Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Anyone who commits crime should be forced to wear flares and tank tops. Sew them onto their skin or something. Then crime wouldn't be so cool, would it!
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Undulipodium)
    If you're going to have a dictatorship, you'll need something to hate. Genocide is pretty expensive. How do I apply for the role of Emmanuel Goldstein? :awesome:
    Yes. We must target the lazy, the unco-operative, the stupid and the sh*tmarks on society

    Genocide would be hypocritical - we want to make all races fear the dictator, not just the whites thinking they can get away with crimes, or the immigrants and indigenous population thinking they have the blanket of political correctness
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    The ideas sound good to me, our parliament is very weak and gets pushed over so easily. We need something drastic soon, or **** will hit the fan.

    @Meagz, your sig scared me.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 4G_dollars)
    I thought we were in a dictatorship. Your is just common sense.
    No. we have a confused democracy whos only interest is too solve internal bickering and pathetic scandals

    The unwaivering stupidity emitting is frightening - "Ministers in porn scandal" "Spending Scandal"

    that, and the horrible indecisiveness of our government - they are slow to take action, too timid and not bold enough to take this country by the reins and bring it back to control
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Political religious nonsense.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Dictatorships have worked so well in other areas of the world, why not have one here? :rolleyes:
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Don_Scott)
    Political religious nonsense.
    I believe all religion should be separated or abolished from the state - they should no longer be allowed to meddle in state affairs, with ridiculous claims of "Gods Will"; we should no longer be subject to the ridiculous ideas of Yahweh, God or Zeus - an Atheist state would benefit us much better
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    OP, are you being serious?

    (Original post by DVDA)
    We are far too weak as a country, and political correctness, forced tolerance etc have gone too far.
    Oh really? PCness has gone too far? I suppose you're going to come out with stuff about Baa Baa Black Sheep being banned and Christmas not being called Christmas etc, which is completely rubbish. "Winterval" was an advertising campaign and Christmas decorations/easter eggs etc are everywhere, baa baa black sheep has not been changed to "rainbow sheep" nor is it illegal.
    We are a weak country? Come on, OP, we're far from that.

    (Original post by DVDA)
    First, is the issue of crime - we should bring back ironic punishments - e.g. forcing shoplifters to pay a 10000% fine of the value in good they have stolen.
    10000% fine? No one will be able to pay that off, and what do you suggest we do to someone who can't afford that? What if a curious child who knows no better steals a 15p Freddo? Should we make them pay 150000p/£1500?

    (Original post by DVDA)
    Alcohol should be raised up to 21, Weed should be legalised and taxed rigoursly, as with Tobbaco and alcohol;
    Paedophilia, Beastality and other forms of lewd sexual practises should be discouraged through rigourous propaganda and mind therapy, to prevent any disgusting acts happening to the innocent.
    I partially agree with these, but not "heavily taxed", just taxed. If you're going to make something very expensive, the illegal trade will just go on. I agree that peadohiles etc should be able to get some kind of counselling.

    (Original post by DVDA)
    Second is Religion - They should all be demolished to make way for a state religion, to keep the masses under control and to get rid of the shackles of backward practises, idiocity and unscientific assumptions - human society must progress and leave "traditions" in the past where they should have stayed 1000 years ago.
    You're not seriously suggesting that forcing everyone to follow a set of ideologies is progression?

    (Original post by DVDA)
    Thirdly, is the issue of immigration - instead of punishing the often or not hard-working immigrants, we should be forcing everyone on benefits to be working in labour camps for food and housing - for too long we are bowing down to the demands of the lazy, who scapegoat the hardworking; this must stop - however, immigrants are also subject to this if they suffer from laziness and stupidity.
    You do realize that by law, asylum seekers can't work? Suffering from "stupidity"- that sounds like you're talking about people with disabilities. Do you suggest they have to work in labour camps? People shouldn't have to WORK for the necessities of life.

    (Original post by DVDA)
    Fourthly, the Police should be given much more power - they should have the ability to wield lethal weapons, much more CCTV, a much larger force, no paperwork and the army will be integrated into a state protection unit.
    You want the police to kill more, basically? Yes, that totally won't cause fear amongst the public and power hungry police officers abusing their power (look up the Stanford Prison Experiment- it's one example of humans abusing power). What you're suggesting is basically that innocent citizens are preyed and spied on...

    Lastly, anyone convicted of a crime no longer has their rights as humans - anyone who trespasses on another mans property is subject to the property owner.[/QUOTE]

    *gives up* OP, go out and talk to people, please.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DVDA)
    No. we have a confused democracy whos only interest is too solve internal bickering and pathetic scandals

    The unwaivering stupidity emitting is frightening - "Ministers in porn scandal" "Spending Scandal"

    that, and the horrible indecisiveness of our government - they are slow to take action, too timid and not bold enough to take this country by the reins and bring it back to control
    I know what you mean, it is dictatorship sometimes. I thought we had free speech which we clearly don't. Little jokes are now blown out of proportion.
    This nanny state is annoying....
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Cj-Tj)
    Dictatorships have worked so well in other areas of the world, why not have one here? :rolleyes:
    No. They were motivated for territorial expansion, financial gain, Jingoism and Racial incentive.

    This is a state of non-intervention, unless provoked; neutrality will remain an all-round stance.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DVDA)
    Yes.

    we need to strip them of their rights - we need to make crime feared, so people will know the consequences of their actions; no longer this namby pamby idea that they will get away with their crimes if they counter-sue for "misconduct" or "unreasonable force"

    we want to bring back consequences, and make those who think crime is "cool" to think again
    now for example, if you cut off a hand of a thief, will the number of stealers?

