What bothers me is that you're trying to make people aware that they need to consider the nature of a university before committing to go there, but the way you're going about this is portraying St Andrews in a very, very negative way.
Yes, it doesn't suit you, yes, you're allowed to voice your own opinion, but in doing that, it's irresponsible to suggest that the entire library system is substandard, or that all the teaching is bad, or that the whole town will be boring to everyone, when that's evidently not true. If the tutoring of a particular module in a particular department is bad, then it's great to let people know, but in communicating this, it shouldn't sound like all the teaching in all the modules in all the departments is bad.
You could have achieved your original goal in a much more helpful way, by saying what things you sought and that St Andrews didn't suit your lifestyle. The title is very negative, and as I said before, I think this thread is more likely to make people think 'Oh, St Andrews is awful', rather than thinking, 'I should consider the nature of a university before committing to study there for several years'. I admire the intention of encouraging people to do some research on universities before choosing, but I do not admire how this thread is reaching that goal.