Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    3
    (Original post by Diaz89)
    :yep: but that would be pointless.
    You are an arse. Grow up and get over yourself
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Mad Vlad)
    So you would go our of your way to deny gay people the rights and lifestyle they deserve/want, then.
    no I will never harm someone so I don't know what you mean by going out of my way. But if there was a nation wide vote on gay related policies then that's a different matter (I'm not referring to the legality or illegality of homosexuality, more on marriage etc)
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Turdburger)
    You are an arse. Grow up and get over yourself
    I will still keep my opinion and thus refuse your proposition.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    well im half and half, some call it greed, I call it being open to any possibility and experience.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    being homosexual is totally fine by me, but i still use "gay" as slang. it's supposedly a homophobic thing to do. soz gayz
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    god damn sodomites.
    Offline

    3
    (Original post by Diaz89)
    I will still keep my opinion and thus refuse your proposition.
    I shouldnt have lost my temper. Your opinion, is however, completely bigoted and ridiculous.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Diaz89)
    no I will never harm someone so I don't know what you mean by going out of my way.
    http://www.answers.com/go%20out%20of%20one%27s%20way

    But if there was a nation wide vote on gay related policies then that's a different matter (I'm not referring to the legality or illegality of homosexuality, more on marriage etc)
    What are you referring to, then?
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BJack)
    http://www.answers.com/go%20out%20of%20one%27s%20way



    What are you referring to, then?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Califor...sition_8_(2008)
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Diaz89)
    no i would do it legally and democratically.
    Why? Does it bother you that much what people do in their own bedrooms?
    Offline

    3
    So I see you are with the old people, the religious right, and poorly educated people.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ForeverIsMyName)
    Why? Does it bother you that much what people do in their own bedrooms?
    that same argument can be applied to incest (not equating the two)
    Offline

    3
    (Original post by Diaz89)
    that same argument can be applied to incest (not equating the two)
    No it cant. Laws are there to protect the weak/vulnerable. Incest laws are there to protect the potential offspring. Homosexuality damages no-one.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Turdburger)
    So I see you are with the old people, the religious right, and poorly educated people.
    not really, California is the most liberal state in America.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    You said you weren't referring to marriage.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Turdburger)
    No it cant. Laws are there to protect the weak/vulnerable. Incest laws are there to protect the potential offspring. Homosexuality damages no-one.
    so if two consenting siblings decided to have sex on the condition that they wear a condom or one goes on the pill it should be legal?
    Offline

    3
    (Original post by Diaz89)
    not really, California is the most liberal state in America.
    Well that may be but those people, according to your link those people are the reason that bill was passed.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BJack)
    You said you weren't referring to marriage.
    no I was referring punishing people with prison because they're gay (legality/illegality) it would be pointless
    Offline

    3
    (Original post by Diaz89)
    so if two consenting siblings decided to have sex on the condition that they wear a condom or one goes on the pill it should be legal?
    If you could guarantee that it wouldnt produce offspring, yes. However, you cant and they law would be unworkable so I think the easiest thing to do is a blanket ban. In your view why should homosexuality be illegal?
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Diaz89)
    so if two consenting siblings decided to have sex on the condition that they wear a condom or one goes on the pill it should be legal?
    The pill and condoms are not infallible.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Brussels sprouts
    Useful resources
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.