Hi. The answer is -164. I know you need to multiply it by 2 because of the number of moles, but why is there a minus sign? How is this equation exothermic, aren't bonds being broken?
Hi. The answer is -164. I know you need to time it by 2 because of the number of moles, but why is there a minus sign? How is this equation exothermic, aren't bonds being broken?
Can someone explain to me?
Thanks.
Okay so enthalpy of formation refers to the enthalpy change when one mole of a compound is formed from its constituent elements under standard conditions. In this case, the enthalpy of formation of N2O is positive, meaning it is endothermic.
The reaction we're shown is the decomposition of N2O, i.e. the reversal of enthalpy of formation. Therefore, you reverse the sign as well, so you get -82kJmol-1. Now, since there are two moles of N2O, you multiply the value by 2 as you said, giving -164kJmol-1!
Hi. The answer is -164. I know you need to time it by 2 because of the number of moles, but why is there a minus sign? How is this equation exothermic, aren't bonds being broken?
Can someone explain to me?
Thanks.
In any reaction, bonds are both being broken AND made. Though, the energy values for breaking and making bonds are different most of the time. If a reaction is exothermic, it doesn't mean that no bonds are being broken, it means that it takes more energy to make the bonds than it did to break them.
Okay so enthalpy of formation refers to the enthalpy change when one mole of a compound is formed from its constituent elements under standard conditions. In this case, the enthalpy of formation of N2O is positive, meaning it is endothermic.
The reaction we're shown is the decomposition of N2O, i.e. the reversal of enthalpy of formation. Therefore, you reverse the sign as well, so you get -82kJmol-1. Now, since there are two moles of N2O, you multiply the value by 2 as you said, giving -164kJmol-1!
Hope that makes sense
So in order to form N20, 82kJ mol-1 will be required?
Since the equation given is the opposite of enthalpy of formation as its Substance -> constituents rather than Constituents -> Substance which is enthalpy of formation
then the enthalpy change is the opposite, therefore -ve. Enthalpy formation can be either +ve or -ve as mentioned by posters above.