Edexcel Govt and Politics Unit 1 and 2?

why not though? you can im sure.

if you write 'pressure groups (PG)' there should be no issues.

if you were doing judges civil liberties, writing 'European Convention on Human Rights' for example would take up half the essay

also, I hope to god none of the questions are 'make a case for/against'.

If it's 'make a case for referendums' I'll be upset as there aint all that much to write about IMO (plus, against has way better examples :P)

what other examples could there be for direct democracy, i have referendums, e-petitions and focus groups. anyone found or got anymore?

Direct action (e.g. protests, marches, walkouts, boycotts, sit-ins, picketing)

I didn't think of that! Thank you so much ☺️


Posted from TSR Mobile

When Addressing the Scottish Referendum of 2014, would its origins be down to 'a constitutional change which will affect the way people are governed' or is it simply 'when it is necessary to entrench important constitutional change'? This has really thrown me 😂😂 Not an essay Q, just a simple q for me to understand it all.

True echr is another one you can shorten I don't know why you wouldn't I just don't know if they'd like it 😅but then again we get no marks for grammar or spelling in this exam so you probably can..I'm just thinking about sociology and how you're not allowed to but that's probably cause of marks for spag and it makes it look 'informal' so you probably can you're right!!

Oh my god I know those questions can some times be frustrating when there's not enough to talk about especially refs!! And i agree there are much better examples for against 😁

Posted from TSR Mobile

No worries...Also, if you need a modern example of direct democracy Switzerland uses direct democracy a lot (e.g. on state federal and municipal levels).

Oh really? That's awesome we never got taught that example 😅


Posted from TSR Mobile

In the exam are you allowed to shorten terms such as pressure groups to PGs or RD for representative democracy? The timing on this exam really sucks.

I'm a bit confused, how does a referendum entrench a constitutional change if the UK is an uncodified constitution? Surely, it can't be possible to entrench stuff?

Can anybody help me on this question:

Towhat extent is the Labour Party stillcommitted to its traditional principles?

I can't really tell you but the 2015 manifesto for the 2015 gen election might help, however some of it might need to be updated as corbyn is more socialist than miliband was in some respects, attatched is their manifesto from 2015 ☺️ if you already have this book then I'm sorry for wasting your time 😁




Posted from TSR Mobile

For the different outcomes question what is the question actually asking?

Is it the difference between the other voting systems? Different outcomes to the current system?

Different outcomes within a certain system?

Different outcomes of all the electoral systems used in the uk..be it the type of government that is usually formed, the representation it provides, whether or not it's fair eg like pr, if it's simple to use and produces a result quickly, anything as long as you mention more systems than just fptp, you could even mention every electoral system the uk uses if you want!


Posted from TSR Mobile