And the more we give in to this nonsense the worse things become. Our forefathers did not fight two world wars for us to succumb to this namby pamby political correctness

Reply 5

Asolare

I'd like her to tell me what is so humiliating about being asked to use the disabled toilets which are non-gender specific? Is being disabled a humiliating thing now?

(edited 7 years ago)

Reply 6

chazwomaq

She argued the use of words rather than symbols on toilets amounted to indirect discrimination.

Can anyone explain this?

Reply 7

Armastan

Just use disabled toilets if you're that bothered by the ladies/gents signs on toilet doors. >.<

Reply 8

ODES_PDES

I can only shake my head

Reply 9

Tiger Rag

Original post by Inexorably

I'd like her to tell me what is so humiliating about being asked to use the disabled toilets which are non-gender specific? Is being disabled a humiliating thing now?

But being transexual isn't a disability.

This case makes no sense at all. I can't see how changing the signs will make any difference.

Reply 10

z33

Why can't she just use the ladies toilet? Isn't she a woman? How is that indirect dicrimination... I don't get it.
It says "ladies" and "gents" not "vagina" and "penis" smh :colonhash:

Reply 11

RobML

Original post by z33

Why can't she just use the ladies toilet? Isn't she a woman? How is that indirect dicrimination... I don't get it.
It says "ladies" and "gents" not "vagina" and "penis" smh :colonhash:

I don't get it either. She was discriminated against by being made to use the disabled toliets, but I don't see how the use of "ladies" and "gentleman" for the toilets is relevant. She identifies as a lady, after all.

Reply 12

Xepz

Lol .... Only way to fix the problem with everyone happy is to just add trans toilers male/female ...

Reply 13

z33

Original post by RobML

Exactly that's what I thought... it would've made more sense if she was non-binary or agender but she does identify as a LADY so why can't she use the LADIES' toilets... hmmm

Yeah being made to use the disabled toilets was discrimination I agree (didn't read that part :redface:

) - but the signs thing? come on...

Reply 14

Miss Maddie

The company should appeal and put the sign there. There is nothing wrong with asking a transgender person to use the right toilet.

Reply 15

RobML

Original post by Madeline_H95

The company should appeal and put the sign there. There is nothing wrong with asking a transgender person to use the right toilet.

You're suggesting disabled is the right toilet?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 16

Miss Maddie

Original post by RobML

You're suggesting disabled is the right toilet?

Posted from TSR Mobile

The right toilet is going in the toilet of their sex. If they don't want to do that the disabled toilet for what is comparable a mental disability is right.

Reply 17

RobML

Original post by Madeline_H95

The right toilet is going in the toilet of their sex. If they don't want to do that the disabled toilet for what is comparable a mental disability is right.

In what way is a transgender person "mentally disabled"?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 18

SmileyVibe

If I was on that cruise I would be upset. So the people who surrounded him could not use the right bathroom because he felt so insecure of his own gender/sex? You know something is not right in the mind when two labels woman and men bathroom just trigger you, lol.

Reply 19

username1494226

This is society now folks. This is what you wanted it to be. I'm just playing ignorant to most of it now because it seems to become more complicated with each passing day. That's the 21st Century. People complaining over bathroom door signs.