The Student Room Group

Edexcel A Level Economics A Paper 3 (9ECO 03) - 5th June 2023 [Exam Chat]

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Guggz
can you mention price wars as a pricing strategy


What If I just mentioned lowering prices?? Is that considered a strategy??
Reply 241
Alright, how many marks would I get for suggesting that high street retailers move their storefront partially online to facilitate lower unit labour costs (automating sales and shipping) and having an outsourced storage capable of storing more unique specialised products? (Price competition for the 12 marker in section B)
Reply 242
For the 25 marker when it mentioned ‘tax cuts’ is it feasible to mention theoretical tax cuts like ‘VAT Tax decrease from 20% to 10%’

Also for tax cuts as an evaluation would financial crowding out mitigating the effects of and increase in AD due to higher interest rate discouraging private investment and thus decreasing AD (lower tax revenue collected increased budget deficit increasing demand for loanable funds increasing interest rates)
Original post by toxicgamage56
Well the question literally doesn't specify what type of firm, could be small or large, I think it just wanted any price strat.


yeah I agree because the question was based on a more type of monopolistic competition, but there's not rlly price strategies for those, so u had to mention one that would be used in an oligopoly type market structure
im not sure because it wanted a non-price Strat and a price Strat so u have non-price, but what abt the price?
Original post by jl99
Alright, how many marks would I get for suggesting that high street retailers move their storefront partially online to facilitate lower unit labour costs (automating sales and shipping) and having an outsourced storage capable of storing more unique specialised products? (Price competition for the 12 marker in section B)
you could mention it in the form of a pricing strategy like limit pricing or predatory pricing, not sure how many marks you'd get for just lowering prices, because the two I just mentioned are specific to trying to reduce competition, and then you explain how those strategies do that
pricing AND non pricing
Original post by Top_ S
Did the 12 marker in question B say pricing or non pricing strategies or pricing and non pricing strategies?
is there an unofficial mark scheme
Reply 248
Original post by tomato123g
is there an unofficial mark scheme


yeh its on this chat somewhere above
Original post by Guggz
yeh its on this chat somewhere above

I have searched and still cant find it lol, does anyone have the link
Reply 250
Original post by tomato123g
I have searched and still cant find it lol, does anyone have the link


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yhjchybzc9oUEXX9fnTpGZThBNP9EhoDqJPyD9a8RaE/edit
Reply 251
Original post by molly.boyes
im not sure because it wanted a non-price Strat and a price Strat so u have non-price, but what abt the price?


hahahah yeah that was my price strat, I didn’t actually have a good answer so I just thought if ways they could affect costs/price. My non-price strat was focusing on providing a unique and intimate experience for consumers and building consumer loyalty. I absolutely tucked it for this question and was basically wondering if I’d get any marks for price comp with my original post.
Original post by germanium6399
For the 25 marker on falling house prices, I talked about how falling consumer confidence will lead to a decline in demand for goods and services in general which may lead to a decrease in both AR and MR for firms as consumers are more likely to save. Does the point make sense or did I just write something that's outrageously wrong haha :frown:

It does make sense (basically you described the negative wealth effect without saying it). I, for one, said there'd be an increase in consumer demand due to lower house prices which technically makes less sense since the fall in house prices is due to falling demand lol. The real question is - why you stressing about Econ 3 like 5 days after it finished?
Original post by toxicgamage56
It does make sense (basically you described the negative wealth effect without saying it). I, for one, said there'd be an increase in consumer demand due to lower house prices which technically makes less sense since the fall in house prices is due to falling demand lol. The real question is - why you stressing about Econ 3 like 5 days after it finished?

I was revising for my other exams and my brain decided to supply images of my economics exam paper and refused to shut up until I made sure what I wrote was right and not something that would make my marker question what I've learnt for the past two years haha
Original post by germanium6399
I was revising for my other exams and my brain decided to supply images of my economics exam paper and refused to shut up until I made sure what I wrote was right and not something that would make my marker question what I've learnt for the past two years haha

Eh second 25 marker on paper 3 was weak for me too, but I think economics is one of those subjects that fairly assesses you across the papers. As long as you've performed consistently, you should be gucci. Good luck for any other papers you have, economics is behind you! :smile:
Original post by toxicgamage56
Eh second 25 marker on paper 3 was weak for me too, but I think economics is one of those subjects that fairly assesses you across the papers. As long as you've performed consistently, you should be gucci. Good luck for any other papers you have, economics is behind you! :smile:

Thanks!! Good luck for your other exams too :biggrin:
Reply 256
In the 12 mark question about impact of increasing gas prices on firms that use gas in production process, do you think we would also be credited for saying that an increase in gas prices would lead to a rise in fixed rather than variable costs (shift in AC only rather than in AC and MC), and fall in profitability as a consequence? Because some of my classmates said that utilities and gas are variable costs, while myself and a couple of others said that they are fixed. Do you think that both could be considered as right answers, because both would have the same impact - fall in profitability (SNP)?
Reply 257
Original post by k990111
In the 12 mark question about impact of increasing gas prices on firms that use gas in production process, do you think we would also be credited for saying that an increase in gas prices would lead to a rise in fixed rather than variable costs (shift in AC only rather than in AC and MC), and fall in profitability as a consequence? Because some of my classmates said that utilities and gas are variable costs, while myself and a couple of others said that they are fixed. Do you think that both could be considered as right answers, because both would have the same impact - fall in profitability (SNP)?


i’m not sure whether gas is a fixed or variable cost tbh but if it isn’t they’ll just ignore where you said that but still follow your paragraphs so you should still be credited for most of it
Reply 258
As long as just justified why gas could be regarded as a fixed cost e.g (machinary maintainence costs) you should be fine.



Original post by k990111
In the 12 mark question about impact of increasing gas prices on firms that use gas in production process, do you think we would also be credited for saying that an increase in gas prices would lead to a rise in fixed rather than variable costs (shift in AC only rather than in AC and MC), and fall in profitability as a consequence? Because some of my classmates said that utilities and gas are variable costs, while myself and a couple of others said that they are fixed. Do you think that both could be considered as right answers, because both would have the same impact - fall in profitability (SNP)?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending