Go to first unread
Back
to top
The UK is an horrible place
Watch
Announcements
This discussion is closed.
Report
#21
(Original post by Seven_Three)
I don't quite understand what you're saying, explain it to me.
I don't quite understand what you're saying, explain it to me.
[/facepalm]
0
Report
#23
(Original post by EskimoJo)
What?
What?
"a h..." is probably more common, but grammatically incorrect.
So basically you failed so badly its unbelievable.
0
Report
#25
(Original post by joshphillips999)
He specifically mentioned that it applied to only first world countries, and south american/african/asian countries are therefore not included.
He specifically mentioned that it applied to only first world countries, and south american/african/asian countries are therefore not included.
0
Report
#26
(Original post by Samj91)
It was sarcasm.
[/facepalm]
It was sarcasm.
[/facepalm]
0
Report
#27
(Original post by jakemittle)
I've never heard that term before?...explain?
I've never heard that term before?...explain?
0
Report
#28
(Original post by 35mm_)
Pussy boys... Does this mean homosexual boys? Homophobe? Or just an idiot?
Pussy boys... Does this mean homosexual boys? Homophobe? Or just an idiot?
0
Report
#29
Why not refer to nasty gangs as an "underclass"?
They behave like it and are poor, there's no reason they shouldn't be branded as such. No wonder there's so much class hate sometimes, because chav tw*ts have no self-respect, and it shows in the way they act and dress.
They behave like it and are poor, there's no reason they shouldn't be branded as such. No wonder there's so much class hate sometimes, because chav tw*ts have no self-respect, and it shows in the way they act and dress.
0
Report
#30
(Original post by Seven_Three)
Why are you calling me an idiot? I haven't offened you. I think it is obvious what I ment, if I wanted to say 'homosexuals' I would have said 'homosexuals'.
Why are you calling me an idiot? I haven't offened you. I think it is obvious what I ment, if I wanted to say 'homosexuals' I would have said 'homosexuals'.
0
Report
#31
(Original post by Seven_Three)
I know it was sarcasm. I don't understand why it is, in your opinion, a negative.
I know it was sarcasm. I don't understand why it is, in your opinion, a negative.
0
Report
#32
(Original post by hey guysch im kl)
the correct version is "an horrible" as is "an historical" etc.
"a h..." is probably more common, but grammatically incorrect.
So basically you failed so badly its unbelievable.
the correct version is "an horrible" as is "an historical" etc.
"a h..." is probably more common, but grammatically incorrect.
So basically you failed so badly its unbelievable.
would you say "an house"?
0
Report
#33
(Original post by burninginme)
There are very few first world, supossedly civilized countries which have quite the same problem with feral youth randomly attacking people they don't like the look of for superficial reasons than the UK. I'm male, fairly skinny and generally wear tight jeans. In many British towns, the fact you are wearing tight jeans as a male is enough provocation for chavs to shout at/try to intimidat you, and occasionally beat you up if there's enough of them (cowards alone, pack mentality).
However, I lived in Spain for a year and found significantly less issue with the underclass feeling the need to attack/cause touble with anyone they feel is different from them. Occasionally, you got youths of the underclass in Spain who would stare at you condecendingly with that cocky smirk, but that is as far as it went.
However, for someone to actually get physically attacked over nothing more than dress was as far as I was aware quite unheard of, and certainly by no means a common occurance.
However, the sad fact in the UK is that it is quite heard of, and quite possible for someone to get beaten up over superficial things.
There are very few first world, supossedly civilized countries which have quite the same problem with feral youth randomly attacking people they don't like the look of for superficial reasons than the UK. I'm male, fairly skinny and generally wear tight jeans. In many British towns, the fact you are wearing tight jeans as a male is enough provocation for chavs to shout at/try to intimidat you, and occasionally beat you up if there's enough of them (cowards alone, pack mentality).
However, I lived in Spain for a year and found significantly less issue with the underclass feeling the need to attack/cause touble with anyone they feel is different from them. Occasionally, you got youths of the underclass in Spain who would stare at you condecendingly with that cocky smirk, but that is as far as it went.
However, for someone to actually get physically attacked over nothing more than dress was as far as I was aware quite unheard of, and certainly by no means a common occurance.
However, the sad fact in the UK is that it is quite heard of, and quite possible for someone to get beaten up over superficial things.
its because its too ******* hot in Spain to bother.
0
Report
#37
(Original post by 35mm_)
You think we should beat up all "pussy boys" (whatever that means) or guys who wear skinny jeans. Therefore, I feel quite within my rights to judge that you're probably an idiot.
You think we should beat up all "pussy boys" (whatever that means) or guys who wear skinny jeans. Therefore, I feel quite within my rights to judge that you're probably an idiot.
0
Report
#38
(Original post by Lefty Leo)
Wonder how many people will "correct" 'an horrible place'.
Wonder how many people will "correct" 'an horrible place'.
0
Report
#39
(Original post by jakemittle)
"The first world"
"The first world"
0
Report
#40
(Original post by Onion Terror)
To be honest I think the onus is on you to explain why being physically attacked on the basis of what you're wearing is anything but a negative.
To be honest I think the onus is on you to explain why being physically attacked on the basis of what you're wearing is anything but a negative.
0
X
new posts