    A-increase
    B-decrease
    C-stay the same
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Dictatorship doesn't work. Trust me on that one.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ThisisZAK)
    now for example, if you cut off a hand of a thief, will the number of stealers?

    A-increase
    B-decrease
    C-stay the same
    That is barbaric punishment found in the ragtag fairytale of the bible.

    They shall be forced to do back-breaking labour; with shoplifters, they will be forced to pay 10000% on the original value of the stolen goods, with their community being forced to raise the money if they cannot - therefore, the community will turn against them, they will become isolated and realise that crime is a primitive thing that humans need to outgrow.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DVDA)
    No. They were motivated for territorial expansion, financial gain, Jingoism and Racial incentive.

    This is a state of non-intervention, unless provoked; neutrality will remain an all-round stance.

    You seem to have missed a very important and universal piece of human nature; power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Arturo Bandini)
    Anyone who commits crime should be forced to wear flares and tank tops. Sew them onto their skin or something. Then crime wouldn't be so cool, would it!
    We have a winner.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Unbiased Opinion)
    OP, are you being serious?



    Oh really? PCness has gone too far? I suppose you're going to come out with stuff about Baa Baa Black Sheep being banned and Christmas not being called Christmas etc, which is completely rubbish. "Winterval" was an advertising campaign and Christmas decorations/easter eggs etc are everywhere, baa baa black sheep has not been changed to "rainbow sheep" nor is it illegal.
    We are a weak country? Come on, OP, we're far from that.



    10000% fine? No one will be able to pay that off, and what do you suggest we do to someone who can't afford that? What if a curious child who knows no better steals a 15p Freddo? Should we make them pay 150000p/£1500?



    I partially agree with these, but not "heavily taxed", just taxed. If you're going to make something very expensive, the illegal trade will just go on. I agree that peadohiles etc should be able to get some kind of counselling.



    You're not seriously suggesting that forcing everyone to follow a set of ideologies is progression?



    You do realize that by law, asylum seekers can't work? Suffering from "stupidity"- that sounds like you're talking about people with disabilities. Do you suggest they have to work in labour camps? People shouldn't have to WORK for the necessities of life.



    You want the police to kill more, basically? Yes, that totally won't cause fear amongst the public and power hungry police officers abusing their power (look up the Stanford Prison Experiment- it's one example of humans abusing power). What you're suggesting is basically that innocent citizens are preyed and spied on...

    Lastly, anyone convicted of a crime no longer has their rights as humans - anyone who trespasses on another mans property is subject to the property owner.
    *gives up* OP, go out and talk to people, please.[/QUOTE]

    We are far too weak. we reinforce the idea that people are free to do as they like without consequences, and that is just sickening - they need to be brought under-control and stop bending over backward for the lazy and inconsiderate.

    Your maths is flawed. This is 10000% in addition to the original price - 15p with 100% added would be 30p, and that times that total of 30p 10 times for 1000% is £3, and that times 10 for 10000% on the original value would be £30

    it is nowhere near too harsh

    and yes, very heavily taxed - we want to make money, not lose an oppurtunity to accumulate wealth for more worthier spending, rather than enforcement of prohibition

    You misunderstand. We force a certain set of idealogy that should be reinforced in terms of human morality anyway - e.g. paedophilia is bad. we just want to have it stuck in their heads that they have to follow society, they arent allowed to go off at a tangent at other peoples expense.

    Yes. the law needs to be changed immediatly - they cant even make a left-wing democracy correctly. foolish labour. People shouldnt have to work?! they bloody well should, they are holding back the rest of the honest civilians who are forced to foot the bill for these imbeciles. and yes stupidity is a disease - they choose not to work in life, they fall behind and they fail - that sounds pretty irrational to me.

    No. they are not trained to kill, but rather to gravely injure to prevent any more crime being commited - death is too good for criminals. in addition the fact that this isnt a ragtag force of mixed veiws - they will be loyal to a certain idealogy, much like the SA, but without the genocide and targets of particular groups - all groups are equal in the eyes of the law, including gender.

    Well if their innocent then they dont have anything to worry about then do they.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Cj-Tj)
    You seem to have missed a very important and universal piece of human nature; power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.
    Yes. that is very correct.

    But, we have idealogy where there is no motivation for corruption; we remain neutral, we treat everyone as equals in retrospect to the law the dictator will have to be passed through rigourous testings physcologically to make sure he is correct for the job.

    You seem to be mistaking us for National Socialists, or god forbid the BNP

    and who says it has to be a human in charge?
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    Sounds fantastic.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DVDA)
    Yes. that is very correct.

    But, we have idealogy where there is no motivation for corruption; we remain neutral, we treat everyone as equals in retrospect to the law the dictator will have to be passed through rigourous testings physcologically to make sure he is correct for the job.

    You seem to be mistaking us for National Socialists, or god forbid the BNP
    There is always motivation for corruption, everyone wants more, its human nature again. You cant stop it, change it, or find someone without it. If there is a way of getting £500 more without having to do anything and nobody to stop you of course you would take the money.

    What else apart from a human can be in charge? Monkey? Robot? Haha, please. Dont talk ****.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DVDA)
    That is barbaric punishment found in the ragtag fairytale of the bible.

    They shall be forced to do back-breaking labour; with shoplifters, they will be forced to pay 10000% on the original value of the stolen goods, with their community being forced to raise the money if they cannot - therefore, the community will turn against them, they will become isolated and realise that crime is a primitive thing that humans need to outgrow.
    My idea is pehaps barbaric (in your view), but will your logic stop people from stealing? I hardly can imagine that! plus it's totally far from reality.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What's your favourite Christmas sweets?
    Useful resources

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.