The one who is incapable of answering a question, is not fit to be anything. Yankee. Just look at it, you're not letting others debate are you? Its only your view is correct,and others can't fight back is it? You people that don't support the fact that capitial punishment should be bought back in. Oh wow, great! If someone murders someone, you won't allow the state to murder them? No, they should die. murderers can be rehabilitated
Criminals can never be of that level to do that.
The state does it in justice, I assure you that. The US Marshalls of their time had no problem in hanging em outlaws out there. So how did it affect the state?
Now, suppose circumstances were the same. Why should all treatment be the same? No two people are identical; and some people are very highly unlikely to reoffend (use a risk assessment measure with the psychopathy index). Why shouldn't the person who is very unlikely to reoffend be released earlier than someone who is?Finally, countries which use a rehabilitation form of justice system are, usually, better off than those which use a punishment system.
So what you're saying is release psychopaths into society? Hey everybody, we have meatballs wanting to rule this country! Release the one which is ''less dangerous''. And what if the less dangerous becomes dangerous again?
Have you ever actually taken the time to study the sociology of crime?
No, do you have a life? At all?
Cime is very multi-dimensional, and since crime is very multi-dimensional, our treatment of criminals should be based on a case-by-case basis; not merely you committed X so you get P years, no exceptions.
No has the time in the world to understand it all. It shouldn't be case by case or we'd be solving their problems instead of ours. Tell me, as a taxpayer, why should half of my salary go to help prisionors to get rehabilitated into society? If the prisoner has done the crime , he must be punished, That is the basic fundamentalist system which has been running on for 2000 years and you are saying it remove it? Your head is full of crap.
Finally, countries which use a rehabilitation form of justice system are, usually, better off than those which use a punishment system.
List some.
We are soft in this country and it is being led by fools like you! Yankee, you may go back to the Union, but as Southerner, I ain't gonna give up till you shut up. We don't need to be soft, we can kill the prisoner there and then. It ''prevents'' crime from happening.
Oh and regarding your '' oh wow,'' sarcastic comments, keep it to yourself. I respect your opinion, but you're resorting to very cheap tactics in order to approve your superiority. I got one word for you: It ain't. Let the guy you're trying to grill at least answer. You're giving him none of that. If this debate was for highly ''civilized people'' Then what the hell are you doing here then? Go and start a new thread and talk in the way you want it, but don't, please don't try and impose on it on others. You go on YouTube and you see what I will do to you. But don't try and impose things on people have the least cared moment about.
I suggest you spend some time actually studying the ethics, psychology and sociology behind law, justice and crime.
No. No one's here to waste time in researching all of that. Let other's debate or you'll be having a funny end at this side of the arguement.
If killing people is bad, then regardless of whose doing it killing is still bad; therefore, the State would be acting wrongly and it would not be justice. Welcome to logical argumentation and very basic ethics.
Welcome to History: If someone has killed someone, that murdered should be hanged or shot. - Basic system running for almost 2000 years now. US Marshalls hanged outlaws, Nazi Criminals were trialled to be executed. Research some history.
Yes, in fact, you did. Your India example was an attempt to show that being harsh on crime deters crime.
No, it wasn't. I was giving you examples of how nations made their prisons nasty.
Again, get a life, get a job, more than that, learn to openly take in criticism. Learn to accept that people's views are different from yours and that they'll differ. Learn that they won't agree with everything you've said. I don't see a very foreseeable future for you with that kind of attitude.