Turn on thread page Beta

BNP: "We no longer want a White Britain" watch

    Offline

    2
    (Original post by necessarily benevolent)
    Did the Commie really go running to a higher authority to get me reprimanded? Har har :teeth:
    how unfunny

    Anway back to the thread, I wouldn't say the BNP no longer want a white Britain because that's just unrealistic and it's a part of a ploy to make themselves more acceptable to the public and has already been said before not doable does not mean undesirable.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Crosseyed And Painless)
    Out of interest, when did this "experiment" occur?



    'Cause that sure looks multi-cultural to me. I guess we had a referendum then though?

    Surely if immigration is really the problem, the focus should be restricting those who are not British nationals, rather than those who are not ethnically British?
    After all, how many North Americans/Australasians (in particular) have British ethnic lineage? The negative impact of them all being repatriated by Amerindians and Aboriginals would be far greater on Britain than all us British darkies...
    All immigration should be stopped.

    Don't justify anything by what other countries could potentially do.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sleekchic)
    how unfunny
    I'm sorry but the only way to deal with these people is to mock them.
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by necessarily benevolent)
    I'm sorry but the only way to deal with these people is to mock them.
    When you don't have truth on your side, I suppose it is the only way to deal with them.
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    Fools! There would be no need for immigrants or it would be impossible for immigrants to come here as long as we just had more babies!!! Birth rate in this country is at 1.6 (according to the telegraph!) and you need it to be 2.1 for replacement to occur.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Georgecopter)
    When you don't have truth on your side, I suppose it is the only way to deal with them.
    No. When 'their' actions consist of copying and pasting previous posts, and simply using your arguments as a 'backdrop' to regurgitate and prescribe their own views, I see no benefit in trying to debate them. They clearly don't want it.

    And I'm lolling at the "my opinion is truth, I am the fountain of all knowledge" line. :awesome:
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    I saw this. When will he ever stop this false pretence.
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by necessarily benevolent)
    All immigration should be stopped.
    Did you get that from the "Big Book of Economic Suicide"?

    That's one of the most monumentally stupid things I've ever seen posted on TSR.
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by necessarily benevolent)

    And I'm lolling at the "my opinion is truth, I am the fountain of all knowledge" line. :awesome:
    But it's true!
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Andy the Anarchist)
    Did you get that from the "Big Book of Economic Suicide"?

    That's one of the most monumentally stupid things I've ever seen posted on TSR.
    Immigration is only ever a short-term fix, with a potentially cataclysmic outcome. It is simply a myth that halting immigration would destroy our economy. There are hundreds of examples of countries developing without a heavy foreign input (for one, the two main NICs). Investment in development from an early age, and intensive training for the unemployed is a far better option.
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by Hibz123)
    I saw this. When will he ever stop this false pretence.
    Griffin is looking for mainstream media interest and mainstream votes and on that basis he'll bend the facts about BNP aims as much as he can. Sooner or later I think he'll have to use some plain language and here it will get tricky for him. If he says anything which sounds like a retreat from white-nationalism his own hardcore party members will get upset, yet if he says things which make the white-nationalism all too obvious it will limit the degree of inroad he'd like to make into mainstream voting.

    I think all we have to do is keep making reference to the facts about the BNP - that they are a party centrally defined by their white-nationalist and racist aims - and wait for them to slip up with their own rhetoric, one way or another.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oswy)
    Griffin is looking for mainsteam media interest and maintream votes and on that basis he'll bend the facts about BNP aims as much as he can. Sooner or later I think he'll have to use some plain language and here it will get tricky for him. If he says anything which sounds like a retreat from white-nationalism his own hardcore party members will get upset, yet if he says things which make the white-nationalism all too obvious it will limit the degree of inroad he'd like to make into mainsteam voting.

