Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    I want to develope intuition about maths. And yeah I was watching a program called psych.

    Basically, this gave me an idea.

    So yeah, I'm going to post four problems and you have only ten seconds to look at each questions(note, you have to look at each question before anwsering them so don't cheat). After you have looked at each question you need to anwser them but don't write anything down and you have only a minute. Also, yeah you might want to close your eyes. Note, no looking at the questions after ten seconds as thats cheating. Also, you have to anwser the question after you looked at all four.

    Anyway, to be nice if anyone else does this put what year you need to be able to anwser this.

    Anyway, here you go

    So yeah, official rules

    1. Look at all four questions, take 10 seconds on each.
    2. Close the spoilers and don't look at them
    3. You have one minute to anwser all four questions in your head. No paper.

    A2 level
    Spoiler:
    Show
    \int xlnx dx

    Spoiler:
    Show
    find \sum_{3}^{n}  n

    Spoiler:
    Show
    Prove \sum_{i=0}^{n} \binom{n}{i}=2^{n}

    Spoiler:
    Show
    Prove there does not exist integers m and n such that
    14m+20n=101


    Anyway, thats it.

    P.S. Does anyone feel smarter. Because, they have a chess tactics server that basically does the same thing. I wonder if this a similar effect.
    P.P.S. Also, somebody might want to make subtle error.
    P.P.P.S. I don't know if I would be able to do the above.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Simplicity)
    P.S. Does anyone feel smarter.
    No, I could feel my brain cells committing suicide as I read your post.
    P.P.S. Also, somebody might want to make subtle error.
    P.P.P.S. I don't know if I would be able to do the above.
    I'm pretty sure you are able...
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Simplicity)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    find \sum_3^{n}  n
    possible spoiler for Q.2
    Are those meant to both be n?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DFranklin)
    No, I could feel my brain cells committing suicide as I read your post.
    I'm pretty sure you are able...
    I'm a bit biased as I choose the questions and have already did them.

    But, yeah did you atleast attempt what I said.
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Spoiler:
    Show
    I cant really do parts in my head in 15 seconds....then remember the answer while I answer the other 3 questions
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ShortRef)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    I cant really do parts in my head in 15 seconds....then remember the answer while I answer the other 3 questions
    But, its mean't to develope intuition. You're meant to be able to think quickly and developed the abillity to have multiple chains of thought in your head plus remebering the other three questions. Its not that hard.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    @ShortRef: Yes, paper is cheap, pixels are even cheaper.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    I don't understand the link between that and mathematical intuition either. In my experience it's something that comes with exposure to mathematics, the more you do the better your instincts become and I don't think it's something you can objectively measure or improve directly. Your brain becomes used to things you have knowledge and experience with, otherwise you wouldn't be able to handle abstract mathematics.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Erdős)
    The lack of paper is (I believe) a somewhat arbitrary request. The challenge, I believe is not too hard.

    When will one be required to work at such a fast rate (and without paper)?

    Mathematical intuition on such basic questions is not tested (I believe). One needs Mathematical intuition (I imagine) to determine a new way to approach a problem, not something that must be done instantly (one can [with the exception of within an examination {and other strange times}] generally spend time to think and to write).
    Okay, I have changed it. Basically its to think quickly and in your head. Isn't thinking quicker better?

    In a bigger perspective I think it would aid intuition. As getting rid off logic to some degree and the possibility of going through it methodologically might inhance creativity.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Erdős)
    I do admit that thinking quickly can help "intuition" (I believe), due to the increased ability for the human to employ a "brute force" approach.

    The test (this thread) is probably well suited to quick thinking, however for the current A-Level generation much of the quick thinking that is done is specifically trained to certain problems. If one considers the final question (about 14m + 20n = 101), I believe that it is less likely that a standard A-Level candidate would complete this (aforementioned) question quickly (even though the question is not hard [I believe]) as it is not something that is likely to come up at A-Level (the other questions [in this thread] could [I believe] come up more often at A-Level).

    One should be wary of the quick thinking that is of the current A-Level candidates due to the (I believe) limited (in specific terms) nature of the aforementioned thinking. If one is to argue that quick thinking aims a "brute force" approach then one should also couple this quick thinking with a large skill set (not the specific type that many A-Level candidates have).
    Well, I guess they wouldn't be able to do the last question. However, I guess that wouldn't be a bad thing, espically since if your think quickly you might hit apon the solution i.e. 101 is odd.

    I didn't mean it to be specifically A-level. I was originally going to post some first year uni stuff that I have self studied. However, that wasen't the point of it. I think the improtant thing is that your thinking about what is essential and not minor details. For example in the binomial question you must think what is the binomial theorem then its pretty easy to deduce it.

    I wasen't specifically thinking brute force. I was thinking something that will take few calculations but relied more on conceptual understand i.e. one good insight. A good example is the above, it only involved one calculation i.e. factoring but you needed one good insight i.e. 101 is odd.
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    On a completely different topic, but a similar point, does anyone recommend Polya's 'How to Solve It'? Are the techniques actually applicable?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    I know lots of people rave about it, but it did virtually nothing for me, I'm afraid.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    Polya book is crap.

    All you really need to write is practice on the first page and thats pretty much maths.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    A2 questions , Can't answer them
    • PS Helper
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    PS Helper
    I don't really do A2 stuff but:
    Q2:
    Spoiler:
    Show

    Is that the sum from 3 to n for n? I just remember something like that in further maths. Again, im only AS.
    So, let me get this straight, if n were 5 it would be 3 + 4 +5? Right?
    It would be ((n)(n+1)/2) - 3 wouldn't it?


    cant do the others because ive never learnt anything like that yet.

    but yeah as others have said this is kinda silly. I think you need to think before you make a thread because you've really got a reputation for this kind of thing man.
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    I don't think I did them all in a minute, but I didn't time myself. For Q3 is this a good approach or is there a standard method that I've ignored?
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Consider (1+x)^n=\displaystyle\sum^n_{j=0  }\binom n j \cdot x^j\cdot 1^{n-j}
    Letting x=1 gives 2^n=\displaystyle\sum^n_{j=0}\bi  nom n j as required.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by around)
    On a completely different topic, but a similar point, does anyone recommend Polya's 'How to Solve It'? Are the techniques actually applicable?
    I don't recommend it as it cost money and it didn't help me in any way.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    big fat ass LOL at the last question.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by meatball893)
    I don't think I did them all in a minute, but I didn't time myself. For Q3 is this a good approach or is there a standard method that I've ignored?
    It's a good approach, and probably the one I'd go for, depending on who I was talking to.
    • Wiki Support Team
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    (Original post by Simplicity)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    \int xlnx dx
    Not sure I can be bothered.

    (Original post by Simplicity)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    find \sum_{3}^{n}  n
    Can you write this sum explicitly, please? As you've written it it doesn't make sense.

    (Original post by Simplicity)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Prove \sum_{i=0}^{n} \binom{n}{i}=2^{n}
    As above. And this certainly isn't A2 level.

    (Original post by Simplicity)
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Prove there does not exist integers m and n such that
    14m+20n=101
    LHS is even.

    That took me about three seconds.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What's your favourite Christmas sweets?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.