This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

Al Q'aida threats to China

Prince Rhyus

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/5826040/China-pleads-for-understanding-as-al-Qaeda-vows-revenge-over-Uighur-deaths.html

As if taking on the West and Russia wasn't enough of a battle, it seems that they want to take on the country with the biggest army in the world.

How will this one pan out?

The size of the army is not an important factor. The US has the strong armed forces in the world and it has not succeeded in completely removing the terror threat posed by Islamism and Al-Qaeda. That is terrorism for you.

Reply 21

Dirac Delta Function

14

some grotty terrorists vs a billion people who know kung fu....

Reply 22

Phonicsdude

19

Bubbles*de*Milo

Am I the only person going :confused:

at the thought of Muslim Chinese people?
Really? I mean... wtf? Since when!?

Edit: Nvm nvm nvm no one gets it nvm.

hahaha. AND JEWS! lol

I guess they dont fight over land in China cos there's so much of it. Mind you, a lot of it is desert!

£10 China > Al-Qaeda

Kolya

The size of the army is not an important factor. The US has the strong armed forces in the world and it has not succeeded in completely removing the terror threat posed by Islamism and Al-Qaeda. That is terrorism for you.

Do you not think a willingness to do as you please irrespective of international pressure (yes more so than the US), closer geographical proximity and greater manpower would be particularly useful should they decide to take action?

For the record I dont think it will happen..

Reply 25

username196545

19

Phonicsdude

hahaha. AND JEWS! lol

I guess they dont fight over land in China cos there's so much of it. Mind you, a lot of it is desert!

I

Chinese Jews.

It's like being f***** over from all sides.

Reply 26

Kolya

17

Phonicsdude

Do you not think a willingness to do as you please irrespective of international pressure (yes more so than the US), closer geographical proximity and greater manpower would be particularly useful should they decide to take action?

Algeria isn't all that much easier for China to access than Afghanistan was for the US.

Reply 27

danadd9

12

China are being the reluctant fighters in a Martial arts movie, who then completely stomp the opposition.
:fight:

Woo go China!

Reply 28

Phonicsdude

19

Kolya

Algeria isn't all that much easier for China to access than Afghanistan was for the US.

Ah, OK. I dont believe China would touch Algeria. Not least cos they'd have to come through me first.

I was thinking a little closer to home e.g. Afghanistan or whichever rogue ex-commie state they choose as their new cave hangout.

Reply 29

Snookercraze

12

Diamond Diva

Muslims who lack the capacity to condemn a vile terrorist organisation disgusts me.

Who's doing that?

Reply 30

Meagz

12

China are just gonna Zerg rush them.

Reply 31

Mr_Steve_Stifler

I actually laughed out loud at this lol. Al Qaeda Vs the US/UK, China and Russia.

Hmm, fancy putting a bet on?

Reply 32

Aeolus

2

Mr_Steve_Stifler

I actually laughed out loud at this lol. Al Qaeda Vs the US/UK, China and Russia.

Hmm, fancy putting a bet on?

No i lost money betting against Al Qaeda last time.

Reply 33

gyyy2807

14

Sundous

What morons, why attack innocent people in other countries for "revenge" just because they're han-chinese

in fact, why attack people at all

Al-Qaida disgusts me

i completely agree. i've never understood al-qiada.

Reply 34

Aeolus

2

gyyy2807

i completely agree. i've never understood al-qiada.

This might help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6pGqYRi-PU&feature=related

Reply 35

vin

15

Andy the Anarchist

Does this remind anyone else of Command and Conquer Generals?

its too conveniant to be a coincidence

Reply 36

Kolya

17

Aeolus

This might help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6pGqYRi-PU&feature=related

Chomsky is not on firm ground. There is no evidence that special forces trained Afghan Arabs, nor is there much evidence that they organized, funded or armed the Afghan Arabs either. It's entirely possible that he has a source I have missed, but I suspect that he is simply exaggerating the case to make a political point.

Reply 37

Aeolus

2

Kolya

Chomsky is not on firm ground. There is no evidence that special forces trained Afghan Arabs, nor is there much evidence that they organized, funded or armed the Afghan Arabs either. It's entirely possible that he has a source I have missed, but I suspect that he is simply exaggerating the case to make a political point.