The Student Room Group

Edexcel Economics Unit 4: 20th June 2012

Scroll to see replies

Reply 780
Original post by hannah_27
Prebish-Singer Hypothesis.
anyone care to explain......what, when, why???


What does the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis state?


That countries that export commodities would be able to import less and less for a given level of exports. Terms of trade for primary commodity exporters had a tendency to decline due to manufactured good's greater income elasticity of demand, making their prices rise more rapidly relative to primary product prices.
guys love you allllllllllllllllllllllll
Reply 782
also - crowding out???
Reply 783
Original post by sunnybacon
Retaliation from other countries.
Revenue for the government (in the case of tariffs).
X-inefficiency as firms don't face competition from international competitors.


Original post by XxAmxX
Hard to remove barriers once they are in place,
correct BOP deficit
stable employment
increase tax revenue-> whatever they do with the revenue


Isn't it the effect on the "global economy" so retaliation, BOP and tax revenue wouldn't really apply?
How do you evaluate the factors that determine competitiveness?
e.g price, unit costs, tax rates, productivity, technology, inflation
What exactly do you need to do when a question refers to the 'effects on the global economy'?
Reply 786
Original post by Mtice
Isn't it the effect on the "global economy" so retaliation, BOP and tax revenue wouldn't really apply?


ah sorry saw what i wanted to see there!
Reply 787
Original post by Dark_angel_hime
How do you evaluate the factors that determine competitiveness?
e.g price, unit costs, tax rates, productivity, technology, inflation


Producers may choose to just improve their profit margins, instead of lowering prices, so their goods may not become more competitive.
Reply 788
Original post by JuxtaposedJames
Just going for dinner. When I return I will be posting my Strategies for growth and development in a nutshell


please quote me when you do
Original post by Mtice
Isn't it the effect on the "global economy" so retaliation, BOP and tax revenue wouldn't really apply?


Oh right yeah, didn't read the question. :tongue:
There would be reduced trade overall due to the higher prices.
Could lead to various countries suffering from import inflation if tariffs are imposed on goods which have high inelasticies of demand.
Reply 790
Original post by ugk4life
please quote me when you do

http://flashcarddb.com/cardset/77929-edexcel-a2-economics-unit-4-flashcards

that stuff is at the top of these cards
Reply 791
Lol I am ******* myself.
Reply 792


oh wow that site looks amazing, thanks a lot.
Original post by Tsunami2011
What exactly do you need to do when a question refers to the 'effects on the global economy'?


Always link the information back towards the global economy. Be sure to mention stuff like its effects on world GDP etc.
Reply 794
Original post by ugk4life
oh wow that site looks amazing, thanks a lot.


It has the whole specification
Reply 795
Original post by HarryS7
What does the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis state?


That countries that export commodities would be able to import less and less for a given level of exports. Terms of trade for primary commodity exporters had a tendency to decline due to manufactured good's greater income elasticity of demand, making their prices rise more rapidly relative to primary product prices.


But then you can evaluate that by saying, some countries may have a comparative advantage at producing a specific primary product.
Also:
- In the lead upto mid 2008, primary products prices e.g. oil were actually rising and manufactured good prices were falling.
- Botswana has partially developed from the Diamond industry, which has an elastic income of demand.
- Bolivia is rich in Lithium resources, which is likely heavily increase in demand with the production of more efficient electric cars that run off lithium batteries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS

Apparently it is now BRICS!!
hello brahs :colone:

feeling quite confident on this exam, can do really well if i get a nice data response
Strategies to promote growth and development

As promised

Aid

Advantages
Reduces absolute poverty
Injections into the savings gap
Improves infrastructure
Benefits globalisation
Reduction in world inequality
Improvements in aid

Disadvantages
Dependency culture
No evidence it works
May go to corrupt governments
Left wing view Economic imperialism
Right wing view Distorts market forces
Payments of interest

Debt Cancellation

Advantages
More foreign currency
Released money used on growth and development
Reduces absolute poverty and injection savings gap

Disadvantages
Time lags
Governments may not pursue correct macroeconomic activities with released money
Shareholders have to pay the burden
Not has effective as reducing protectionism

Investment

Human Capital Education and healthcare (primary education yields best results)
Agriculture Use of countries comparative advantage

Lewis Model
Move from agriculture to manufacturing
Surplus of labour in agricultural
Marginal productivity is 0 therefore no opportunity costs
Investment is synonymous with manufacturing
However there is evidence to suggest Lewis is wrong
Also profits made may not be invested locally
Reinvestment could be made in physical capital pushing people out of jobs