    I think all we have to do is keep making reference to the facts about the BNP - that they are a party centrally defined by their white-nationalist and racist aims - and wait for them to slip up with their own rhetoric, one way or another.
    I agree but misleading the public, in effect has gained him more votes.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oswy)
    I totally agree, he'll say anything to get a foot in the door of power - his aims are those of a neo-Nazi, always were, always will be.
    Although I'm sick of you, I came across something which, hopefully, will shut you up once and for all (although I'm not hopeful):

    "Clearly, the BNP have nothing to do with the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP) which Adolf Hitler fronted. This tactic of associating Hitler's Germany with all nationalist parties in Europe has been in play since around 1950; constructed to keep those who oppose Communist ideology on the defensive.

    In truth, the BNP are indeed a 'National Socialist' party but just as a Liberal Party in Austria is nothing like the Liberal Party here in Britain, one is seeing apples being compared with oranges whenever someone accuses the BNP of being National Socialists in order to imply they have adopted all the same policies as Fascist Germany did during the 1930s.

    The major stand-off, building into a storm, is that between Internationalism and Nationalism.

    Communism, Marxism, the USA under Reagan, Bush Snr & Jnr, Clinton, and Obama; and Tony Blair's New Labour; are all manifestations of International Socialism. Because of the open borders nature of their sick ideology, they are supported by Corporate interests & International Banks, who naturally stand to make huge profits under such a system. This is why the Rothschild's helped sponsor the birth of Communism, and its first major success: the Bolshevik Revolution.

    The colour red provides us with useful clues. Rothschild means "Red Shield" in German, the Communist colour is blood red, and May Day is celebrated not because of "the workers,' but simply because on 1 May 1776, the Illuminati was established, so out come the red flags.

    Parties like the BNP, the Vlaams Belang in Belgium, and others around Europe have recognized the inherent danger posed by International Socialism, where one race or one group is to be played off against another by the money interests, in one giant game of arbitrage.

    Whilst the BNP are properly described as being National Socialist, the NSDAP (who the ignorant persist in calling only by the Hebrew word "Nazi" ) were not truly representative of National Socialism. Why? Because the German people had been involved in long running RACE WAR with the clannish Turkic/Hunnish immigrants to the ancient German territories who still, to this day, prefer to be known only as Jews. These are not real Jews, they are the false Jews, the "Synagogue of Satan" Jews that were predicted in the New Testament. These two opposing racial groups had been at each other's throats since the mid 19th century, and it took a World War (1914-18), an Economic Depression and the connivance of the economically powerful (former east & central European) "Jewish" communities of New York and Chicago to turn that localized race war into another world war.

    Most of Britain's journalists, school teachers, artists, and former social science students (as in elsewhere around the West) were inculcated into Communist ideology during their university years. Such conditioning is actually built in to their curricula. This vanguard of useful idiots holding passionate yet extremist opinions has helped establish the falsity that BNP = National Socialist = Nazi = War = Genocide.

    It is not difficult to establish the truth of a far more reliable reality: that Communism and Communists have murdered many, MANY more innocent people for their race or political beliefs than the German NSDAP under Hitler ever did. Astonishingly, the ratio is something like 30 to 1. To be Communist (or Marxist) is to celebrate the killing of anyone who opposes you politically. The Soviet Communists built a large network of concentration camps (the Gulag), psychiatric wards to house political dissidents, and they also invented mobile gassing vans which they then (during the late 1930s) taught Hitler's SS how to use. You can confirm all these facts for yourself.

    Truth is the great liberator for us all. For several obvious reasons, Britain's New Labour is evil incarnate. They are ultimately being controlled by an elite group who the public does not see, and knows even less about. A larger agenda is being played out and so far, only a few observers have cottoned on. That will likely change, and rapidly, during the next few years."
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    He's right, it ISN'T do-able.

    But I'm still going to be labelled as a second class citizen on the basis of my skin colour and that is still racist.
    Offline

    14
    The only thing worse than a racist is a mercurial and fickle racist.
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by necessarily benevolent)
    Although I'm sick of you, I came across something which, hopefully, will shut you up once and for all (although I'm not hopeful):

    "Clearly, the BNP have nothing to do with the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei (NSDAP) which Adolf Hitler fronted. This tactic of associating Hitler's Germany with all nationalist parties in Europe has been in play since around 1950; constructed to keep those who oppose Communist ideology on the defensive.

