Turn on thread page Beta

misrepresentation - three statements=three remedies?? watch

    • Thread Starter

    I am doing the last part of a question - the remedy part - and am unsure how to go around doing it. two of the three statements made by the representor are false whilst the third is an opinion but were no reasonable grounds to base it on (also could be a half-truth due to silence thus a misrepresentation). Can the representee claim three damages? All the examples i've looked at are where there is only one misrepresentation.

    Totally confused, please help!

    Yes. Each misrepresentation is seperately actionable, with the quantum of damages being the situation if the misrepresentation were true.

    You get full damages for each, unless there is double recovery. Double recovery means you can't claim twice for the same fact. So, for example, if you had two misrepresentations: one which said "the car is under 5 years old", and one which said "the car is 3 years old", and the car was actually 10 years old, then you couldn't claim for both because that would be double recovery.

    The result you are aiming for is the situation if the goods were as described
Cats or dogs?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.