Edexcel Psychology Unit 4

The evaluation question asked you to evaluate the explanation of anorexia you used initially, using research. It also asked to include a comparison in your evaluation.

The evaluation question asked you to evaluate the explanation of anorexia you used initially, using research. It also asked to include a comparison in your evaluation.

The evaluation question asked you to evaluate the explanation of anorexia you used initially, using research. It also asked to include a comparison in your evaluation.

Btw- do you remember the marks?
Abnormality 12
Anorexia explanati and eval. 8
Therapy-token economies- descr and eval 12?
Goldstein - desc and eval. 9?
Pratical - outcome. 2 or 3?
Secondary data. 6?
Hmmm... Dont seem to add up

Btw- do you remember the marks?
Abnormality 12
Anorexia explanati and eval. 8
Therapy-token economies- descr and eval 12?
Goldstein - desc and eval. 9?
Pratical - outcome. 2 or 3?
Secondary data. 6?
Hmmm... Dont seem to add up

There was only one 12 marker so I think the token economy one might have been 8

Anyone have any details on the questions on sciences.? There was a 2 marker and the rest? Trying to get an approximate raw grade overall

I seem to be the only one who did the other 18 marker and not the ethics one

Here are the ones I answered... I *think* this is correct.

CLINICAL

Alternative study to Schizophrenia (i.e. Not Rosenhan)
/8
Practical Leaflet
/9
Token Economy (or alternative) example
/9
Unipolar Depression (or alternative illness)
/7
Definitions of Abnormality
/12

TOTAL = 45

ISSUES AND DEBATES

A scientific aspect of a study
/2
Psychodynamic Questions (one was about it not being a science)
/10
Article on nature-nurture
/5
Evaluating and planning a study
/10
The ethical issues within studies (or alternative)
/18

TOTAL = /45

Crap you had to write it as a article? I just wrote it in general?

i did B too. I wrote about Agency theory, and the fact that Milgram and Hofling back it up, but there are other studies that say there must be some sort of in between stage, the i did Eye Witness testimony, and i worte about how reconstructive memory means its not reliable anymore, and trials based on EWT are a major problem in society. i found it way easier...

Phew! I wrote about Agency theory, Social Learning theory, EWT and gave a real life example of someone being wrongfully convicted and like a line one the biological approach i can't even remember what examples,if any, that i put now