Tourism

Advantages
Creates jobs
Increases tax
Preserves heritage
Attracts FDI

Disadvantages
Jobs are low skilled and seasonal
Environmental impact
Price inelastic
Subject to changes in fashion
High external costs

Inward looking strategies

Diversify in a strong way
Protects domestic growth
Experiences economies of scale

Outward looking strategies

Free trade
Deregulation of financial markets
Promotion of FDI

Interventionist approaches

After WWII the UK received many interventionist strategies by the government
Import substitution
Nationalisation
Selling products to state controlled boards
Price subsidies
Over valued exchange rates

Criticisms
Government failure
No profit motives
Lack of competition
Corruption
Increase in fiscal deficits
Increase in BOP deficits
Low rate of economic growth

Free market approaches

Public choice theory Assumption that governments only use their power for self-interest
Free market analysis Assumes the forces of supply and demand are efficient and is the best way to allocated resources

Characteristics
Deregulation
Increase in competition
Supply side policies
Market liberalisation

Criticisms
Asymmetric information
Markets not efficient
Externalities
Poor decisions
Need for governments to invest in a market friendly way

Microfinance

A means of providing extremely poor families with small loans to help then engage in productive activities
Insists on repayments
Interest is charge to cover costs
Focus’ and women and small businesses
Questionable accountancy practices
Over emphasis on this could result in a reduction of other assistance

Fair Trade

Advantages
Producers receive higher price
Extra money can be spent of human capital and infrastructure
Smaller price fluctuations
Better quality

Disadvantages
Lack on incentive
Inefficient Only 10 percent of premium goes to producers
Only based on normative views
Dependency trap
Reply 799
Original post by JuxtaposedJames
Strategies to promote growth and development

As promised

Aid

Advantages
Reduces absolute poverty
Injections into the savings gap
Improves infrastructure
Benefits globalisation
Reduction in world inequality
Improvements in aid

Disadvantages
Dependency culture
No evidence it works
May go to corrupt governments
Left wing view Economic imperialism
Right wing view Distorts market forces
Payments of interest

Debt Cancellation

Advantages
More foreign currency
Released money used on growth and development
Reduces absolute poverty and injection savings gap

Disadvantages
Time lags
Governments may not pursue correct macroeconomic activities with released money
Shareholders have to pay the burden
Not has effective as reducing protectionism

Investment

Human Capital Education and healthcare (primary education yields best results)
Agriculture Use of countries comparative advantage

Lewis Model
Move from agriculture to manufacturing
Surplus of labour in agricultural
Marginal productivity is 0 therefore no opportunity costs
Investment is synonymous with manufacturing
However there is evidence to suggest Lewis is wrong
Also profits made may not be invested locally
Reinvestment could be made in physical capital pushing people out of jobs

Tourism

Advantages
Creates jobs
Increases tax
Preserves heritage
Attracts FDI

Disadvantages
Jobs are low skilled and seasonal
Environmental impact
Price inelastic
Subject to changes in fashion
High external costs

Inward looking strategies

Diversify in a strong way
Protects domestic growth
Experiences economies of scale

Outward looking strategies

Free trade
Deregulation of financial markets
Promotion of FDI

Interventionist approaches

After WWII the UK received many interventionist strategies by the government
Import substitution
Nationalisation
Selling products to state controlled boards
Price subsidies
Over valued exchange rates

Criticisms
Government failure
No profit motives
Lack of competition
Corruption
Increase in fiscal deficits
Increase in BOP deficits
Low rate of economic growth

Free market approaches

Public choice theory Assumption that governments only use their power for self-interest
Free market analysis Assumes the forces of supply and demand are efficient and is the best way to allocated resources

Characteristics
Deregulation
Increase in competition
Supply side policies
Market liberalisation

Criticisms
Asymmetric information
Markets not efficient
Externalities
Poor decisions
Need for governments to invest in a market friendly way

Microfinance

A means of providing extremely poor families with small loans to help then engage in productive activities
Insists on repayments
Interest is charge to cover costs
Focus’ and women and small businesses
Questionable accountancy practices
Over emphasis on this could result in a reduction of other assistance

Fair Trade

Advantages
Producers receive higher price
Extra money can be spent of human capital and infrastructure
Smaller price fluctuations
Better quality

Disadvantages
Lack on incentive
Inefficient Only 10 percent of premium goes to producers
Only based on normative views
Dependency trap


thanks so much.

do you by any chance have any evaluations for the limits of growth and development?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending