Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Hello,

    How do I prove that x^2 is continuous at x=1 by using the epsilon-delta method?

    Working so far is:
    |x^2-1| = x+1|x-1|
    (since we'll be close to x=1 so x+1 > 0)
    and I don't know where to go from there.

    If someone could give me a proof I'd appreciate it. I have no examples so seeing one would help. Thanks.
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (1+h)^2 - 1 = 2h + h^2.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Usar)
    Hello,

    How do I prove that x^2 is continuous at x=1 by using the epsilon-delta method?

    Working so far is:
    |x^2-1| = x+1|x-1|
    (since we'll be close to x=1 so x+1 > 0)
    and I don't know where to go from there.

    If someone could give me a proof I'd appreciate it. I have no examples so seeing one would help. Thanks.
    I think you forgot the brackets around the x+1. Should be |x^2-1| = |x+1||x-1| Now you need to find a delta such that |x-1| < delta implies |x^2-1|< epsilon
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Ok, is this right: delta = min{epsilon/3, 1}?

    Working is:
    |(x+1)(x-1)| &lt; K|x-1| for some K.

    To get K:
    Assume |x-1| &lt; 1, then 1 &lt; x+1 &lt; 3, so K = 3.

    Therefore |x-1| &lt; epsilon/3.
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Value for delta is right, but what you've got isn't really a proof that x^2 is cts. You've never even said what relevant "epsilon" has to what you're doing.

    Ideally, a proof should start something like: "Take \epsilon &gt; 0. Pick \delta = \min(\epsilon /3 , 1). Then ..." and conclude "... and so |x^2 - 1| &lt; \epsilon".
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Thanks. I shouldn't have said proof, just the method of getting a value for delta.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    OK another question:
    if f(x) = x^2 for x \in [0,2] and f(x) = 0 for x \in (2,\infty), how can I prove that it's discontinuous at x=2 using the epsilon-delta definition and proof by contradiction? I can't write |f(x) - f(2)| and substitute something in for f(x) cause f(x) is different either side of x=2.

    Am I right in saying that I consider two cases: when x>2 and when x < 2 and find that they somehow lead to contradictions? (I've done this but am not sure if this is a valid method).
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    You only need to consider 1 case.


    Big Spoiler
    For any \delta &gt; 0, what is a lower bound for |f(2) - f(2+\delta / 2)|?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Oh so it leads to epsilon > (say) 3. I'm not sure how to spot "tricks" like that -- hope it comes with more familiarity. Thanks for the help.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    Btw, why did you use delta/2 in that expression (as opposed to delta)?
    Online

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Just in case you got confused because the normal formulation involves considering |f(x)-f(2)| for |x-2| &lt; \delta, and |2+\delta - 2| isn't actually less than delta.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: July 26, 2009
Poll
Cats or dogs?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.