Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    These can be fun and at the same time frustrating!
    Anyway, can anyone have a look at Number 12 on the:

    special relativity question list

    If the speed of the Klingon ship relative to the enterprise is zero, how can its length as observed on the enterprise, be different to its proper length? (No speed => no lorentz transformation)

    thanks again
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsunami)
    These can be fun and at the same time frustrating!
    Anyway, can anyone have a look at Number 12 on the:

    special relativity question list

    If the speed of the Klingon ship relative to the enterprise is zero, how can its length as observed on the enterprise, be different to its proper length? (No speed => no lorentz transformation)

    thanks again
    As the klingon ship and the enterprise are not moving relative to each other, both parties would observe each others ships to be the normal size. If another ship came along that was travelling much faster / slower relative to them then they would observe the length to be different.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    I don't get Special Relativity .
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nylex)
    I don't get Special Relativity .
    yes we should campaign to get SR removed from physics courses lol
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsunami)
    These can be fun and at the same time frustrating!
    Anyway, can anyone have a look at Number 12 on the:

    special relativity question list

    If the speed of the Klingon ship relative to the enterprise is zero, how can its length as observed on the enterprise, be different to its proper length? (No speed => no lorentz transformation)

    thanks again
    I can't access this from cambridge!
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsunami)
    These can be fun and at the same time frustrating!
    Anyway, can anyone have a look at Number 12 on the:

    special relativity question list

    If the speed of the Klingon ship relative to the enterprise is zero, how can its length as observed on the enterprise, be different to its proper length? (No speed => no lorentz transformation)

    thanks again
    I thought i had seen that question before......
    what college are you in?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by chrisbphd)
    I can't access this from cambridge!
    a bit of ox/bridge rivalry there..... the domain "ox.ac.uk" has probably been banned by the cambridge computing authorities
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsunami)
    These can be fun and at the same time frustrating!
    Anyway, can anyone have a look at Number 12 on the:

    special relativity question list

    If the speed of the Klingon ship relative to the enterprise is zero, how can its length as observed on the enterprise, be different to its proper length? (No speed => no lorentz transformation)

    thanks again
    anyway, in answer to your first question, same speed does not equal same velocity. you have to use the addition of velocities that you worked out for question 12.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by elpaw)
    anyway, in answer to your first question, same speed does not equal same velocity. you have to use the addition of velocities that you worked out for question 12.
    i actually was refering to 13 and not 12, but are you saying that the enterprise and the klingon ship are moving away from each other at the same speed 0.2c so effectivly the relative vel as observed by enterprise is 0.4c??
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsunami)
    i actually was refering to 13 and not 12, but are you saying that the enterprise and the klingon ship are moving away from each other at the same speed 0.2c so effectivly the relative vel as observed by enterprise is 0.4c??
    yes, except (if you have done q12) it isnt 0.4 c, because in relativity velocities don't add up that simply. from q12, V = (v1 + v2)/(1 + v1v2/c²) = 0.3846 c and use that to work out the length
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by elpaw)
    yes, except (if you have done q12) it isnt 0.4 c, because in relativity velocities don't add up that simply. from q12, V = (v1 + v2)/(1 + v1v2/c²) = 0.3846 c and use that to work out the length
    thanks!
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsunami)
    thanks!
    what college are you in?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by tsunami)
    yes we should campaign to get SR removed from physics courses lol
    I dunno, maybe when I understand it a bit better, it'll seem more interesting. Quantum Mechanics is quite boring .
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Nylex)
    I dunno, maybe when I understand it a bit better, it'll seem more interesting. Quantum Mechanics is quite boring .
    we dont do that until trinity term. (what do other universities call their terms?)
 
 
 
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.