Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Chat >< Chat

# The Soc for People of 'GRDCT2008' Mk VI watch

Announcements
1. I'm cold and non-dry & its made me illl.
2. (Original post by GHOSH-5)
I have another question for you

There are 4 graphs

a) b) c) d)

Write down the letters corresponding to the three curves which cut the y-axis.
3. (Original post by natty_d)
I have another question for you

There are 4 graphs

a) b) c) d)

Write down the letters corresponding to the three curves which cut the y-axis.
Do you not even have an idea?

Let y = f(x). A curve cuts the y-axis at x = 0. So a graph cuts the y-axis if f(0) is a real number. Test f(0) for each of your curves.
4. (Original post by GHOSH-5)
Do you not even have an idea?

Let y = f(x). A curve cuts the y-axis at x = 0. So a graph cuts the y-axis if f(0) is a real number. Test f(0) for each of your curves.
I see it now.
5. ....
might try and catch up with core3 tomorrow
6. Chemistry > Maths
7. but I like maths....!!
(I like chemistry too)
not spectroscopy though...
8. (Original post by raceforthefishman)
but I like maths....!!
(I like chemistry too)

not spectroscopy though...
Physical Chem

and the like.

Spectroscopy is awesssssssssssssssomeeeeeeeeee
9. Schrodinger

Maxwell-Boltzmann

10. I really really ought to get some work done before I go back...
11. (Original post by GHOSH-5)
Schrodinger

I thought that might get you exited .

I had a good one the other day considering allowed wavefunctions in 7 membered non-benzenoid aromatic rings considering a 'particle in a ring' approximation.
12. (Original post by John Locke)
I thought that might get you exited .

I had a good one the other day considering allowed wavefunctions in 7 membered non-benzenoid aromatic rings considering a 'particle in a ring' approximation.

Sounds awesome. I glanced at the sentence and was hoping on re-read for the neekiest pun ever, but it wasn't there (from what I saw)
13. physical.....oh dear...hell no!

Biochemistry
(orga is where its at baby!)
14. OK, although this last one is physics, it's too awesome, and is one of the only linear systems involving three-body problems, so is of some interest to budding physicists.

Taking the force of attraction between two objects of masses and a distance apart to be , we can place three identical particles of equal mass at the corners of an equilateral triangle in space of side length such that each particle revolves around the centre of mass of the system with an angular velocity of
Neeky Physics Banter
Why don't physicists like threesomes? Because they can't solve the three-body problem
15. (Original post by GHOSH-5)

Sounds awesome. I glanced at the sentence and was hoping on re-read for the neekiest pun ever, but it wasn't there (from what I saw)
The only thing i was going to ask is if that was too much context .

From what i gather you mathmos reel in abstraction and would much rather have the differential equation and related boundary conditions than the inconvenience of physical relevance .
16. (Original post by raceforthefishman)
physical.....oh dear...hell no!

Biochemistry
(orga is where its at baby!)
awwwwww yeah. I'm so rubbish at physical, much better and organic & biological chem (biochem, chemical bio and molecular biology ).
17. biology
18. (Original post by John Locke)
The only thing i was going to ask is if that was too much context .

From what i gather you mathmos reel in abstraction and would much rather have the differential equation and related boundary conditions than the inconvenience of physical relevance .

Oh but of course, if something looks interesting, it is studied, regardless of it's relevance to the real world. Mathematicians churn out theories and equations, some of which are made use of by our practicial minions, made up of physicists, chemists, economists and what not.
19. (Original post by GHOSH-5)

Oh but of course, if something looks interesting, it is studied, regardless of it's relevance to the real world. Mathematicians churn out theories and equations, some of which are made use of by our practicial minions, made up of physicists, chemists, economists and what not.
Touché .

But if we're talking purity, philosophy has you licked .
20. (Original post by John Locke)
Touché .

But if we're talking purity, philosophy has you licked .
I disagree, I think Maths is more pure than Philosophy

Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: April 8, 2010
Today on TSR

### Top unis in Clearing

Tons of places at all these high-ranking unis

Poll
Useful resources

### Ask the Community Team

Got a question about the site content or our moderation? Ask here.

### Welcome Lounge

We're a friendly bunch. Post here if you're new to TSR.

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE