Whining feminists VS whinging boys

Not quite. Resources are transferred from men to women in all societies. The issue of contention is over whether men may attach conditions and responsibilities to those transfers, or whether they should be performed anonymously by the state.

The feminists need resources and don't want to be told what to do. The state can perform this for them.

The "Red Pill" men are just resentful largely lower-status males whose resources are being extracted but who aren't getting what they feel to be their side of the deal.

Case in point.

TSR is filled with countless semi-literate posts from new-age Tumblr feminists and whinging "Red Pill" men. Most of these posts resemble the kind of arguments that manipulative children use in the school playground. They're typically woven together with a mixture of flimsy rhetoric, misguided straw-man arguments, and feeble attempts to try to appear morally superior.

Because they spend so much time arguing with each other, they begin to believe that anyone who disagrees with their opinions must belong to the other group.

Red pill men seem to think that anyone who believes it's not a woman's duty to stay at home, cook dinner, do the house work, appear "dignified", wear pretty dresses, be sub-ordinate to men, and that there's no such thing as 'beta' and 'alpha' men, must be feminists.

Feminists seem to believe that you must be a misogynistic pig if you are of the opinion that the sexes are treated equally well in this country, "sexual objectification" either is meaningless or not harmful, "rape culture" is a meaningless piece of rhetoric, or that stay at home mothers don't deserve abuse.

These are both completely stupid perspectives. But one is not surprised at this level of stupidity when one realizes the most fundamental element at play here: the individuals belonging to both groups are very similar and all have these opinions for exactly the same reasons.

These reasons are:

1. They like to feel part of something. This makes them feel better about themselves.

2. They're unintelligent. Anyone who's views are completely predictable is unintelligent, as it clearly shows that they are unable to form their own opinions.

3. They love the attention.

4. They're both what's known as 'compensatory narcissists', which is described as someone who:

"Seeks to counteract or cancel out deep feelings of inferiority and lack of self-esteem; offsets deficits by creating illusions of being superior, exceptional, admirable, noteworthy; self-worth results from self-enhancement."

That is all. Stay cool.

Alright, I put my hands up and admit I am guilty of being one of the whining feminists. I don't think I'm at the worst end of the spectrum (I hope, as I do really care about the effects of gender inequality on men), but the opinions I do have are ones I am very passionate about.

I often try not to raise my temper too much on here, and try to keep it to a discussion, rather than a full blown argument.

Feminism is the hatred of lower value men.

So you hate lower value men?

Pathetic

i no mate writin lots of words nd thinking lots of stuff is so beta nd nerdy. but lyk dis is a forum for lyk discussing stuff so thts kinda wat its about. maybe it isnt for u nd u shud go to a site with ppl more like u who r all alpha nd stuff nd fink its cool to be feckless morons.

You show the same distaste for red pill males as some feminists and also the same distaste for feminists as red pill males.

And you often comment in the same manner so much of your post can be applied to yourself.

That's the entire point of the post.



This is an ad-hominem remark and not a counter argument.

Um, no? When on earth did I suggest that?

I did highlight that I do also have passion for the effects of gender in equality on men.

I spy a troll.

It is clear that feminism is the hatred of lower value men. That is why they want independence from men (except when they're good looking or wealthy).

Women ahve more rights than men and make huge financial gains from men. If you truly cared abut equality you would fight to reduce the financial burden on men and change family laws.

Instead you focus on getting a high value men or atleast taking money from lower value men with no transactional element involved.

Ah right, I see. Well I suppose this must be correct since you must already know my viewpoints through telepathy.


Disclaimer: Please do not actually believe that this guy knows what he is talking about.

I hate to break it to you, but you are both whining and whinging.

You talk about straw men then go on the create this 'red pill man'.. Funny

This is the age of collectivism. Those who don't organise into a special interest group and play the identity politics game will find themselves being plundered by those who do.

By the way this is ridiculous:

You're pathologising accomplishment.