Just one sec...
Hey! Sign in to get help with your study questionsNew here? Join for free to post

Chelates!

Announcements Posted on
Take our short survey, £100 of Amazon vouchers to be won! 23-09-2016
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Just wondering if anyone could tell me why chelates are more stable than complexes containing unidendate lingands. Also, why are metal (III) chelates more stable than metal (II) chelates?

    Thanks alot for any help!
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Oh are they more stable because their formation involves an increase in entropy? I'm still not sure about the other bit though!
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Because:

    M(H20)6 2+ + 3en ---> M(en)3 2+ + 6H2O

    i.e. 4 to 7 species, therefore increase in entropy is highly favourable.



    Regarding the other point, I think it's just basic electrostatics. If you're pairing M(III) with say an edta 4- hexadentate ligand, then pure electrostatic attractions will be stronger when the metal is in the higher oxidation state.
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by anna123)
    Just wondering if anyone could tell me why chelates are more stable than complexes containing unidendate lingands. Also, why are metal (III) chelates more stable than metal (II) chelates?

    Thanks alot for any help!
    As the other posters say - entropy...

    .. but there is also the logical contribution from statistical likelihood of collision.

    A multidentate complex may lose bonding from one ligand position, but the other bonds maintain the detached atom with a potentially bonding lone pair in the same spacial region increasing its likelihood of re-attachment.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    0
    ReputationRep:
    Ok thank you both very much for your help!
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Entropy is the major driving force but enthaply plays a role.... If the ligands are charged, then there is a disfavourable interaction in bringing the multiple negatively charged ligands in close proximity to each other. In an equivalent charged chelate, these charges are already close together, hence enthalpy is more negative

Reply

Submit reply

Register

Thanks for posting! You just need to create an account in order to submit the post
  1. this can't be left blank
    that username has been taken, please choose another Forgotten your password?
  2. this can't be left blank
    this email is already registered. Forgotten your password?
  3. this can't be left blank

    6 characters or longer with both numbers and letters is safer

  4. this can't be left empty
    your full birthday is required
  1. Oops, you need to agree to our Ts&Cs to register
  2. Slide to join now Processing…

Updated: June 1, 2012
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Poll
Which would you rather be...?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22

Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Quick reply
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.