Why do universities allow evil Communist societies yet not Nazi societies?

Because you, like just about everyone on the right has failed to make the distinction between the ideology of communism and brutal dictators using it as an excuse.

There is nothing in the communist ideology about murder - there is nothing discriminatory in the ideology. At the heart of it is that we are all equal- you may disagree with that but unlike the Nazi ideology it. Does not advocate genocide or mass murder.

Violent revolution doesn't involve mass murder?

It's not the idea of communism that killed all those people , it was misuse of it that did


Posted from TSR Mobile

Because anything to the right of Cameron is "fascist" and evil

The figures for the number of deaths under socialist states are greatly exaggerated by those whose interests are put in peril by any organisation of workers against capitalism, and to blame what deaths did occur on an ideology or singular leaders is revisionist and insane. Natural disasters (Great Leap Forward) and historical factors (two world wars and a civil war in Russia, none of which affected the US) are all potential reasons for deaths, along with some poor decisions by some leaders, which hardly has anything to do with communism.

On 16 June 1941, as Hitler readied his forces for Operation Barbarossa, Josef Goebbels looked forward to the new order that the Nazis would impose on a conquered Russia. There would be no come-back, he wrote, for capitalists nor priests nor Tsars.

Rather, in the place of debased, Jewish Bolshevism, the Wehrmacht would deliver “der echte Sozialismus”: real socialism.Goebbels never doubted that he was a socialist. He understood Nazism to be a better and more plausible form of socialism than that propagated by Lenin. Instead of spreading itself across different nations, it would operate within the unit of the Volk.

So total is the cultural victory of the modern Left that the merely to recount this fact is jarring. But few at the time would have found it especially contentious.

As George Watson put it in The Lost Literature of Socialism:

It is now clear beyond all reasonable doubt that Hitler and his associates believed they were socialists, and that others, including democratic socialists, thought so too.

Because you, like just about everyone on the right has failed to make the distinction between the ideology of communism and brutal dictators using it as an excuse.

There is nothing in the communist ideology about murder - there is nothing discriminatory in the ideology. At the heart of it is that we are all equal- you may disagree with that but unlike the Nazi ideology it. Does not advocate genocide or mass murder.

Well in that case, Mussolini, Franco and Hitler are poor representatives of Nationalism.

It works both ways, and in both cases it is wrong.

No it works when goyim are in charge of any nation. After the Holocaust they cannot be trusted with any ideology that does not involve diversity and tolerance, and they need supervision.

The Jews are only ones who have successfully run a homeland in recent history.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Somebody is red-pilled

The Great Leap Forward was a natural disaster?

Don't worry. I was talking very high level. You would not understand.

What is important is that you understand that the Nazis are evil but we need certain aspects of communism like equality and Trotsky like anti-racism as society needs to be a manageable unit.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Well in that case, Mussolini, Franco and Hitler are poor representatives of Nationalism.

It works both ways, and in both cases it is wrong.