if WW3 broke out would women be drawn up to fight?

please,for the love of christ, HOW are women and men equal in physical strength?? i beg of you-give me an explanation with factual evidence

In the unlikely event that WW3 would happen and in the even more unlikely event that we'd have to bring in conscription I think people should be enlisted based upon their physical and mental ability to fight rather than their gender. However if there is another world war it would not be about man power but more about drones/ threatening of nuclear action.

However (and I know this is going to piss people off) would we still be in the same situation regarding Russia and Ukraine if Putin was a woman?

Well they aren't are they. At all. But as someone here said, we can't give birth. Just as well because if we could and they couldn't, that would be sexist.

yes I said that.
Why then,is pretty much everyone here-yourself included-complaining that women not joining the army is sexism against men???

So conscript on strength not on gender

I find it hard to believe that simple propaganda would work. The only thing I can imagine working is for there to be some kind of new Gulf of Tonkin-esque situation to convince people that they are personally under attack (in a similar way to the US' war of terror at the moment).

Don't underestimate the power of propaganda. It's got us believing that the people were killing in their own homes are bad people and are a serious threat to us even though their main method of transportation is camel.
Posted from TSR Mobile

Here's an interesting fact:
If conscription is re-introduced then the first people to be conscripted will be people whose national insurance numbers end with the letter A then B etc.

you being serious?

yes I said that.
Why then,is pretty much everyone here-yourself included-complaining that women not joining the army is sexism against men???

You are the one who claimed men got the vote in exchange for going down mines.
Care to retract that assertion?

Oh I don't know. May be they are complaining about listening to feminists and women in general banging on about equality and how they can do anything men can. Men are all but redundant. In fact everything can be done from an office with a computer terminal. Poor old Y chromozone pathetic useless thing that it is. Check out Mumsnet, there's pages and pages of it.
Then fast forward to a thread about drafting for a remotely possible war and suddenly people are saying that women cant do what men can do. IE die on a battlefield.

Here's an interesting fact:
If conscription is re-introduced then the first people to be conscripted will be people whose national insurance numbers end with the letter A then B etc.

No. What I was saying was that men often got a lot of benefits in society but they also had to do the crap stuff e.g. going down mines, fighting in wars, working in factories etc. So it balances things out. now women want all the good stuff with out balancing it out with the bad stuff, so they don't want true equality.


To give an analogy. My line manager always works an extra hour a day. In return he gets monday afternoon off. If I were to demonstrate the same attitude as some feminists I would also demand monday afternoons off but I would refuse to work an extra hour every day.


Also your point about mines being pointless and it only taking 10 minutes. Was that a joke or were you being serious.