Has anyone had any experience of being offered an alternate form of assessment for a module? Say for example a module assessment was comprised of an examination weighted at 50% and then an oral presentation also weighted at 50%, and if doing an oral presentation would adversely affect a student in receipt of DSA, then that student could be allowed to do a piece of written coursework in place of the oral presentation, so long as the coursework assessed the same learning outcomes and objectives as the oral presentation did.
In my DSA assessment of needs report, reference was made by the assessor that oral presentations (particularly those which are required to be delivered solo) may aggravate a medical condition I have as well as my anxiety disorder and would interfere with my ability to perform as normal and demonstrate my knowledge and understanding in the way that non disabled students could. Therefore they recommended that if such a situation arose, that the university strongly considered looking into the option of offering an alternate form of assessment (i.e. a reasonable adjustment) that tested the same learning outcomes and objectives as the oral presentation did.
Such a situation has arisen, but my university have been less than enthusiastic about implementing such an adjustment. I did deliver the oral presentation back in May as part of the module and also sat the examination. Although I did okay in the exam, my mark in the oral presentation really pulled me down and when averaged out, was the contributing factor to my failing the module. I had terrible problems with anxiety and stress in the build up to the presentation and in the lecture theatre itself, which aggravated my medical condition and started to cause pains in my stomach. Therefore this meant that I was having difficulty in concentrating. I was getting very hot and flustered with sweaty palms and really wasn’t able to perform at my best as a result of this. It wasn’t a full on panic attack, but I did feel close to having one. It wasn’t just a case of nerves over public speaking to 240 people that you’d expect most people to get. It was a real case of fear, which in turn caused my health to suffer, and for me not to perform at my best.
I submitted a special consideration form along with medical evidence and as such, was awarded an honours resit (where you can resit for full marks and the usual resit fee is waived) This time, I contacted my department and the student support office as soon as I received my resit offer and asked them to consider an alternate assessment (some written coursework for example) as outlined in my assessment of needs report. I was backed up by the student support office who has staff members who are also licensed assessors themselves. I also made it clear I would be more than happy to seek further medical evidence if that’s what they wanted, even though they already had my report and several letters already on my file.
Initially the department told me it wouldn’t be possible, as the university had no provision for that sort of thing. Awarding extra time, a rest break or the use of a computer, yes – but they did not have any policy on alternate assessment and told me that even with special circumstances it was “unlikely” the faculty and the university would consider my request. This is despite it being recommended in my DSA assessment of needs report by a qualified assessor.
When I pointed out that the university does have a policy on it and that other students in the same faculty as us had been allowed to do this and after I’d showed them the university’s regulations on assessing disabled students, they changed tack and told me it wasn’t allowed because of the course accreditation by our professional body. They had accredited the course based on what the department had submitted to them and changing from an oral presentation to coursework would render that void. As a student member of our professional body, I contacted them to ask that question. They said that was nonsense and that they do not accredit a course based on what assessment method the university uses; it’s done on what the course actually teaches you i.e. the learning outcomes and if they give students enough professional knowledge and skills. The method of assessment is irrelevant and is up to the university to decide.
I took this information back to my department and they said “Oh well it’s too late now as the resit period is nearly upon us and there’s no time now to set some alternate assessment and have it approved by faculty. You’ll just have to come back and do the resit as normal.” I went back and did the resit as normal, and failed again.
This time they’re saying that I can’t resit again as you can only do one resit. Therefore they’re saying it’s though and I’ve failed the module for good. However, I want to challenge that on an equality basis. Had they implemented alternate arrangements as was recommended in my assessment of needs, as backed up by the student support office and my GP, I feel I would have passed. It wasn’t a lack of subject knowledge that was the problem, but I really found the mode of assessment inaccessible as a disabled student, so asked for a reasonable adjustment, which they failed to provide even though I had a good case.
I was just wondering if anyone else has ever had an alternate form of assessment provided for them and if so, how easy was it to obtain? It seems my university aren’t keen and I think that’s not right.