Sexual behaviours judged throughout time.

There are effects of the act that "consent" doesn't account for. If I go and consent to watching degrading porn, that affects my conception of sex and affects future relationships I might have, how I perceive women etc. So there are negative effects outside of the "circle of consent" that haven't been considered.

By the way, society has become pretty much totally open about sex now. Pretending we've been repressed is so 60s.

There are effects of the act that "consent" doesn't account for. If I go and consent to watching degrading porn, that affects my conception of sex and affects future relationships I might have, how I perceive women etc. So there are negative effects outside of the "circle of consent" that haven't been considered.

That's a leap of reasoning, at least if you are implying that the "negative effects" are significant. Its a bit like saying someone who watches action movies is going to become violent. Maybe, but realistically people know that real-life isn't quite like what is portrayed in a porn/action movie, and the effects of watching such porn/action movies are negligible.

I don't think that's a good analogy. (Essentially) everybody who watches horror films knows that hacking someone's head off and eating their brains isn't acceptable, as it contravenes moral standards. But not everyone who watches certain sexual acts knows they're purely meant to be confined to the world of fantasy or are meant to take place purely within the realms of consent and respect. There isn't the same stigma attached to degrading sexual practice as there is murder and torture. Thus, porn has a greater capacity to be misused.

That's a really interesting point actually, maybe the positive womans rights movement also effected womans self expression in this way???

It is, pretty much in totality, because of religion, which galvanised masses to act and behave in a certain way. In ancient Greece, they were pre- Christianity. That hits, and suddenly you are a whore if you sleep around, are a sinner if you have same-sex relationships, etc etc etc.

People should realise, when you call a girl a slag, you are backwards because you haven't shaken off old religious shackles that try to dictate the proper rules of behaviour to this day, despite bearing little relevance ot the modern world.

I've heard before that feminism is the main reason why prostitution is seen as bad. Nowadays christianity seems to be against it but in the middle ages the catholic church found it a good idea (mainly because it reduced masturbation).

Before the pill and the condom were widely available, how did people have recreational sex? They clearly didn't all have monthly abortions, or just have 30 children.
And don't just say "they didn't have recreational sex", because thats patently not going to be the case.

Answers on a postcard.

this kinda thing is exactly my point, hypocrisy that has developed over time, i mean it used to be acceptable.

You do know that the likelihood of getting pregnant off a single session is quite small, right?

And they used to have sex either with pulling out before coming or while the girl was on her period

If they liked that sort of sex is it still bad?

The things like double anal, deepthroating, multiple facials and double penetration were probably bad examples to use. A better example would be the casting style porn you find a lot of where the plot is:

1) Find dumb whore
2) Convince her that they'll give her a modelling contract if she lets them stick it in her pooper
3) Run out without paying her

Do you honestly think you could find any woman without serious mental issues who would think that erotic?