Why is fascism evil, but Communism isn't?

Human civilisation is a revolt against nature.

Agree with the OP.

It's essentially national socialism vs. international socialism. Socialism is bad, but international socialism is destructive and far more authoritarian than national socialism, because it does not force different people together or destroy tradition. Although, both fascism and communism were great at silencing dissent.

I think Britain and the Netherlands had the most free people in all of Europe.

No it isn't. It doesn't contradict reality.
Egalitarianism does. Humans are not born equal.

Look at the death tolls of various Communist regimes around the world. Why do these crimes go ignored while everything is about the Nazi's? Let us not forget that the Nazi's were even framed for crimes like Katyn massacre that was by the Soviets.


Is this the biggest double standard in history?

Communist symbol should be more offensive than any Swastika given how many suffered because of it.

Human civilisation is a revolt against nature.

Doesn't mean they shouldn't be treated equally.

They should have equal rights but that is it.

How can you believe in equal treatment if it is permissible to take from some and not from others?

3. Communism is the belief that all people are equal and should be free from oppression, all industry should be owned by the people for the people and no one should be better off than anyone else. This is ultimately a good thing, it is the moral thing.

4. If the OP meant Stalinism then I'd concede that yes that's just as bad as Fascism. But Communism, no matter what side of the spectrum you're on, whether or not you think it can be achieved, ultimately has good hearted values behind it whereas Fascism does not.

Ok.

I can't see whatever it is...

1. Socialism isn't bad, it's done more for the people than any other political movement.

2. National Socialism is only socialist by name, it's just purely fascism which is nationalism and authoritarianism by nature which leads to racism and oppression naturally.

3. Communism is the belief that all people are equal and should be free from oppression, all industry should be owned by the people for the people and no one should be better off than anyone else. This is ultimately a good thing, it is the moral thing.

4. If the OP meant Stalinism then I'd concede that yes that's just as bad as Fascism. But Communism, no matter what side of the spectrum you're on, whether or not you think it can be achieved, ultimately has good hearted values behind it whereas Fascism does not.

Socialism and Communism advocate theft and rule of the mob. They lead to poorer economies were innovation and risk taking (entrepreneurs creating business and wealth) is punished.

National Socialism was a socialist state. Factories were run by the state, factories "owners" were not truly owners at all. They had to comply with what the state ordered them to make and how many to make.

Communism is incompatible with the nature of reality. People are not of equal ability and intelligence. It is not right to deny people to use their abilities to profit through cooperation.

Socialism and Communism inevitably lead to totalitarianism. It is the only way to you can truly control the economy.

1. I'd argue that it's the opposite, it leads to more people being capable due to state education (product of socialism) and such to be able to go out and become wealth generators which therefore helps the economy.

2. True as well, but I was making the point about Fascism, communism and fascism are very different.

3. Exactly, profit through cooperation! Socialism is the embodiment of Cooperation and allows many more to profit than just a select few.

4. While this is true of communism (as I have said, I'm not a communist) this is not true of the libertarian strains of socialism.

The state will teach children what is in their own interest and parents do not get much of a say. In a free society, parents will send to their children to a school of their choice dependant on what values they subscribe to.
There may be other alternatives such as home schooling etc.

It is rarely that anyone who goes to a state school is a "wealth generator". Wealth is only really created by entrepreneurs.
Also the who fact that socialist state spend money that doesn't even exist.

Select few profit? Everyone profits. Profit just means you are making a net gain.

4. Libertarian socialism cannot exist. It will eventually lead to a state or some centralised body.
Democratic rule just because the state.

Look at the death tolls of various Communist regimes around the world. Why do these crimes go ignored while everything is about the Nazi's? Let us not forget that the Nazi's were even framed for crimes like Katyn massacre that was by the Soviets.


Is this the biggest double standard in history?

Communist symbol should be more offensive than any Swastika given how many suffered because of it.

Because communism still is in use today and is being used by the elites to trick people into thinking it is the only other solution to corrupt capitalism so they have made it more acceptable even though it did kill more people.

Oh you still think that the rich and elites hate communism oh no they love the movement if they control it and hate it if they don't. Globalism uses communism and socialism as the attractive new trendy alternative to capitalist corruption when it is even more corrupt and authoritarian than what we live in now.