    In truth, the BNP are indeed a 'National Socialist' party but just as a Liberal Party in Austria is nothing like the Liberal Party here in Britain, one is seeing apples being compared with oranges whenever someone accuses the BNP of being National Socialists in order to imply they have adopted all the same policies as Fascist Germany did during the 1930s.

    The major stand-off, building into a storm, is that between Internationalism and Nationalism.

    Communism, Marxism, the USA under Reagan, Bush Snr & Jnr, Clinton, and Obama; and Tony Blair's New Labour; are all manifestations of International Socialism. Because of the open borders nature of their sick ideology, they are supported by Corporate interests & International Banks, who naturally stand to make huge profits under such a system. This is why the Rothschild's helped sponsor the birth of Communism, and its first major success: the Bolshevik Revolution.

    The colour red provides us with useful clues. Rothschild means "Red Shield" in German, the Communist colour is blood red, and May Day is celebrated not because of "the workers,' but simply because on 1 May 1776, the Illuminati was established, so out come the red flags.

    Parties like the BNP, the Vlaams Belang in Belgium, and others around Europe have recognized the inherent danger posed by International Socialism, where one race or one group is to be played off against another by the money interests, in one giant game of arbitrage.

    Whilst the BNP are properly described as being National Socialist, the NSDAP (who the ignorant persist in calling only by the Hebrew word "Nazi" ) were not truly representative of National Socialism. Why? Because the German people had been involved in long running RACE WAR with the clannish Turkic/Hunnish immigrants to the ancient German territories who still, to this day, prefer to be known only as Jews. These are not real Jews, they are the false Jews, the "Synagogue of Satan" Jews that were predicted in the New Testament. These two opposing racial groups had been at each other's throats since the mid 19th century, and it took a World War (1914-18), an Economic Depression and the connivance of the economically powerful (former east & central European) "Jewish" communities of New York and Chicago to turn that localized race war into another world war.

    Most of Britain's journalists, school teachers, artists, and former social science students (as in elsewhere around the West) were inculcated into Communist ideology during their university years
    . Such conditioning is actually built in to their curricula. This vanguard of useful idiots holding passionate yet extremist opinions has helped establish the falsity that BNP = National Socialist = Nazi = War = Genocide.

    It is not difficult to establish the truth of a far more reliable reality: that Communism and Communists have murdered many, MANY more innocent people for their race or political beliefs than the German NSDAP under Hitler ever did. Astonishingly, the ratio is something like 30 to 1. To be Communist (or Marxist) is to celebrate the killing of anyone who opposes you politically. The Soviet Communists built a large network of concentration camps (the Gulag), psychiatric wards to house political dissidents, and they also invented mobile gassing vans which they then (during the late 1930s) taught Hitler's SS how to use. You can confirm all these facts for yourself.

    Truth is the great liberator for us all. For several obvious reasons, Britain's New Labour is evil incarnate. They are ultimately being controlled by an elite group who the public does not see, and knows even less about. A larger agenda is being played out and so far, only a few observers have cottoned on. That will likely change, and rapidly, during the next few years."
    The bits in bold are historical fantasy and borderline paranoia.
    Offline

    13
    (Original post by necessarily benevolent)
    Although I'm sick ...
    As Andy has shown, your desperate cut and paste jobs only show you to lack credibility.
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by necessarily benevolent)
    Immigration is only ever a short-term fix, with a potentially cataclysmic outcome. It is simply a myth that halting immigration would destroy our economy. There are hundreds of examples of countries developing without a heavy foreign input (for one, the two main NICs). Investment in development from an early age, and intensive training for the unemployed is a far better option.
    Why do you want to stop a native white Brit selling his house to someone from another country? Why do you want to control people -- who do you think you are?
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Oswy)
    As Andy has shown, your desperate cut and paste jobs only show you to lack credibility.
    Lol. You talking about cut and paste jobs. :toofunny:
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Andy the Anarchist)
    The bits in bold are historical fantasy and borderline paranoia.
    I'd say informed conjectures, as essentially everything is.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: July 15, 2009
Poll
Who is most responsible for your success at university
Useful resources

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.