This discussion is now closed.

Check out other Related discussions

A New Definition of a Triple Delta Function

G. Lee

Yes, that is rigorous scientific approach. If you don't like it, then why don't you cut it down if its that simple. Surely the work above will not take you any longer than 15 mins if you are so arrogantly confident.

So you state that N≥1 in your OP, then when someone asked what N was, you tell them that it's any integer? FAIL.
Then you tell me that this is a rigorous scientific approach. :rofl:

I think I'll go to bed and let you enjoy yourself with your rigorous science.

Reply 21

G. Lee

OP

8

Any possible integer which is less than or equal to 1. These are the integers being recognized thus far at that part. respresents any integer due to the inequality.

Is this what confused people?

Reply 22

G. Lee

OP

8

To change this to suit any integer of the choice -1, 0 or 1, then we just apply the formula's i gave. Simple.

Reply 23

In2deep

14

G. Lee

N

is any integer.

I think I get it now, that confused me :p:

What does integer mean though? :s-smilie:

Reply 24

G. Lee

OP

8

Look, there is nothing wrong stating it's any integer so long as the inequality is reconized to produce at least more than one integer; in this case it is, and i do believe you should go to bed and get a good night ~ day sleep.

Reply 25

G. Lee

OP

8

In2deep

I think I get it now, that confused me :p:

What does integer mean though? :s-smilie:

An integer is a whole number, such as 1, 0 or even -122. Anything on the real or complex range.

Reply 26

In2deep

14

G. Lee

An integer is a whole number, such as 1, 0 or even -122. Anything on the real or complex range.

LOOL -122 is a real number?

how can you have -122 Apples (for example)? :rolleyes:

that is unreal tbh

Reply 27

Farhan.Hanif93

18

In2deep

LOOL -122 is a real number?

how can you have -122 Apples (for example)? :rolleyes:

that is unreal tbh

Sounds pretty fake if you ask me. G.Lee, do you understand that to have -122 apples, you need fake numbers?

Reply 28

G. Lee

OP

8

Farhan.Hanif93

Sounds pretty fake if you ask me. G.Lee, do you understand that to have -122 apples, you need fake numbers?

Ah, so now we have reverted to jokes. This is a classic sign of trying to avoid the issue at hand, which you must come to realize, you have made an error and construded information terribly.

Reply 29

In2deep

14

G. Lee

Ah, so now we have reverted to jokes. This is a classic sign of trying to avoid the issue at hand, which you must come to realize, you have made an error and construded information terribly.

I shall only take you seriously if you try to explain it all step by step. Now how can you get -122 apples, serious question? :smile:

Reply 30

G. Lee

OP

8

Also, integers need not be real numbers.

Surely you do realize that imaginary numbers are pivotal in the foundation of mathematics, and is considered just as ''real'' as any positive number?

Reply 31

G. Lee

OP

8

In2deep

I shall only take you seriously if you try to explain it all step by step. Now how can you get -122 apples, serious question? :smile:

Yes, it's funny... but if i hear it again, i dred it may wear out :wink:

Reply 32

Farhan.Hanif93

18

G. Lee

Ah, so now we have reverted to jokes. This is a classic sign of trying to avoid the issue at hand, which you must come to realize, you have made an error and construded information terribly.

Say wha... :eyeball:

You be trippin' brotha.
I'll take you seriously if you can explain your whole OP to me WITHOUT contradicting yourself or spouting ****.

ur ma

G. Lee

Also, integers need not be real numbers.

So

\mathbb{Z} \not \subset \mathbb{R}

? And you said earlier that -1 is an imaginary number -- wuttuff?

Reply 35

G. Lee

OP

8

Swayum

This was explained.

If 0, 1 have a range in

N \geq 1

so

(-1)x_nn \geq 1

means that it has a new range of -1 to 1, but we can include the 0, because it is also an integer.

Reply 36

G. Lee

OP

8

sorry mistake above - hold on.

Reply 37

G. Lee

OP

8

nuodai

So

\mathbb{Z} \not \subset \mathbb{R}

? And you said earlier that -1 is an imaginary number -- wuttuff?

Yes and what can -1 =?

Obviously the imaginary/complex quantity

i^2

.

Reply 38

G. Lee

OP

8

Farhan.Hanif93

Say wha... :eyeball:

You be trippin' brotha.
I'll take you seriously if you can explain your whole OP to me WITHOUT contradicting yourself or spouting ****.

I will deviate with you, no more. You have no interest in common decency when talking to people.

Reply 39

sunnymiru

G. Lee

Also, integers need not be real numbers.

Surely you do realize that imaginary numbers are pivotal in the foundation of mathematics, and is considered just as ''real'' as any positive number?

Imaginary numbers are complex numbers... Real numbers are complex, but the imaginary ones are only part of C..

A New Definition of a Triple Delta Function

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you