The problem I have with the whole 'the girls are exploited' campaign is that I'd bet at least 90% of these campaigners are not actively campaigning against sweatshops, I reckon the kids in sweatshops would love to be 'exploited' for hundreds of thousands of pounds, compared to being exploited for pennies so Western people can wear cheap clothing. I've seen no evidence apart from unreliable 'friend of a friend' anecdotes to show the girls in porn are being exploited any more than say a supermarket would exploit the poor by giving them minimum wage because they know workers will take what they can get. Female pornstars are rich, if they were being held against their will to make more porn I doubt the companies would be giving them so much money, at the end of the day the girls aren't being forced to do it, they've made that choice and they could leave whenever they wanted to. Are the companies preying on girls that are screwed up or desperate? Yes they probably are to an extent but it is still the girl's choice to do it, should we round up every girl in America, give them a psychiatric evaluation and if they are found to be slightly screwed up dictate how they should live their life? If the girl is comfortable to expose herself to that life then why should anyone have the right to say no to that? People who want porn banned don't seem to understand that right now the industry is regulated, there are millions of porn addicts, do you think that banning porn would stop them from trying to find it?
Ban porn and it goes to the black market, and when that happens the girls really will be being held against their will.