Turn on thread page Beta
 You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Standard Problem (that I can't do) watch

1. Let f(x) be a differentiable function from and to the reals. Given that f'(x) > 0 for all x, prove that f(x) is (strictly) increasing.

I can only get the function to be increasing locally around every point.
2. Post your proof so far?
3. Seeing as (unless I've got the poster completely wrong) this is something you did ages ago, as opposed to something you're currently studying (and so we might as well cut to the chase):

Spoiler:
Show
Use the Mean Value Theorem.
4. It's gonna be annoying to write the symbols, but if f'(x) > 0 for all x then we can find a d > 0 such that for all h in (-d,d) we have -f'(x) < (f(x+h)-f(x))/h - f'(x) < f'(x). In particular, for all h in (0,d) we have f(x+h)>f(x).

So we have the statement "For all x there is a d such that for all h in (0,d) we have f(x+h)>f(x)."
5. Thanks DFranklin. This has just come up in some stuff on interest rates in my actuarial work.
6. (Original post by DFranklin)
Seeing as (unless I've got the poster completely wrong) this is something you did ages ago
Yeah, I was wondering about that...
7. (Original post by generalebriety)
Yeah, I was wondering about that...
Sad reflection on how long people remember stuff after they learn it.

(Of course, it's 20 years since I did it, and I still remember it. Principles of Dynamics, on the other hand, I remember absolutely nothing about, which is a pity, as it would be useful knowledge for me these days).

[Going back to the question: it's trivial if you know which theorem to use, and pretty much impossible if you don't, which is why I figured there was no easy way of leading the poster through it].
8. I'm trying to keep up with this stuff, but you lose a lot of the sharpness. It's a bit annoying to think I was probably at my best in this sense when I was doing STEP. I think that if I looked through the definitions and statements of theorems for an undergraduate course I would feel confident at proving everything in them. But I would be useless at tripos questions now.

I don't know how you manage to remember these sorts of things after 20 years.
9. (Original post by Drederick Tatum)
I don't know how you manage to remember these sorts of things after 20 years.
Partly it's that I knew Analysis really well, and partly it's that I kept using those results all the way up through Part III (and beyond - I got a job at DAMTP after part III and supervised analysis for a bit at the same time).

I know what you mean about the sharpness though.

Turn on thread page Beta

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: July 20, 2009
Today on TSR

### Unofficial Markscheme list 2018

Find all the answers here

### 2,751

students online now

Exam discussions

Poll
Useful resources

## Make your revision easier

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

## Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE