy's never heard of a paragraph). I've read On Liberty, but not in depth or analytically enough to properly talk about it, so I think I'm going to tackle that and 'Utilitarianism' over the summer.

I was thinking about, making Nietzsche my 'specialist subject' (:p: ), although he's not as deep as someone like Marx, and I don't really agree with what he says... :rolleyes:

I'd just like to point out now that Amazon Marketplace is the greatest bookshop that's ever existed. (>£1 books, and £2.75 standard postage?? Yes please!)

Edit: Actually, due to my mediocre GCSEs, I think I might also try and read a book on 'critical thinking', or something like that, as I reckon I'd have to murder the TSA to get an interview...

Ooh...doesn't sound too great...but I still might look into it. Let me know what you think.

Haha - but that's good though. The tutors will like that you don't agree as that will probably be different to what they usually hear. They'll be interested to know you're thoughts about it...(that is, if they read your PS...:rolleyes: )

I haven't actually browsed through the marketplace - just ordered a few books off the main site though...

Sounds like you should be visiting my TSA thread...(http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?p=20043916#post20043916)

:wink:
MancStudent098
Um because I do PPE, admittedly not at Oxford, but I've known enough Oxford PPEists in my time to confirm that maths wise it's no different to any other PPE course.


And I've done PPE, at Oxford, and chatted with admissions tutors - some of them do not consider those without maths (unless there is a very good reason).
How likely is that you would choose to specialise in only two branches of PPE - by that I mean is it usually a pre-determined decision or does it come about after you've had the experience of all three (do you learn to despise one as it were :smile:)
Buffyboy
Haha my arse have you read DK!

In which work does Marx mention dialectics? TGI is on his theroy of property, I think? I've read TCM... I don't think he mentions it there... I think I just gleaned understanding from the internet...

Why would I lie about reading stuff on an internet forum? I don't want to argue with you or turn this into anything spiteful, but the absolute foundings of Marx's work lies in his dialectical materialism, which he pretty much stole from Hegel. I don't know how you could read Marx with any solid foundations without understanding his dialectic approach to history. Without that, it's meaningless. It'd just turn into idealist utopic nonsense - exactly the sort of thing Marx was against.

Graphix
Ooh...doesn't sound too great...but I still might look into it. Let me know what you think.

Haha - but that's good though. The tutors will like that you don't agree as that will probably be different to what they usually hear. They'll be interested to know you're thoughts about it...(that is, if they read your PS...:rolleyes: )

I haven't actually browsed through the marketplace - just ordered a few books off the main site though...

Sounds like you should be visiting my TSA thread...(http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?p=20043916#post20043916)

:wink:

Beautiful! Thanks! :biggrin:
i wouldn't recommend nietzsche as it's maybe a bit too esoteric (or: lots of angsty teenagers read him and think they understand what's going on, and it looks a bit lame to tutors who know that nietzsche only comes up in one, optional, paper).

and, er, the dialectic is pretty mainstream in marx.
girlodnyu
How likely is that you would choose to specialise in only two branches of PPE - by that I mean is it usually a pre-determined decision or does it come about after you've had the experience of all three (do you learn to despise one as it were :smile:)


Most people drop one at the end of first year, but you probably won't have proper idea of what to drop until you've done each subject for a bit. Some people start out primarily interested in economics, and then when they realise economics is just applied mathematics they drop it at the first opportunity and passionately loathe the subject that made them spend £80 on textbooks for the rest of their lives.
Reply 4256
Heh, or they drop philosophy realising that the only thing stupider than trying to model the world economy as having two goods and perfect competition is spending several weeks thinking about whether the world economy in fact exists and then deciding you can't really prove it.
Reply 4257
I'm debating choosing MMS over Computer Science. I am very sure about the other three maths, physics and chemistry. I hear that MMS is boring just form glancing at other threads.

Any Opinions?
Reply 4258
It starts off boring and gets better (i've heard...), but I'm not convinced Compsci is a barrel of laughs either
the compsci brochure tells you that no prior knowledge is needed but in truth according to most Natscis i know, it certainly is,
Materials on the other hand does seem to get better throughout term.
And geology is good fun, maybe worth considering

Quick Reply