I would say that it is the change from liquid to gaseous ethanol, as it is a hydrogencarbon molecule in which the electrons are able for intramolecular migration, so within the bonds what in turn changes the Vander Vaals forces and this is the cause for temporary dipole then. But I could be wrong.
Temporary id-id forces are a synonym of van der Waals (London) forces. This means you are looking for a compound in which there are no hydrogen bonds and no permanent dipole-dipole interactions.
Both O2 and C4H10 have no permanent dipole-dipole forces or hydrogen bonds (since O2 doesn’t consist of atoms with differing electronegativities and hydrocarbons are nonpolar, as the C-H electronegativity difference is small), but what do you notice about the state symbols for each option?
Temporary id-id forces are a synonym of van der Waals (London) forces. This means you are looking for a compound in which there are no hydrogen bonds and no permanent dipole-dipole interactions.
Both O2 and C4H10 have no permanent dipole-dipole forces or hydrogen bonds (since O2 doesn’t consist of atoms with differing electronegativities and hydrocarbons are nonpolar, as the C-H electronegativity difference is small), but what do you notice about the state symbols for each option?
In butane it is changing from liquid to solid and in oxygen, solid to liquid? How could i work it out from here? Thanks!
Temporary id-id forces are a synonym of van der Waals (London) forces. This means you are looking for a compound in which there are no hydrogen bonds and no permanent dipole-dipole interactions.
Both O2 and C4H10 have no permanent dipole-dipole forces or hydrogen bonds (since O2 doesn’t consist of atoms with differing electronegativities and hydrocarbons are nonpolar, as the C-H electronegativity difference is small), but what do you notice about the state symbols for each option?
vdW is id-id, pd-id and pd-pd.
Some exam boards suggested that vdW was only id-id, but they have now seen the error of their ways.
Some exam boards suggested that vdW was only id-id, but they have now seen the error of their ways.
I completely agree. I just wasn’t aware that any exam boards had ditched that egregious oversimplification and was working on the assumption that the question required it to be used.