The Student Room Group
Reply 1
Yes i think so as it is attracted to an area of electron defficiency
no it's the electrophile

edit: the first one is, the second is a nucleophile.
Reply 3
Yes
Reply 4
Ben_Broadhurst
no it's the electrophile


NOT
Reply 5
http://www.chemguide.co.uk/mechanisms/eladd/symbr2.html

the 1st bromine (delta pos.) is an electrophile, which is why the reaction is categoried as "electrophilic addition", but the 2nd (neg.) bromide ion is a nucleophile.
wizz_kid
NOT


ok i didn't read the last sentence i thought he was talking about the other one
Reply 7
Ben_Broadhurst
ok i didn't read the last sentence i thought he was talking about the other one



It is still a nucleophile.
Reply 8
Br2 in the presence of alkene, the alkene rich in electron density polarises the bromine molecule, one side delta + and the other delta -. Therefore, it attacks bromine with delta +, giving you a Br- which then acts as a nucleophile and attacks the resulting carbocation from first step - you get dibromoalkane which is colourless.

And yes, Br- is a nucleophile.
Yes. If the entity attacks an area of electron defficiency it is a nucleophile - if an area of high electron density an electrophile. :smile:
Reply 10
There aren't many things with a negative charge that aren't nucleophiles (or bases), they generally want to push the electrons somewhere else or spread them out.
Reply 11
Nucleophile - an electron pair donor. You draw the curly arrow from the Br- to the carbocation, right? Therefore Br- is an electron pair donor - hence, a nucleophile.

Latest